Barnes Hayley, See Katharine, Barnett Stephen, Manser Renée
Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Australia, 3004.
Royal Melbourne Hospital, 101/25 Byron Street, North Melbourne, Australia, 3051.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 21;4(4):CD011917. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011917.pub2.
Current treatment guidelines for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) recommend concomitant platinum-based chemo-radiotherapy plus prophylactic cranial irradiation, based on the premise that SCLC disseminates early, and is chemosensitive. However, although there is usually a favourable initial response, relapse is common and the cure rate for limited-stage SCLC remains relatively poor. Some recent clinical practice guidelines have recommended surgery for stage 1 (limited) SCLC followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, but this recommendation is largely based on the findings of observational studies.
To determine whether, in patients with limited-stage SCLC, surgical resection of cancer improves overall survival and treatment-related deaths compared with radiotherapy or chemotherapy, or a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, or best supportive care.
We performed searches on CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science up to 11 January 2017. We handsearched review articles, clinical trial registries, and reference lists of retrieved articles.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with adults diagnosed with limited-stage SCLC, confirmed by cytology or histology, and radiological assessment, considered medically suitable for resection and radical radiotherapy, which randomised participants to surgery versus any other intervention.
We imported studies identified by the search into a reference manager database. We retrieved the full-text version of relevant studies, and two review authors independently extracted data. The primary outcome measures were overall survival and treatment-related deaths; and secondary outcome measures included loco-regional progression, quality of life, and adverse events.
We included three trials with 330 participants. We judged the quality of the evidence as very low for all the outcomes. The quality of the data was limited by the lack of complete outcome reporting, unclear risk of bias in the methods in which the studies were conducted, and the age of the studies (> 20 years). The methods of cancer staging and types of surgical procedures, which do not reflect current practice, reduced our confidence in the estimation of the effect.Two studies compared surgery to radiation therapy, and in one study chemotherapy was administered to both arms. One study administered initial chemotherapy, then responders were randomised to surgery versus control; following, both groups underwent chest and whole brain irradiation.Due to the clinical heterogeneity of the trials, we were unable to pool results for meta-analysis.All three studies reported overall survival. One study reported a mean overall survival of 199 days in the surgical arm, compared to 300 days in the radiotherapy arm (P = 0.04). One study reported overall survival as 4% in the surgical arm, compared to 10% in the radiotherapy arm at two years. Conversely, one study reported overall survival at two years as 52% in the surgical arm, compared to 18% in the radiotherapy arm. However this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.12).One study reported early postoperative mortality as 7% for the surgical arm, compared to 0% mortality in the radiotherapy arm. One study reported the difference in mean degree of dyspnoea as -1.2 comparing surgical intervention to radiotherapy, indicating that participants undergoing radiotherapy are likely to experience more dyspnoea. This was measured using a non-validated scale.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from currently available RCTs does not support a role for surgical resection in the management of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer; however our conclusions are limited by the quality of the available evidence and the lack of contemporary data. The results of the trials included in this review may not be generalisable to patients with clinical stage 1 small-cell lung cancer carefully staged using contemporary staging methods. Although some guidelines currently recommend surgical resection in clinical stage 1 small-cell lung cancer, prospective randomised controlled trials are needed to determine if there is any benefit in terms of short- and long-term mortality and quality of life compared with chemo-radiotherapy alone.
目前局限期小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的治疗指南推荐基于铂类的同步放化疗加预防性脑照射,其前提是SCLC早期播散且对化疗敏感。然而,尽管通常初始反应良好,但复发常见,局限期SCLC的治愈率仍然相对较低。一些近期的临床实践指南推荐对Ⅰ期(局限期)SCLC进行手术,随后进行辅助化疗,但该推荐主要基于观察性研究的结果。
确定在局限期SCLC患者中,与放疗、化疗、放化疗联合或最佳支持治疗相比,手术切除肿瘤是否能改善总生存期和治疗相关死亡。
我们检索了截至2017年1月11日的CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL和Web of Science。我们手工检索了综述文章、临床试验注册库以及检索到文章的参考文献列表。
我们纳入了针对经细胞学或组织学确诊且经影像学评估为局限期SCLC的成年人的随机对照试验(RCT),这些患者被认为在医学上适合手术切除和根治性放疗,试验将参与者随机分为手术组与其他任何干预组。
我们将检索到的研究导入参考文献管理数据库。我们获取了相关研究的全文版本,两位综述作者独立提取数据。主要结局指标为总生存期和治疗相关死亡;次要结局指标包括局部区域进展、生活质量和不良事件。
我们纳入了3项试验,共330名参与者。我们判断所有结局的证据质量都非常低。数据质量受到缺乏完整结局报告、研究实施方法中偏倚风险不明确以及研究年代久远(>20年)的限制。癌症分期方法和手术方式不能反映当前实践,降低了我们对效应估计的信心。两项研究比较了手术与放疗,其中一项研究两组均给予化疗。一项研究先给予初始化疗,然后将缓解者随机分为手术组与对照组;随后,两组均接受胸部和全脑照射。由于试验的临床异质性,我们无法合并结果进行荟萃分析。所有三项研究均报告了总生存期。一项研究报告手术组的平均总生存期为199天,放疗组为300天(P = 0.04)。一项研究报告手术组两年总生存率为4%,放疗组为10%。相反,一项研究报告手术组两年总生存率为52%,放疗组为18%。然而,这种差异无统计学意义(P = 0.12)。一项研究报告手术组术后早期死亡率为7%,放疗组为0%。一项研究报告手术干预与放疗相比,平均呼吸困难程度差异为-1.2,表明接受放疗的参与者可能呼吸困难更严重。这是使用一个未经验证的量表测量的。
现有RCT的证据不支持手术切除在局限期小细胞肺癌管理中的作用;然而,我们的结论受到现有证据质量和缺乏当代数据的限制。本综述纳入试验的结果可能不适用于使用当代分期方法仔细分期的临床Ⅰ期小细胞肺癌患者。尽管目前一些指南推荐对临床Ⅰ期小细胞肺癌进行手术切除,但需要进行前瞻性随机对照试验来确定与单纯放化疗相比,在短期和长期死亡率及生活质量方面是否有任何益处。