Blok Chris, Jackson Brian E, Guo Xianfeng, de Visser Pieter H B, Marcelis Leo F M
Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen University and ResearchWageningen, Netherlands.
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, RaleighNC, USA.
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Apr 11;8:562. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00562. eCollection 2017.
Growing on rooting media other than soils -i.e., substrate-based growing- allows for higher yields than soil-based growing as transport rates of water, nutrients, and oxygen in substrate surpass those in soil. Possibly water-based growing allows for even higher yields as transport rates of water and nutrients in water surpass those in substrate, even though the transport of oxygen may be more complex. Transport rates can only limit growth when they are below a rate corresponding to maximum plant uptake. Our first objective was to compare growth performance for three water-based growing systems with different irrigation. We compared; multi-point irrigation into a pond (DeepFlow); one-point irrigation resulting in a thin film of running water (NutrientFlow) and multi-point irrigation as droplets through air (Aeroponic). Second objective was to compare press pots as propagation medium with nutrient solution as propagation medium. The comparison included DeepFlow water-rooted cuttings with either the stem 1 cm into the nutrient solution or with the stem 1 cm above the nutrient solution. Measurements included fresh weight, dry weight, length, water supply, nutrient supply, and oxygen levels. To account for differences in radiation sum received, crop performance was evaluated with Radiation Use Efficiency (RUE) expressed as dry weight over sum of Photosynthetically Active Radiation. The reference, DeepFlow with substrate-based propagation, showed the highest RUE, even while the oxygen supply provided by irrigation was potentially growth limiting. DeepFlow with water-based propagation showed 15-17% lower RUEs than the reference. NutrientFlow showed 8% lower RUE than the reference, in combination with potentially limiting irrigation supply of nutrients and oxygen. Aeroponic showed RUE levels similar to the reference and Aeroponic had non-limiting irrigation supply of water, nutrients, and oxygen. Water-based propagation affected the subsequent cultivation in the DeepFlow negatively compared to substrate-based propagation. Water-based propagation resulted in frequent transient discolorations after transplanting in all cultivation systems, indicating a factor, other than irrigation supply of water, nutrients, and oxygen, influencing plant uptake. Plant uptake rates for water, nutrients, and oxygen are offered as a more fundamental way to compare and improve growing systems.
在非土壤的生根介质上生长——即基于基质的种植——由于基质中水分、养分和氧气的运输速率超过土壤中的运输速率,因此比基于土壤的种植产量更高。可能基于水的种植产量更高,因为水中水分和养分的运输速率超过基质中的运输速率,尽管氧气的运输可能更复杂。只有当运输速率低于与植物最大吸收量相对应的速率时,运输速率才会限制生长。我们的首要目标是比较三种不同灌溉方式的水基种植系统的生长性能。我们比较了:多点灌溉到池塘中(深液流法);单点灌溉形成薄薄的流水层(营养液膜法)以及通过空气以液滴形式进行的多点灌溉(气培法)。第二个目标是比较育苗钵作为繁殖介质和营养液作为繁殖介质的情况。比较包括深液流法水培插条,其茎部插入营养液1厘米或茎部高于营养液1厘米。测量指标包括鲜重、干重、长度、水分供应、养分供应和氧气水平。为了考虑所接收辐射总量的差异,作物性能用辐射利用效率(RUE)来评估,即干重除以光合有效辐射总量。参考组,即基于基质繁殖的深液流法,显示出最高的辐射利用效率,即使灌溉提供的氧气供应可能限制生长。基于水繁殖的深液流法的辐射利用效率比参考组低15 - 17%。营养液膜法的辐射利用效率比参考组低8%,同时养分和氧气的灌溉供应可能受到限制。气培法的辐射利用效率水平与参考组相似,并且气培法的水分、养分和氧气灌溉供应没有限制。与基于基质的繁殖相比,水基繁殖对深液流法后续栽培有负面影响。在所有栽培系统中,水基繁殖导致移栽后频繁出现短暂变色,这表明除了水分、养分和氧气的灌溉供应外,还有一个因素影响植物吸收。提供水分、养分和氧气的植物吸收速率作为一种更基本的方式来比较和改进种植系统。