Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, The Netherlands; Hospice Bardo, The Netherlands.
Bartiméus, The Netherlands.
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Feb;26(1):50-60. doi: 10.1177/0969733017703695. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
: Metaphors are often used within the context of ethics and healthcare but have hardly been explored in relation to moral reasoning.
: To describe a central set of metaphors in one case and to explore their contribution to moral reasoning.
: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 parents of a child suffering from the neurodegenerative disease CLN3. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and metaphors were analyzed. The researchers wrote memos and discussed about their analyses until they reached consensus.
: Participants gave oral and written consent and their confidentiality and anonymity were respected.
: A central set of metaphors referred to the semantic field of the hands and arms and consisted of two central metaphors that existed in a dialectical relationship: grasping versus letting go. Participants used these metaphors to describe their child's experiences, who had to "let go" of abilities, while "clinging" to structures and the relationship with their parent(s). They also used it to describe their own experiences: participants tried to "grab" the good moments with their child and had to "let go" of their child when (s)he approached death. Participants, in addition, "held" onto caring for their child while being confronted with the necessity to "let go" of this care, leaving it to professional caregivers.
: The ethical analysis of the findings shows that thinking in terms of the dialectical relationship between "grasping" and "letting go" helps professional caregivers to critically think about images of good care for children with CLN3. It also helps them to bear witness to the vulnerable, dependent, and embodied nature of the moral self of children with CLN3 and their parents.
: Metaphorical reasoning may support the inclusion of marginalized perspectives in moral reasoning. Future studies should further explore the contribution of metaphorical reasoning to moral reasoning in other cases.
隐喻在伦理学和医疗保健领域经常被使用,但在道德推理方面几乎没有被探讨过。
描述一个案例中的一组核心隐喻,并探讨它们对道德推理的贡献。
对 16 名患有神经退行性疾病 CLN3 的儿童的父母进行了半结构化访谈。访谈进行了录音、转录,并对隐喻进行了分析。研究人员写了备忘录,并就他们的分析进行了讨论,直到达成共识。
参与者口头和书面同意,并尊重他们的机密性和匿名性。
一组核心隐喻涉及手部和手臂的语义领域,包括两个存在辩证关系的核心隐喻:抓住与放手。参与者用这些隐喻来描述他们孩子的经历,他们不得不“放手”能力,而“坚持”结构和与父母的关系。他们还用它来描述自己的经历:参与者试图“抓住”与孩子在一起的美好时刻,当(他)接近死亡时,不得不“放手”。此外,参与者在面对必须“放手”照顾孩子的情况下,仍然“坚持”照顾孩子,将其交给专业照顾者。
对研究结果的伦理分析表明,用“抓住”和“放手”的辩证关系来思考,可以帮助专业护理人员批判性地思考照顾 CLN3 儿童的良好形象。它还有助于他们见证 CLN3 儿童及其父母脆弱、依赖和体现道德自我的性质。
隐喻推理可以支持将边缘化的观点纳入道德推理。未来的研究应该进一步探讨隐喻推理对其他案例中道德推理的贡献。