• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

资源耗尽:触摸屏互动与幼儿的词汇学习

All Tapped Out: Touchscreen Interactivity and Young Children's Word Learning.

作者信息

Russo-Johnson Colleen, Troseth Georgene, Duncan Charlotte, Mesghina Almaz

机构信息

Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, NashvilleTN, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 12;8:578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00578. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00578
PMID:28446895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5388766/
Abstract

Touchscreen devices differ from passive screen media in promoting physical interaction with events on the screen. Two studies examined how young children's screen-directed actions related to self-regulation (Study 1) and word learning (Study 2). In Study 1, 30 2-year-old children's tapping behaviors during game play were related to their self-regulation, measured using Carlson's snack task: girls and children with high self-regulation tapped significantly less during instruction portions of an app (including object labeling events) than did boys and children with low self-regulation. Older preschoolers ( = 47, aged 4-6 years) tapped significantly less during instruction than 2-year-olds did. Study 2 explored whether the particular way in which 170 children (2-4 years of age) interacted with a touchscreen app affected their learning of novel object labels. Conditions in which children or a named object to move it across the screen required different amounts of effort and focus, compared to a non-interactive () condition. Age by sex interactions revealed a particular benefit of dragging (a motorically challenging behavior) for preschool girls' learning compared to that of boys, especially for girls older than age 2. Boys benefited more from watching than dragging. Children from low socioeconomic status families learned more object names when dragging objects versus tapping them, possibly because tapping is a prepotent response that does not require thoughtful attention. Parents and industry experts should consider age, sex, self-regulation, and the physical requirements of children's engagement with touchscreens when designing and using educational content.

摘要

触摸屏设备与被动屏幕媒体不同,它能促进与屏幕上事件的身体互动。两项研究考察了幼儿针对屏幕的动作与自我调节(研究1)和词汇学习(研究2)之间的关系。在研究1中,30名2岁儿童在游戏过程中的点击行为与他们的自我调节有关,自我调节通过卡尔森的零食任务来衡量:在应用程序的指导部分(包括物体标注事件),自我调节能力强的女孩和儿童点击的次数明显少于自我调节能力弱的男孩和儿童。年龄稍大的学龄前儿童( = 47,4 - 6岁)在指导过程中的点击次数明显少于2岁儿童。研究2探讨了170名2 - 4岁儿童与触摸屏应用程序互动的特定方式是否会影响他们对新物体标签的学习。与非互动()条件相比,儿童 或 一个命名物体使其在屏幕上移动的条件需要不同程度的努力和注意力。年龄与性别的交互作用表明,与男孩相比,拖拽(一种对运动能力有挑战的行为)对学龄前女孩的学习有特别的好处,尤其是对2岁以上的女孩。男孩从观看中受益比从拖拽中更多。来自社会经济地位较低家庭的儿童在拖拽物体时比点击物体时学到更多的物体名称,这可能是因为点击是一种优势反应,不需要深思熟虑的关注。在设计和使用教育内容时,家长和行业专家应考虑儿童的年龄、性别、自我调节能力以及他们与触摸屏互动的身体要求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/718c/5388766/b92e4070056a/fpsyg-08-00578-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/718c/5388766/aadd4bd770c0/fpsyg-08-00578-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/718c/5388766/39a5dd28af51/fpsyg-08-00578-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/718c/5388766/ebe1702958de/fpsyg-08-00578-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/718c/5388766/b92e4070056a/fpsyg-08-00578-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/718c/5388766/aadd4bd770c0/fpsyg-08-00578-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/718c/5388766/39a5dd28af51/fpsyg-08-00578-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/718c/5388766/ebe1702958de/fpsyg-08-00578-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/718c/5388766/b92e4070056a/fpsyg-08-00578-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
All Tapped Out: Touchscreen Interactivity and Young Children's Word Learning.资源耗尽:触摸屏互动与幼儿的词汇学习
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 12;8:578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00578. eCollection 2017.
2
Can touchscreens replace teachers? Chinese children's character learning from a touchscreen-based app, video, or face-to-face instruction.触摸屏能取代教师吗?基于触摸屏的应用程序、视频或面对面教学对中国儿童的汉字学习的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Aug;244:105961. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105961. Epub 2024 May 21.
3
The effects of screen media content on young children's executive functioning.屏幕媒体内容对幼儿执行功能的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jun;170:72-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
4
Word learning from a tablet app: Toddlers perform better in a passive context.从平板电脑应用程序中学习单词:幼儿在被动情境下表现更好。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0240519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240519. eCollection 2020.
5
Just Google It: Young Children's Preferences for Touchscreens versus Books in Hypothetical Learning Tasks.谷歌一下就知道了:幼儿在假设性学习任务中对触摸屏与书籍的偏好。
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 22;7:1431. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01431. eCollection 2016.
6
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
7
Dragging but not tapping promotes preschoolers' numerical estimating with touchscreens.拖曳而非点击能促进幼儿通过触屏进行数值估算。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Oct;246:105989. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105989. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
8
Can Touchscreen Devices be Used to Facilitate Young Children's Learning? A Meta-Analysis of Touchscreen Learning Effect.触摸屏设备能否用于促进幼儿学习?触摸屏学习效果的元分析
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2580. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02580. eCollection 2018.
9
An Attentional Goldilocks Effect: An Optimal Amount of Social Interactivity Promotes Word Learning from Video.一种注意力的金发姑娘效应:适量的社交互动可促进从视频中学习单词。
J Cogn Dev. 2016 Jan 1;17(1):30-40. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2015.1034316. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
10
Using Touchscreen Tablets to Help Young Children Learn to Tell Time.使用触摸屏平板电脑帮助幼儿学习看时间。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 17;7:1800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01800. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
A Narrative Review of Haptic Technologies and Their Value for Training, Rehabilitation, and the Education of Persons with Special Needs.触觉技术的叙述性回顾及其在特殊需求人群的培训、康复和教育中的价值。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 29;24(21):6946. doi: 10.3390/s24216946.
2
Children's subjective uncertainty-driven sampling behaviour.儿童主观不确定性驱动的抽样行为。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Apr 24;11(4):231283. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231283. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Reexamining models of early learning in the digital age: Applications for learning in the wild.

