Wiley Kevin, Johnson Jada, Coleman Christina, Olson Christina, Chuo John, McSwain David
Department of Health Care Leadership and Management, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Jun;30(6):1559-1573. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0211. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
The surge in virtual care during the pandemic was accompanied by an increase in telehealth data of interest to policy stakeholders and other health care decision makers. However, these data often require substantial preprocessing and targeted analyses to be usable. By deliberately evaluating telehealth services with stakeholder perspectives in mind, telehealth researchers can more effectively inform clinical and policy decision making. To examine existing literature on telehealth measurement and evaluation and develop a new policy-oriented framework to guide telehealth researchers. A systematic rapid review of literature on telehealth measurement and evaluation was conducted by two independent reviewers in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The findings were analyzed and applied to the Supporting Pediatric Research on Outcomes and Utilization of Telehealth Evaluation and Measurement (STEM) Framework through the lens of key health care delivery decision makers to create a STEM Policy Framework An initial search yielded 2,324 peer-reviewed articles and gray literatyre from 2012 to 2022, of which 56 met inclusion criteria. These measured and evaluated telehealth access (41.5%), quality (32.1%), cost (15.1%), experience (5.7%), and utilization (5.7%), consistent with the STEM Framework domains, but there was no universal approach. The STEM Policy Framework focuses this literature by describing data measures for each domain from the perspectives of five stakeholders. Literature describing measurement and evaluation approaches for telehealth is limited and not standardized, with few considering policy stakeholder perspectives. With this proposed STEM Policy Framework, we aim to improve this body of literature and support researchers seeking to inform telehealth policy through their work.
疫情期间虚拟医疗的激增伴随着政策利益相关者和其他医疗保健决策者感兴趣的远程医疗数据的增加。然而,这些数据通常需要大量的预处理和针对性分析才能使用。通过在考虑利益相关者观点的情况下对远程医疗服务进行刻意评估,远程医疗研究人员可以更有效地为临床和政策决策提供信息。为了研究关于远程医疗测量和评估的现有文献,并制定一个新的面向政策的框架来指导远程医疗研究人员。两位独立评审员根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目,对关于远程医疗测量和评估的文献进行了系统快速回顾。通过关键医疗保健服务决策者的视角,对研究结果进行分析,并将其应用于支持远程医疗评估和测量的结果与利用儿科研究(STEM)框架,以创建一个STEM政策框架。初步搜索从2012年到2022年产生了2324篇同行评审文章和灰色文献,其中56篇符合纳入标准。这些文献对远程医疗的可及性(41.5%)、质量(32.1%)、成本(15.1%)、体验(5.7%)和利用率(5.7%)进行了测量和评估,与STEM框架领域一致,但没有通用方法。STEM政策框架通过从五个利益相关者的角度描述每个领域的数据指标,对这些文献进行了聚焦。描述远程医疗测量和评估方法的文献有限且不规范,很少有文献考虑政策利益相关者的观点。通过这个提议的STEM政策框架,我们旨在改进这一文献体系,并支持那些试图通过工作为远程医疗政策提供信息的研究人员。