Pantelidis Panteleimon, Sideris Michail, Tsoulfas Georgios, Georgopoulou Efstratia-Maria, Tsagkaraki Ismini, Staikoglou Nikolaos, Stagias Georgios, Psychalakis Nikolaos, Tsitsopoulos Parmenion, Athanasiou Thanos, Zografos Georgios, Papalois Apostolos
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Queen Mary University of London (QMUL), London, UK.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Feb 1;16:52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.025. eCollection 2017 Apr.
Essentials Skills in the Management of Surgical Cases - ESMSC is an International Combined Applied Surgical Science and Wet Lab course addressed at the Undergraduate level. Laparoscopic Skills is a fundamental element of Surgical Education and various Simulation-Based Learning (SBL) models have been endorsed. This study aims to explore if there is any significant difference in delegates' performance depending on whether they completed In Vivo module prior to the equivalent in the laparoscopic simulator.
37 Medical Students from various EU countries were divided in 2 groups, and both completed the "Fundamentals in Laparoscopic Surgery" module in the Dry-lab Laparoscopic Simulator as well as the same module "In Vivo" on a swine model. Group A (18 students, 48.6%) completed the "Fundamentals in Laparoscopic Surgery - FLS" module prior to the "In Vivo", whereas group B completed the "In Vivo" module first. Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) were used to assess delegates' performance.
The mean DOPS scores for the "FLS" and "In Vivo" models were 2.27 ± 0.902 and 2.03 ± 0.833, respectively, and the delegates' performance was not statistically significantly different between them (p = 0.128). There was no statistically significant difference in the scores among different gender, year of study, school and handedness groups. The alteration in the sequence between Dry-lab "FLS" and "In Vivo" modules did not affect the performance in neither the "FLS" nor the "In Vivo" models.
The inexpensive, but low-fidelity "FLS" model could serve an equal alternative Simulation-Based Learning model for the early undergraduate training. Our study demonstrated that high fidelity In Vivo simulation for laparoscopic skills does not affect significantly the improvement in the delegates' performance at the undergraduate level. Further studies should be conducted to identify at which stage of training should high fidelity simulation be introduced.
外科病例管理基本技能(ESMSC)是一门面向本科层次的国际联合应用外科学与实践操作课程。腹腔镜技能是外科教育的基本要素,各种基于模拟的学习(SBL)模式已得到认可。本研究旨在探讨根据学员是否在腹腔镜模拟器中完成等效的体内模块之前完成体内模块,其表现是否存在显著差异。
来自不同欧盟国家的37名医学生被分为2组,两组均在干式腹腔镜模拟器中完成了“腹腔镜手术基础”模块以及在猪模型上完成了相同的“体内”模块。A组(18名学生,48.6%)在“体内”模块之前完成了“腹腔镜手术基础 - FLS”模块,而B组首先完成了“体内”模块。使用程序技能直接观察法(DOPS)来评估学员的表现。
“FLS”和“体内”模型的平均DOPS分数分别为2.27±0.902和2.03±0.833,两组学员的表现之间无统计学显著差异(p = 0.128)。不同性别、学习年份、学校和利手组之间的分数无统计学显著差异。干式“FLS”和“体内”模块顺序的改变对“FLS”模型和“体内”模型的表现均无影响。
价格低廉但逼真度较低的“FLS”模型可作为本科早期培训的等效替代基于模拟的学习模型。我们的研究表明,用于腹腔镜技能的高保真体内模拟对本科层次学员表现的提高没有显著影响。应进行进一步研究以确定应在培训的哪个阶段引入高保真模拟。