From the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (THP, JM, EJP, MB, MK-B, CS, LT, RG); and Department of Perioperative Medicine, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK (MK-B).
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Sep;34(9):602-608. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000640.
Detecting loss of resistance (LOR) can either be taught with dedicated simulators, with a cost ranging from &OV0556;1500 to 3000, or with the 'Greengrocer's Model', requiring simply a banana.
The purpose of this study was to compare three dedicated epidural puncture training simulators and a banana in their ability to simulate LOR. Our hypothesis was that there was a difference between the four simulators when comparing the detection of LOR.
Single-blinded, randomised, controlled study.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland.
Fifty-five consultant anaesthesiologists.
The participants were asked to insert an epidural catheter in four different epidural puncture training simulators: Lumbar Puncture Simulator II (Kyoto Kagaku, Kyoto, Japan), Lumbar Epidural Injection Trainer (Erler-Zimmer, Lauf, Germany), Normal Adult Lumbar Puncture/Epidural Tissue (Simulab Corp., Seattle, Washington, USA) and a banana. The simulators were placed in identical boxes to blind the participants.
The primary outcome was the detection of LOR rated on a 100-mm visual analogue scale, in which 0 mm represented 'completely unrealistic' and 100 mm represented 'indistinguishable from a real patient'.
The mean visual analogue scale scores for LOR in the four simulators were significantly different: 60 ± 25 mm [95% confidence interval (CI), 55 to 65 mm], 50 ± 29 mm (95% CI, 44 to 55 mm), 64 ± 24 mm (95% CI, 58 to 69 mm) and 49 ± 32 mm (95% CI, 44 to 54 mm); P less than 0.001, Friedman test.
Two of the three dedicated epidural simulators were rated more realistic in detecting LOR than the banana, but some participants preferred the banana to the other three simulators. Given the relative cost of a banana compared with a dedicated simulator, we suggest that a banana be used to teach the technique of LOR for epidural puncture.
KEK Nr: Req-2015-z087.
检测到阻力丧失(LOR)可以通过专用模拟器进行教学,成本从 1500 到 3000 不等,或者使用“蔬菜水果商模型”,只需要一个香蕉即可。
本研究旨在比较三种专用硬膜外穿刺训练模拟器和香蕉在模拟 LOR 方面的能力。我们的假设是,在比较 LOR 的检测时,这四种模拟器之间存在差异。
单盲、随机、对照研究。
瑞士伯尔尼大学医院麻醉和疼痛治疗系。
55 名顾问麻醉师。
要求参与者在四个不同的硬膜外穿刺训练模拟器中插入硬膜外导管:腰椎穿刺模拟器 II(日本京都 Kagaku)、腰椎硬膜外注射训练器(德国 Erler-Zimmer)、正常成人腰椎穿刺/硬膜外组织(西雅图 Simulab Corp.)和香蕉。模拟器被放置在相同的盒子中以蒙蔽参与者。
主要结局是在 100 毫米视觉模拟量表上对 LOR 的检测,其中 0 毫米代表“完全不现实”,100 毫米代表“与真实患者无法区分”。
四个模拟器中 LOR 的平均视觉模拟量表评分有显著差异:60±25 毫米[95%置信区间(CI),55 至 65 毫米]、50±29 毫米(95% CI,44 至 55 毫米)、64±24 毫米(95% CI,58 至 69 毫米)和 49±32 毫米(95% CI,44 至 54 毫米);P 小于 0.001,Friedman 检验。
三个专用硬膜外模拟器中有两个在检测 LOR 方面的逼真程度高于香蕉,但有些参与者更喜欢香蕉而不是其他三个模拟器。鉴于香蕉与专用模拟器的相对成本,我们建议使用香蕉来教授硬膜外穿刺的 LOR 技术。
KEK 编号:Req-2015-z087。