Silva Anjana, Hodgson Wayne C, Isbister Geoffrey K
Monash Venom Group, Department of Pharmacology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Saliyapura 50008, Sri Lanka.
Toxins (Basel). 2017 Apr 19;9(4):143. doi: 10.3390/toxins9040143.
Antivenom therapy is currently the standard practice for treating neuromuscular dysfunction in snake envenoming. We reviewed the clinical and experimental evidence-base for the efficacy and effectiveness of antivenom in snakebite neurotoxicity. The main site of snake neurotoxins is the neuromuscular junction, and the majority are either: (1) pre-synaptic neurotoxins irreversibly damaging the presynaptic terminal; or (2) post-synaptic neurotoxins that bind to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Pre-clinical tests of antivenom efficacy for neurotoxicity include rodent lethality tests, which are problematic, and in vitro pharmacological tests such as nerve-muscle preparation studies, that appear to provide more clinically meaningful information. We searched MEDLINE (from 1946) and EMBASE (from 1947) until March 2017 for clinical studies. The search yielded no randomised placebo-controlled trials of antivenom for neuromuscular dysfunction. There were several randomised and non-randomised comparative trials that compared two or more doses of the same or different antivenom, and numerous cohort studies and case reports. The majority of studies available had deficiencies including poor case definition, poor study design, small sample size or no objective measures of paralysis. A number of studies demonstrated the efficacy of antivenom in human envenoming by clearing circulating venom. Studies of snakes with primarily pre-synaptic neurotoxins, such as kraits ( spp.) and taipans ( spp.) suggest that antivenom does not reverse established neurotoxicity, but early administration may be associated with decreased severity or prevent neurotoxicity. Small studies of snakes with mainly post-synaptic neurotoxins, including some cobra species ( spp.), provide preliminary evidence that neurotoxicity may be reversed with antivenom, but placebo controlled studies with objective outcome measures are required to confirm this.
抗蛇毒血清疗法目前是治疗蛇咬伤所致神经肌肉功能障碍的标准方法。我们回顾了抗蛇毒血清治疗蛇咬伤神经毒性的有效性和疗效的临床及实验证据基础。蛇神经毒素的主要作用部位是神经肌肉接头,大多数神经毒素要么是:(1)不可逆地损伤突触前终末的突触前神经毒素;要么是(2)与烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体结合的突触后神经毒素。抗蛇毒血清对神经毒性疗效的临床前测试包括存在问题的啮齿动物致死性试验,以及诸如神经肌肉标本研究等体外药理学试验,后者似乎能提供更具临床意义的信息。我们检索了MEDLINE(始于1946年)和EMBASE(始于1947年)直至2017年3月的临床研究。检索未发现抗蛇毒血清治疗神经肌肉功能障碍的随机安慰剂对照试验。有几项随机和非随机的对照试验比较了两种或更多剂量的相同或不同抗蛇毒血清,还有大量队列研究和病例报告。现有大多数研究存在缺陷,包括病例定义不佳、研究设计欠佳、样本量小或缺乏麻痹的客观测量指标。一些研究表明抗蛇毒血清通过清除循环中的毒液对人类蛇咬伤有效。对主要含有突触前神经毒素的蛇类(如金环蛇属和太攀蛇属)的研究表明,抗蛇毒血清不能逆转已确立的神经毒性,但早期使用可能与严重程度降低或预防神经毒性有关。对主要含有突触后神经毒素的蛇类(包括一些眼镜蛇属物种)的小型研究提供了初步证据,表明抗蛇毒血清可能逆转神经毒性,但需要有客观结果测量指标的安慰剂对照研究来证实这一点。