Takahashi Hakuo, Yoshika Masamichi, Yokoi Toyohiko
Department of Clinical Sciences and Laboratory Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata Osaka, Japan.
Blood Press Monit. 2015 Oct;20(5):286-90. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000127.
The aim of this study was to validate the performance of Omron HEM-7252G-HP and Omron HEM-7251G for monitoring upper arm blood pressure (BP) in accordance with the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 (ESH-IP revision 2010).
Three trained medical doctors validated the performance of these devices by comparing data obtained from these devices with those obtained using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer. We included 33 participants (19 men and 14 women for the experiment using HEM-7252G-HP; 16 men and 17 women for the experiment using HEM-7251G). The mean age of the participants was 50±12 and 53±10 years in the respective studies.
The percentages of test device-observer mercury sphygmomanometer BP differences within 5, 10, and 15 mmHg were 76, 92, and 97% for systolic BP (SBP) and 83, 97, and 99% for diastolic BP (DBP), respectively, in the Omron HEM-7252G-HP and 77, 92, and 99% for SBP and 85, 94, and 98% for DBP, respectively, in the Omron HEM-7251G in the part 1 analysis; both SBP and DBP passed the part 1 and part 2 criteria.The mean differences between the device and mercury readings for SBP and DBP were as follows: HEM-7252G-HP, -1.5±5.1 and -1.2±3.9 mmHg, respectively; HEM-7351G, -0.6±4.7 and -0.2±4.4 mmHg, respectively.
The Omron HEM-7252G-HP and HEM-7251G passed all the requirements of the ESH-IP 2010 revision.
本研究旨在根据2010年欧洲高血压学会国际协议修订版（ESH-IP修订版2010）验证欧姆龙HEM-7252G-HP和欧姆龙HEM-7251G监测上臂血压（BP）的性能。
三名经过培训的医生通过将这些设备获得的数据与使用标准汞柱式血压计获得的数据进行比较，验证了这些设备的性能。我们纳入了33名参与者（使用HEM-7252G-HP进行实验的有19名男性和14名女性；使用HEM-7251G进行实验的有16名男性和17名女性）。在各自的研究中，参与者的平均年龄分别为50±12岁和53±10岁。
在第1部分分析中，欧姆龙HEM-7252G-HP收缩压（SBP）在5、10和15 mmHg范围内测试设备与观察者汞柱式血压计血压差异的百分比分别为76%、92%和97%，舒张压（DBP）分别为83%、97%和99%；欧姆龙HEM-7251G的SBP分别为77%、92%和99%，DBP分别为85%、94%和98%；SBP和DBP均通过了第1部分和第2部分标准。设备与汞柱读数的SBP和DBP平均差异如下：HEM-7252G-HP分别为-1.5±5.1和-1.2±3.9 mmHg；HEM-7351G分别为-0.6±4.7和-0.2±4.4 mmHg。
欧姆龙HEM-7252G-HP和HEM-7251G通过了ESH-IP 2010修订版的所有要求。
