• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃预处理在食管切除术前的应用——系统评价和荟萃分析。

Gastric Preconditioning in Advance of Esophageal Resection-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Sep;21(9):1523-1532. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3416-z. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-017-3416-z
PMID:28439770
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage is one of the most severe complications following esophageal resection. Among other strategies, gastric ischemic preconditioning has been proposed to improve anastomotic integrity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate whether gastric preconditioning has influence on peri- or postoperative outcomes after esophageal resection.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies comparing gastric preconditioning with non-preconditioned patients for any indication of esophageal resection. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for main outcomes.

RESULTS

Gastric preconditioning did not reduce anastomotic leakages (OR 0.76; 95%-CI 0.51 to 1.13; p = 0.18), anastomotic strictures (OR 1.10; 95%-CI 0.58 to 2.10; p = 0.76;), major complications (OR 1.14; 95%-CI 0.60 to 2.14; p = 0.69), or in-hospital mortality (OR 0.62; 95%-CI 0.28 to 1.40; p = 0.25). However, preconditioning reduced the rate of severe leaks requiring reoperation (OR 0.20; 95%-CI 0.08 to 0.53; p = 0.001). Increasing the period between preconditioning and esophageal resection over 2 weeks did not reduce anastomotic leakage compared to shorter waiting times (OR 0.65; 95%-CI 0.38 to 1.13; p = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

With current evidence, gastric preconditioning does not seem to reduce overall rates of anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection but seems to reduce severity of leakages.

摘要

背景

吻合口漏是食管切除术后最严重的并发症之一。除其他策略外,还提出了胃缺血预处理来提高吻合口完整性。本系统评价的目的是研究胃预处理对食管切除术后围手术期结局的影响。

方法

系统地检索了比较胃预处理与非预处理患者的任何食管切除指征的研究。主要结局采用随机效应荟萃分析。

结果

胃预处理并未降低吻合口漏(OR 0.76;95%CI 0.51 至 1.13;p=0.18)、吻合口狭窄(OR 1.10;95%CI 0.58 至 2.10;p=0.76)、主要并发症(OR 1.14;95%CI 0.60 至 2.14;p=0.69)或住院死亡率(OR 0.62;95%CI 0.28 至 1.40;p=0.25)。然而,预处理降低了需要再次手术的严重漏诊率(OR 0.20;95%CI 0.08 至 0.53;p=0.001)。与较短的等待时间相比,将预处理与食管切除之间的时间间隔延长至 2 周以上并不能降低吻合口漏的发生率(OR 0.65;95%CI 0.38 至 1.13;p=0.13)。

结论

根据现有证据,胃预处理似乎不会降低食管切除术后吻合口漏的总体发生率,但似乎会降低漏的严重程度。

相似文献

1
Gastric Preconditioning in Advance of Esophageal Resection-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胃预处理在食管切除术前的应用——系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Sep;21(9):1523-1532. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3416-z. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
2
Outcomes following the main treatment options in patients with a leaking esophagus: a systematic literature review.食管渗漏患者主要治疗方案的治疗效果:一项系统文献综述
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Dec 1;30(12):1-10. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox108.
3
Short-term Outcomes of Different Techniques for Gastric Ischemic Preconditioning Before Esophagectomy: A Network Meta-analysis.不同技术用于食管切除术前行胃缺血预处理的短期结局:网状 Meta 分析。
Ann Surg. 2024 Mar 1;279(3):410-418. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006124. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
4
Gastric ischemic preconditioning may reduce the incidence and severity of anastomotic leakage after οesophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胃缺血预处理可能降低食管癌切除术后吻合口漏的发生率和严重程度:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Oct 12;33(10). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa010.
5
Management of esophageal anastomotic leaks, a systematic review and network meta-analysis.食管吻合口瘘的处理:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2024 Jul 3;37(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doae019.
6
Gastric-tube versus whole-stomach esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.食管癌胃管与全胃食管切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 7;12(3):e0173416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173416. eCollection 2017.
7
Incidence and treatment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy in German acute care hospitals: a retrospective cohort study.德国急症医院食管癌切除术后吻合口漏的发生率及治疗:一项回顾性队列研究
Int J Surg. 2025 Apr 1;111(4):2953-2961. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002274.
8
Diabetes mellitus and risk of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病与食管癌切除术后吻合口漏的风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jun 1;30(6):1-12. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox006.
9
Neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of T2N0 esophageal cancer treatment options.新辅助治疗还是 upfront 手术?T2N0 食管癌治疗选择的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.053. Epub 2018 May 3.
10
Update on therapeutic strategy for esophageal anastomotic leak: A systematic literature review.食管吻合口漏治疗策略的更新:系统文献回顾。
Thorac Cancer. 2023 Feb;14(4):339-347. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14734. Epub 2022 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Vascularity of the gastric conduit predicts complications after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.胃管道的血管状况可预测Ivor-Lewis食管癌切除术后的并发症。
Surg Endosc. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11780-8.
2
Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy: Modern Approaches to Prevention and Diagnosis.食管癌切除术后吻合口漏:预防与诊断的现代方法
Cureus. 2025 Mar 5;17(3):e80091. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80091. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Pilot Trial on Ischemic Conditioning of the Gastric Conduit in Esophageal Cancer: Feasibility and Impact on Anastomotic Leakage (TIGOAL-I).

