Suppr超能文献

土壤栽培系统与水培系统之间的对照比较表明,水培番茄的水分利用效率更高,番茄红素和β-胡萝卜素含量也更高。

Controlled comparisons between soil and hydroponic systems reveal increased water use efficiency and higher lycopene and β-carotene contents in hydroponically grown tomatoes.

作者信息

Verdoliva Salvatore Gaetano, Gwyn-Jones Dylan, Detheridge Andrew, Robson Paul

机构信息

Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Wales, SY23 3EE, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Sci Hortic. 2021 Mar 15;279:109896. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.109896.

Abstract

There are many different types of systems used to grow food that are distinguished by ideology or the technology used. It is often difficult to directly compare yield and quality in different growth systems due to the complicated interactions between genotype, physiology and environment. Many published comparisons do not identify and acknowledge confounding factors. However, there is urgency to undertake controlled comparisons to identify the most efficient and effective food production systems, because the world faces considerable challenges to food supply with population rise, ongoing environmental degradation and the threat of climatic change. Here we compared soil with two hydroponic growth systems, drip irrigation and deep-water culture (DWC). It is often claimed that such systems differ in water use, yield and crop quality; however, such comparisons are often confounded by assessing plant and system parameters in different growth environments or where factors that are difficult to standardise between systems, such as nutrient status, are not controlled. We grew tomato ( L.) in the three growth systems in two replicated experiments, in either a polytunnel or glasshouse. We controlled and monitored water use and nutrient levels across all systems as different fertilizer applications can influence the nutritional values of produce. Plants in the two hydroponic systems transpired less water and were more water-efficient with a lower product water use than plants grown in soil. Fruit yield was similar and total soluble solids and sugar levels were not significantly different between the three growing systems. However, levels of lycopene and β-carotene were either similar or significantly higher in DWC compared to growth systems using soil or drip irrigation. Our results identify hydroponic systems as more water use efficient with DWC also capable of producing higher quality produce.

摘要

用于种植食物的系统有许多不同类型,它们因理念或所使用的技术而有所区别。由于基因型、生理学和环境之间复杂的相互作用,通常很难直接比较不同种植系统中的产量和质量。许多已发表的比较并未识别和承认混杂因素。然而,迫切需要进行对照比较,以确定最有效率和效果的粮食生产系统,因为随着人口增长、持续的环境退化以及气候变化的威胁,世界面临着粮食供应方面的巨大挑战。在这里,我们将土壤种植系统与两种水培种植系统——滴灌和深水培(DWC)进行了比较。人们常称这些系统在用水、产量和作物质量方面存在差异;然而,此类比较往往因在不同生长环境中评估植物和系统参数,或者在系统间难以标准化的因素(如养分状况)未得到控制的情况下进行评估而受到干扰。我们在两个重复实验中,于塑料大棚或温室里,在这三种种植系统中种植番茄(L.)。我们控制并监测了所有系统的用水和养分水平,因为不同的肥料施用会影响农产品的营养价值。与土壤种植的植物相比,两种水培系统中的植物蒸腾的水分更少,水分利用效率更高,产品用水更低。三种种植系统的果实产量相似,总可溶性固形物和糖分水平没有显著差异。然而,与使用土壤或滴灌的种植系统相比,深水培中番茄红素和β - 胡萝卜素的含量要么相似,要么显著更高。我们的研究结果表明水培系统用水效率更高,深水培还能够生产出质量更高的农产品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c6/7885021/e0146357d51b/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验