Simon Gregory E, Shortreed Susan M, Johnson Eric, Beck Arne, Coleman Karen J, Rossom Rebecca C, Whiteside Ursula S, Operskalski Belinda H, Penfold Robert B
Kaiser Permanente Washington, Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Denver, CO, USA.
Depress Anxiety. 2017 Sep;34(9):794-800. doi: 10.1002/da.22623. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
While clinicians are expected to routinely assess and address suicide risk, existing data provide little guidance regarding the significance of visit-to-visit changes in suicidal ideation.
Electronic health records from four large healthcare systems identified patients completing the Patient Health Questionnaire or PHQ9 at outpatient visits. For patients completing two questionnaires within 90 days, health system records and state vital records were used to identify nonfatal and fatal suicide attempts. Analyses examined how changes in PHQ9 item 9 responses between visits predicted suicide attempt or suicide death over 90 days following the second visit.
Analyses included 430,701 pairs of item 9 responses for 118,696 patients. Among patients reporting thoughts of death or self-harm "nearly every day" at the first visit, risk of suicide attempt after the second visit ranged from approximately 2.0% among those reporting continued thoughts "nearly every day" down to 0.5% among those reporting a decrease to "not at all." Among those reporting thoughts of death or self-harm "not at all" at the first visit, risk of suicide attempt following the second visit ranged from approximately 0.2% among those continuing to report such thoughts "not at all" up to 1.2% among those reporting an increase to "nearly every day".
Resolution of suicidal ideation between visits does imply a clinically important reduction in short-term risk, but prior suicidal ideation still implies significant residual risk. Onset of suicidal ideation between visits does not imply any special elevation compared to ongoing suicidal ideation. Risk is actually highest for patients repeatedly reporting thoughts of death or self-harm.
虽然临床医生应常规评估并处理自杀风险,但现有数据几乎未就就诊期间自杀意念变化的意义提供指导。
来自四个大型医疗系统的电子健康记录识别出在门诊就诊时完成患者健康问卷(PHQ9)的患者。对于在90天内完成两份问卷的患者,利用医疗系统记录和州生命记录来识别非致命和致命自杀未遂事件。分析考察了就诊之间PHQ9第9项回答的变化如何预测第二次就诊后90天内的自杀未遂或自杀死亡情况。
分析纳入了118,696名患者的430,701对第9项回答。在首次就诊时报告“几乎每天”有死亡或自我伤害想法的患者中,第二次就诊后自杀未遂风险从报告“几乎每天”持续有此类想法的患者中的约2.0%,降至报告此类想法减少到“完全没有”的患者中的0.5%。在首次就诊时报告“完全没有”死亡或自我伤害想法的患者中,第二次就诊后自杀未遂风险从继续报告“完全没有”此类想法的患者中的约0.2%,到报告此类想法增加到“几乎每天”的患者中的1.2%不等。
就诊期间自杀意念的缓解确实意味着短期风险在临床上有重要降低,但既往有自杀意念仍意味着存在显著的残余风险。就诊期间自杀意念的出现与持续存在的自杀意念相比,并不意味着有任何特别的风险升高。反复报告死亡或自我伤害想法的患者风险实际上最高。