James Lachlan P, Roberts Llion A, Haff G Gregory, Kelly Vincent G, Beckman Emma M
1School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia;2Center for Sport and Exercise Science Research, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia; and3Brisbane Broncos Rugby League Football Club, Queensland, Australia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 May;31(5):1378-1386. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001201.
James, LP, Roberts, LA, Haff, GG, Kelly, VG, and Beckman, EM. Validity and reliability of a portable isometric mid-thigh clean pull. J Strength Cond Res 31(5): 1378-1386, 2017-This study investigated the test-retest reliability and criterion validity of force-time curve variables collected through a portable isometric mid-thigh clean pull (IMTP) device equipped with a single-axial load cell. Fifteen males with ≥6 months of resistance training experience attended two testing sessions. In each session, participants performed an IMTP in 2 separate conditions in a randomized counterbalanced manner. The criterion condition consisted of a closed-chain IMTP configured with a force plate (IMTPf), whereas the experimental test was undertaken using a portable IMTP with data acquired through a single-axial load cell (IMTPl). A very high reliability (coefficient of variation [CV] = 3.10, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-4.6%; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.96, 90% CI: 0.90-0.98) and acceptable validity (CV = 9.2, 90% CI: 7-14%; ICC = 0.88, 90% CI: 0.71-0.95) were found in the experimental condition for the measure of peak force. However, significant differences were present between the IMTPf and IMTPl (p < 0.0001). Alternate force-time curve variables did not reach acceptable levels of validity or reliability in the experimental condition. The IMTPl is a valid and highly reliable method for assessing peak force. This provides evidence supporting the use of an IMTPl as a cost-effective and portable alternative for those who wish to assess maximal force production in a similar fashion to a traditional IMTP. However, practitioners should be aware that these are slightly different tests.
詹姆斯、LP、罗伯茨、LA、哈夫、GG、凯利、VG和贝克曼、EM。便携式等长中大腿借力上拉的有效性和可靠性。《力量与体能研究杂志》31(5):1378 - 1386,2017年——本研究调查了通过配备单轴测力传感器的便携式等长中大腿借力上拉(IMTP)设备收集的力-时间曲线变量的重测可靠性和标准效度。15名有≥6个月抗阻训练经验的男性参加了两次测试。在每次测试中,参与者以随机平衡的方式在2种不同条件下进行一次IMTP。标准条件包括配置有力板的闭链IMTP(IMTPf),而实验测试则使用通过单轴测力传感器获取数据的便携式IMTP(IMTPl)进行。在实验条件下,对于峰值力的测量发现了非常高的可靠性(变异系数[CV]=3.10,90%置信区间[CI]:2.4 - 4.6%;组内相关系数[ICC]=0.96,90%CI:0.90 - 0.98)和可接受的效度(CV = 9.2,90%CI:7 - 14%;ICC = 0.88,90%CI:0.71 - 0.95)。然而,IMTPf和IMTPl之间存在显著差异(p < 0.0001)。在实验条件下,其他力-时间曲线变量未达到可接受的效度或可靠性水平。IMTPl是评估峰值力的一种有效且高度可靠的方法。这为支持将IMTPl用作一种经济高效且便携的替代方法提供了证据,适用于那些希望以类似于传统IMTP的方式评估最大力量产生的人。然而,从业者应意识到这些是略有不同的测试。