Sun Chu-Han, Lu Yi, Zhang Qing, Lu Rong, Bao Lin-Qing, Shen Mei-Hua, Xu Hua-Dong
School of Pharmaceutical Engineering and Life Science, Changzhou University, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province 213164, China.
Org Biomol Chem. 2017 May 16;15(19):4058-4063. doi: 10.1039/c7ob00040e.
There exist three possible patterns for the reaction of cyclic 2-oxazolidinethione and 2-benzoxazolidinethione with arynes, namely (a) S-arylation, (b) N-arylation, and (c) aryne insertion into the thiocarbonyl group (C[double bond, length as m-dash]S). Our studies demonstrate that S-arylation wins out affording S-aryl dihydrooxazoles. In contrast, for related reactions of cyclic 2-benzoxazolinone and 2-benzimidazolinone with arynes, it is found that N-arylation outcompetes O-arylation and aryne insertion into the C[double bond, length as m-dash]O group to give N-aryl 2-benzoxazolinones and N-aryl 2-benzimidazolinones.
环2-恶唑烷硫酮和2-苯并恶唑烷硫酮与芳炔的反应存在三种可能的模式,即(a) S-芳基化、(b) N-芳基化和(c) 芳炔插入硫羰基(C=S)。我们的研究表明,S-芳基化占优势,生成S-芳基二氢恶唑。相比之下,对于环2-苯并恶唑啉酮和2-苯并咪唑啉酮与芳炔的相关反应,发现N-芳基化优于O-芳基化以及芳炔插入C=O基团,生成N-芳基2-苯并恶唑啉酮和N-芳基2-苯并咪唑啉酮。