• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人改变的力量与局限:过去的不幸在当下会(以及不会)产生怎样的影响。

The power and limits of personal change: When a bad past does (and does not) inspire in the present.

机构信息

Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago.

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Aug;113(2):210-229. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000088. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1037/pspa0000088
PMID:28414482
Abstract

Observing other people improve their lives can be a powerful source of inspiration. Eight experiments explore the power, limits, and reasons for this power of personal change to inspire. We find that people who have improved from undesirable pasts (e.g., people who used to abuse extreme drugs but no longer do) are more inspiring than people who maintain consistently desirable standings (e.g., people who have never used extreme drugs to begin with), because change is perceived as more effortful than stability (Experiments 1a and 1b). The inspirational power of personal change is rooted in people's lack of access to the internal struggles and hard work that many others may endure to successfully remain 'always-good.' Accordingly, giving observers access into the effort underlying others' success in maintaining consistently positive standings restores the inspiring power of being 'always-good' (Experiments 2-4). Finally, change is more inspiring than stability across many domains but one: people who used to harm others but have since reformed (e.g., ex-bullies or ex-cheaters) do not inspire, and in many cases are indeed less inspiring than people who have never harmed others to begin with (Experiments 5-7). Together, these studies reveal how, why, and when one's past influences one's present in the eyes of others: having some "bad" in your past can be surprisingly positive, at least partly because observers assume that becoming "good" is harder than being "good" all along. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

观察他人改善生活可以成为灵感的强大源泉。八项实验探索了个人改变激发这种力量的力量、限制和原因。我们发现,那些从不良过去中改善的人(例如,曾经滥用极端药物但不再滥用的人)比那些一直保持理想状态的人更具激励性(例如,从未使用过极端药物的人),因为变化被认为比稳定更费力(实验 1a 和 1b)。个人改变的激励力量源于人们无法了解许多其他人可能为了成功地保持“总是好的”而忍受的内部斗争和辛勤工作。因此,让观察者了解他人在保持积极状态背后所付出的努力,恢复了“总是好的”的激励力量(实验 2-4)。最后,在许多领域,变化比稳定更具激励性,但有一个例外:那些曾经伤害过他人但后来改过自新的人(例如,前恶霸或前骗子)不会激励他人,在许多情况下,他们甚至不如从未伤害过他人的人更具激励性(实验 5-7)。总之,这些研究揭示了一个人的过去如何、为什么以及何时会在他人眼中影响现在:在你的过去有一些“不好”的经历可能会出人意料地带来积极影响,部分原因是观察者认为变得“好”比一直“好”更难。

相似文献

1
The power and limits of personal change: When a bad past does (and does not) inspire in the present.个人改变的力量与局限:过去的不幸在当下会(以及不会)产生怎样的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Aug;113(2):210-229. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000088. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
2
Home alone: Why people believe others' social lives are richer than their own.独自在家:为什么人们会认为别人的社交生活比自己的更丰富。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Dec;113(6):858-877. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000105.
3
The great intimidators.那些极具威慑力的人。
Harv Bus Rev. 2006 Feb;84(2):88-96, 164.
4
The invisibility cloak illusion: People (incorrectly) believe they observe others more than others observe them.隐身斗篷错觉:人们(错误地)认为他们观察他人的次数多于他人观察他们的次数。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Apr;112(4):589-606. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000082. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
5
Advice Giving: A Subtle Pathway to Power.建议给予:权力的微妙途径。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 May;44(5):746-761. doi: 10.1177/0146167217746341. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
6
Communal and Agentic Interpersonal and Intergroup Motives Predict Preferences for Status Versus Power.社交动机和主体间动机与群体间动机可以预测个体对地位与权力的偏好。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Jan;43(1):71-86. doi: 10.1177/0146167216675333.
7
Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.合作、信任与对抗:公共物品如何得到促进。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Dec;14(3):119-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100612474436.
8
Maybe holier, but definitely less evil, than you: Bounded self-righteousness in social judgment.或许比你更圣洁,但肯定没那么邪恶:社会判断中的有限度的自以为是。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 May;110(5):660-74. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000050.
9
Are the Powerful Really Blind to the Feelings of Others? How Hierarchical Concerns Shape Attention to Emotions.权力者真的对他人的感受视而不见吗?等级观念如何影响对情感的关注。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Jun;42(6):755-68. doi: 10.1177/0146167216636632. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
10
[Autonomy attitudes in the treatment compliance of a cohort of subjects with continuous psychotropic drug administration].[一组持续接受精神药物治疗的受试者治疗依从性中的自主性态度]
Encephale. 2002 Sep-Oct;28(5 Pt 1):389-96.

引用本文的文献

1
Moral contamination: Perceptions of good (but not bad) deeds depend on the ethical history of the actor.道德污染:对善举(而非恶行)的认知取决于行为者的道德历史。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 19;13:1025214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025214. eCollection 2022.
2
How strongly do moral character inferences predict forecasts of the future? Testing the moderating roles of transgressor age, implicit personality theories, and belief in karma.道德品质推断对未来预测的影响有多大?检验违法者年龄、内隐人格理论和因果报应信念的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 21;15(12):e0244144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244144. eCollection 2020.