Rocino Angiola, Franchini Massimo, Coppola Antonio
Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Napoli 80144, Italy.
Department of Transfusion Medicine and Haematology, Carlo Poma Hospital, Mantova 46100, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2017 Apr 17;6(4):46. doi: 10.3390/jcm6040046.
The development of alloantibodies neutralising therapeutically administered factor (F) VIII/IX (inhibitors) is currently the most severe complication of the treatment of haemophilia. When persistent and at a high titre, inhibitors preclude the standard replacement treatment with FVIII/FIX concentrates, making patients' management challenging. Indeed, the efficacy of bypassing agents, i.e., activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), needed to overcome the haemostatic interference of the inhibitor, is not comparable to that of factor concentrates. In addition, the therapeutical response is unpredictable, with a relevant inter-individual and even intra-individual variability, and no laboratory assay is validated to monitor the efficacy and safety of the treatment. As a result, inhibitor patients have a worse joint status and quality of life compared to inhibitor-free subjects and the eradication of the inhibitor by immune tolerance induction is the preeminent therapeutic goal, particularly in children. However, over the last decades, treatment with bypassing agents has been optimised, allowing home treatment and the individualisation of regimens aimed at improving clinical outcomes. In this respect, a growing body of evidence supports the efficacy of prophylaxis with both bypassing agents in reducing bleeding rates and improving the quality of life, although the impact on long-term outcomes (in particular on preventing/reducing joint deterioration) is still unknown. This review offers an update on the current knowledge and practice of the use of bypassing agents in haemophiliacs with inhibitors, as well as on debated issues and unmet needs in this challenging setting.
同种异体抗体中和治疗性应用的凝血因子VIII/IX(抑制物)的产生是目前血友病治疗中最严重的并发症。当抑制物持续存在且滴度较高时,会妨碍使用凝血因子VIII/IX浓缩物进行标准替代治疗,给患者的管理带来挑战。的确,为克服抑制物的止血干扰而需要使用的旁路制剂,即活化凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(aPCC)和重组活化因子VII(rFVIIa),其疗效不如凝血因子浓缩物。此外,治疗反应不可预测,存在显著的个体间甚至个体内差异,且尚无经过验证的实验室检测方法来监测治疗的疗效和安全性。因此,与无抑制物的患者相比,有抑制物的患者关节状况和生活质量更差,通过免疫耐受诱导消除抑制物是首要治疗目标,尤其是在儿童患者中。然而,在过去几十年中,旁路制剂的治疗已得到优化,允许在家治疗以及制定旨在改善临床结局的个体化治疗方案。在这方面,越来越多的证据支持使用旁路制剂进行预防在降低出血率和改善生活质量方面的疗效,尽管其对长期结局(特别是预防/减少关节退变)的影响仍不清楚。本综述提供了关于血友病合并抑制物患者使用旁路制剂的当前知识和实践的最新情况,以及在这一具有挑战性的领域中存在争议的问题和未满足的需求。