Hua B, Olsen E H N, Sun S, Gudme C N, Wang L, Vandahl B, Roepstorff K, Kjelgaard-Hansen M, Sørensen B B, Zhao Y, Karsdal M A, Manon-Jensen T
Department of Hematology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) & Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Beijing, China.
Global Research, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark.
Haemophilia. 2017 Jul;23(4):e294-e300. doi: 10.1111/hae.13196. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
Progressive arthropathy caused by recurrent joint bleeds is a severe complication in haemophilia.
We investigated whether biomarkers of cartilage and bone degradation, and inflammation were altered in haemophilia patients and whether these biomarkers could identify haemophilia patients with arthropathy.
Serum from 35 haemophilia patients with varying degrees of arthropathy and 43 age- and gender-matched control subjects were analysed. Biomarkers of cartilage degradation (C2M, COMP, CTX-II, ADAMTS5), cartilage formation (PRO-C2), bone formation (PINP), bone resorption (CTX-I) and inflammation (hsCRP, CRPM) were measured by ELISA. Arthropathy was assessed by radiological evaluation (Pettersson score) and physical examination (Gilbert score).
In patients with haemophilia, cartilage degradation, measured by C2M, CTX-II and COMP, was increased by 25% (P < 0.05) compared with control subjects. Levels of the cartilage degradation enzyme, ADAMTS5, were 10% lower in haemophilia patients (P < 0.05). Bone formation (PINP) was reduced by 25% (P < 0.05) in haemophilia patients, whereas bone resorption (CTX-I) was increased by 30% (P < 0.001). Acute inflammation (hsCRP) was increased by 50% (P < 0.01), whereas chronic inflammation (CRPM) was decreased by 25% (P < 0.0001). The hsCRP/CRPM ratio was 60% higher (P < 0.001) in haemophilia patients relative to control subjects. A biomarker panel combining C2M, CRPM, and ADAMTS5 could distinguish haemophilia patients from control subjects with 85.3% accuracy (P < 0.0001). We found no strong correlation between biomarkers and radiological and physical examination of the joint.
Biomarkers detect increased cartilage and bone degradation, and altered inflammatory activity in haemophilia patients with arthropathy. These biomarkers could potentially be used to identify patients with progressing joint disease.
复发性关节出血导致的进行性关节病是血友病的一种严重并发症。
我们研究了软骨和骨降解以及炎症的生物标志物在血友病患者中是否发生改变,以及这些生物标志物能否识别患有关节病的血友病患者。
分析了35例患有不同程度关节病的血友病患者和43例年龄及性别匹配的对照受试者的血清。通过酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)测量软骨降解(C2M、COMP、CTX-II、ADAMTS5)、软骨形成(PRO-C2)、骨形成(PINP)、骨吸收(CTX-I)和炎症(hsCRP、CRPM)的生物标志物。通过放射学评估(Pettersson评分)和体格检查(Gilbert评分)对关节病进行评估。
在血友病患者中,通过C2M、CTX-II和COMP测量的软骨降解与对照受试者相比增加了25%(P<0.05)。血友病患者中软骨降解酶ADAMTS5的水平降低了10%(P<0.05)。血友病患者的骨形成(PINP)降低了25%(P<0.05),而骨吸收(CTX-I)增加了30%(P<0.001)。急性炎症(hsCRP)增加了50%(P<0.01),而慢性炎症(CRPM)降低了25%(P<0.0001)。血友病患者的hsCRP/CRPM比值比对照受试者高60%(P<0.001)。一个结合C2M、CRPM和ADAMTS5的生物标志物组合能够以85.3%的准确率区分血友病患者和对照受试者(P<0.0001)。我们发现生物标志物与关节的放射学和体格检查之间没有很强的相关性。
生物标志物检测到患有关节病的血友病患者软骨和骨降解增加以及炎症活动改变。这些生物标志物可能潜在地用于识别患有进展性关节疾病的患者。