Suppr超能文献

国家远程医疗报销政策的法律映射分析。

Legal Mapping Analysis of State Telehealth Reimbursement Policies.

机构信息

1 College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center , Omaha, Nebraska.

2 Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York , New York, New York.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2017 Oct;23(10):805-814. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0016. Epub 2017 Apr 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There exists rapid growth and inconsistency in the telehealth policy environment, which makes it difficult to quantitatively evaluate the impact of telehealth reimbursement and other policies without the availability of a legal mapping database.

INTRODUCTION

We describe the creation of a legal mapping database of state-level policies related to telehealth reimbursement of healthcare services. Trends and characteristics of these policies are presented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Information provided by the Center for Connected Health Policy was used to identify statewide laws and regulations regarding telehealth reimbursement. Other information was retrieved by using: (1) LexisNexis database, (2) Westlaw database, and (3) retrieval from legislative Web sites, historical documents, and contacting state officials. We examined policies for live video, store-and-forward, and remote patient monitoring (RPM).

RESULTS

In the United States, there are 24 states with policies regarding reimbursement for live video transmission. Fourteen states have store-and-forward policies, and six states have RPM-related policies. Mississippi is the only state that requires reimbursement for all three types of telehealth transmission modes. Most states (47 states) have Medicaid policies regarding live video transmission, followed by 37 states for store-and-forward and 20 states for RPM. Only 13 states require that live video will be reimbursed "consistent with" or at the "same rate" as in-person services in their Medicaid program.

DISCUSSION

There are no widely accepted telehealth reimbursement policies across states. They contain diverse restrictions and requirements that present complexities in policy evaluation and in determining policy effectiveness across states.

摘要

背景

远程医疗政策环境发展迅速且不一致,如果没有可用的法律映射数据库,就很难对远程医疗报销和其他政策的影响进行定量评估。

介绍

我们描述了创建一个与医疗服务远程医疗报销相关的州级政策法律映射数据库。展示了这些政策的趋势和特征。

材料和方法

使用来自 Connected Health Policy 中心的信息来识别有关远程医疗报销的全州范围内的法律和法规。其他信息通过以下方式检索:(1)LexisNexis 数据库,(2)Westlaw 数据库,以及(3)从立法网站、历史文件中检索和联系州官员。我们检查了有关实时视频、存储转发和远程患者监测(RPM)的政策。

结果

在美国,有 24 个州制定了有关实时视频传输报销的政策。14 个州有存储转发政策,6 个州有 RPM 相关政策。密西西比州是唯一一个要求报销所有三种远程医疗传输模式的州。大多数州(47 个州)都有关于实时视频传输的医疗补助政策,其次是 37 个州的存储转发政策和 20 个州的 RPM 政策。只有 13 个州要求其医疗补助计划中的实时视频报销“与”或“与”面对面服务相同。

讨论

各州之间没有广泛接受的远程医疗报销政策。它们包含各种限制和要求,在政策评估和确定各州之间的政策效果方面带来了复杂性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验