本文引用的文献

1
Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer.前往高容量中心就医与食管癌患者生存率提高相关。
Ann Surg. 2017 Apr;265(4):743-749. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001702.
2
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Z Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov;53(11):1288-347. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107381. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
3
Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Carcinoma of the Esophagus April 2012 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society.《食管癌诊疗指南》2012年4月 由日本食管癌学会编辑
食管癌胃代食管缺血预处理的初步试验:可行性及对吻合口漏的影响(TIGOAL-I)
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Feb 5;5(1):e379. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000379. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Expanding Our Horizons: Editorial Comment on "The Effect of Laparoscopic Gastric Ischemic Preconditioning Prior to Esophagectomy on Anastomotic Stricture Rate with Comparison to Esophagectomy-Alone Controls".拓展视野:关于“与单纯食管癌切除术对照组相比,食管癌切除术前腹腔镜胃缺血预处理对吻合口狭窄率的影响”的编辑评论
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul;31(7):4165-4166. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15238-4. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
5
[Tailored surgery in the treatment of gastroesophageal cancer].[个体化手术治疗胃食管癌]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Apr;95(4):261-267. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02056-3. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
6
Different Types of Management for Anastomotic Leak Post Esophagectomy.食管癌切除术后吻合口漏的不同管理类型
Cureus. 2023 Nov 6;15(11):e48404. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48404. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Effect of gastric ischemic conditioning prior to esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.胃缺血预处理对食管癌切除术的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2023 Sep;75(6):1633-1643. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01601-9. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
8
Different gastric tubes in esophageal reconstruction during esophagectomy.不同的胃管在食管重建术中的应用。
Esophagus. 2023 Oct;20(4):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-01021-z. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
9
Quantitative assessment of gastric ischemic preconditioning on conduit perfusion in esophagectomy: propensity score weighting study.定量评估胃缺血预处理对食管癌切除术管道灌注的影响:倾向评分加权研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):6989-6997. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10191-x. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
10
Prospective Evaluation of a Universally Applied Laparoscopic Gastric Ischemic Preconditioning Protocol Prior to Esophagectomy with Comparison with Historical Controls.腹腔镜胃缺血预处理方案在食管癌根治术前的前瞻性评估:与历史对照的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep;30(9):5815-5825. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13689-9. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
Esophagus. 2015;12(1):1-30. doi: 10.1007/s10388-014-0465-1. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
4
Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.食管癌:ESMO 诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi51-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt342.
5
Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.影响食管切除术后吻合完整性的技术因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(13):4274-81. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3189-x. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
6
Highlights of the EORTC St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of gastric, gastroesophageal and oesophageal cancer - differential treatment strategies for subtypes of early gastroesophageal cancer.EORTC 圣加仑国际专家共识会关于胃、胃食管和食管癌症主要治疗的要点——早期胃食管癌症亚型的差异化治疗策略。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):2941-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.07.029. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
7
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.微创与开放手术治疗食管癌的疗效比较:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1887-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. Epub 2012 May 1.
8
Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy, the LOGIC trial.腹腔镜胃缺血预处理在微创食管切除术前的随机对照试验,LOGIC 试验。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):1822-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2123-1. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
9
Minimally invasive esophagectomy with and without gastric ischemic conditioning.微创食管切除术联合和不联合胃缺血预处理。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jun;26(6):1637-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2083-5. Epub 2011 Dec 17.
10
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.