Riley Robert F, Miller Chadwick D, Russell Gregory B, Harper Erin N, Hiestand Brian C, Hoekstra James W, Lefebvre Cedric W, Nicks Bret A, Cline David M, Askew Kim L, Mahler Simon A
Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC.
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
The HEART Pathway is a diagnostic protocol designed to identify low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain that are safe for early discharge. This protocol has been shown to significantly decrease health care resource utilization compared with usual care. However, the impact of the HEART Pathway on the cost of care has yet to be reported.
We performed a cost analysis of patients enrolled in the HEART Pathway trial, which randomized participants to either usual care or the HEART Pathway protocol. For low-risk patients, the HEART Pathway recommended early discharge from the emergency department without further testing. We compared index visit cost, cost at 30 days, and cardiac-related health care cost at 30 days between the 2 treatment arms. Costs for each patient included facility and professional costs. Cost at 30 days included total inpatient and outpatient costs, including the index encounter, regardless of etiology. Cardiac-related health care cost at 30 days included the index encounter and costs adjudicated to be cardiac-related within that period. Two hundred seventy of the 282 patients enrolled in the trial had cost data available for analysis. There was a significant reduction in cost for the HEART Pathway group at 30 days (median cost savings of $216 per individual), which was most evident in low-risk (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction score of 0-1) patients (median savings of $253 per patient) and driven primarily by lower cardiac diagnostic costs in the HEART Pathway group.
Using the HEART Pathway as a decision aid for patients with undifferentiated chest pain resulted in significant cost savings.
HEART 路径是一种诊断方案,旨在识别因胸痛到急诊科就诊且适合早期出院的低风险患者。与常规护理相比,该方案已被证明能显著降低医疗资源的利用率。然而,HEART 路径对护理成本的影响尚未见报道。
我们对参与 HEART 路径试验的患者进行了成本分析,该试验将参与者随机分为常规护理组或 HEART 路径方案组。对于低风险患者,HEART 路径建议在急诊科早期出院,无需进一步检查。我们比较了两个治疗组之间的首次就诊成本、30 天成本以及 30 天的心脏相关医疗成本。每位患者的成本包括机构成本和专业成本。30 天成本包括住院和门诊总成本,包括首次就诊,无论病因如何。30 天的心脏相关医疗成本包括首次就诊以及在此期间判定为心脏相关的成本。试验纳入的 282 名患者中有 270 名有可用的成本数据进行分析。HEART 路径组在 30 天时成本显著降低(每位患者中位数节省 216 美元),这在低风险(心肌梗死溶栓评分 0 - 1)患者中最为明显(每位患者中位数节省 253 美元),主要是由 HEART 路径组较低的心脏诊断成本驱动的。
将 HEART 路径用作未分化胸痛患者的决策辅助工具可显著节省成本。