Ferraz Guilherme Augusto Rago, Rodrigues Meline Rosseto Kron, Lima Silvana Andrea Molina, Lima Marcelo Aparecido Ferraz, Maia Gabriela Lopes, Pilan Carlos Alberto, Omodei Michelle Sako, Molina Ana Cláudia, El Dib Regina, Rudge Marilza Vieira Cunha
MSc. PhD's Student, Postgraduate Program on Gynecology, Obstetrics and Mastology, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu (SP), Brazil.
PhD. Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu (SP), Brazil.
Sao Paulo Med J. 2017 Mar-Apr;135(2):123-132. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2016.0267031116. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
: This systematic review compared reiki and prayer with drug use for relieving pain during hospitalization for cesarean, given that the popularity of integrative medicine and spiritual healing has been increasing. It had the aim of evaluating whether reiki or prayer is effective in relieving pain during cesarean section.
: Systematic review with meta-analysis conducted at Botucatu Medical School, UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
: The following databases were searched up to March 2016: MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and CENTRAL. Randomized controlled trials published in English or Portuguese were included in the review. Two reviewers independently screened eligible articles, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. A GRADE table was produced to evaluate the risk of bias.
: There was evidence with a high risk of bias showing a statistically significant decrease in pain score through use of reiki and prayer, in relation to the protocol group: mean difference = -1.68; 95% confidence interval: -1.92 to -1.43; P < 0.00001; I2 = 92%. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in heart rate or systolic or diastolic blood pressure.
: Evidence with a high risk of bias suggested that reiki and prayer meditation might be associated with pain reduction.
鉴于替代医学和心灵治愈疗法越来越受欢迎,本系统评价比较了灵气疗法和祈祷疗法与药物疗法在剖宫产住院期间缓解疼痛方面的效果。其目的是评估灵气疗法或祈祷疗法在剖宫产术中缓解疼痛是否有效。
在巴西圣保罗州立大学医学院进行的系统评价和荟萃分析。
检索截至2016年3月的以下数据库:医学索引数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区卫生科学数据库以及考克兰系统评价数据库。纳入以英文或葡萄牙文发表的随机对照试验。两名评价者独立筛选符合条件的文章、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。制作GRADE表格以评估偏倚风险。
有证据显示存在高偏倚风险,表明与常规治疗组相比,使用灵气疗法和祈祷疗法后疼痛评分有统计学意义的降低:平均差值=-1.68;95%置信区间:-1.92至-1.43;P<0.00001;I2=92%。此外,心率、收缩压或舒张压无统计学意义上的差异。
有高偏倚风险的证据表明,灵气疗法和祈祷冥想可能与疼痛减轻有关。