本文引用的文献

1
Fast Mapping but Poor Retention by 24-Month-Old Infants.24个月大婴儿的快速映射但记忆不佳。
Infancy. 2008 Mar 4;13(2):128-157. doi: 10.1080/15250000701795598. Epub 2008 Mar 1.
2
Grounded in the World: Developmental Origins of the Embodied Mind.扎根于世界:具身认知的发展起源
Infancy. 2000 Jan;1(1):3-28. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0101_02. Epub 2000 Jan 1.
3
Baby FaceTime: can toddlers learn from online video chat?婴儿视频通话:幼儿能从在线视频聊天中学到东西吗?
重新审视数字时代的早期学习模式:在自然情境中的学习应用。
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2023 Dec;12(4):457-472. doi: 10.1037/mac0000132. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
4
Toddlers Using Tablets: They Engage, Play, and Learn.幼儿使用平板电脑:他们参与、玩耍和学习。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 31;12:564479. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.564479. eCollection 2021.
5
Touchscreens for Whom? Working Memory and Age Moderate the Impact of Contingency on Toddlers' Transfer From Video.触屏是为谁准备的?工作记忆和年龄调节了偶发性对幼儿从视频中进行迁移的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 24;12:621372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621372. eCollection 2021.
6
Word learning from a tablet app: Toddlers perform better in a passive context.从平板电脑应用程序中学习单词:幼儿在被动情境下表现更好。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0240519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240519. eCollection 2020.
7
Characteristics of Children's Media Use and Gains in Language and Literacy Skills.儿童媒体使用特点以及语言和读写能力的提升
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 9;11:2224. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02224. eCollection 2020.
8
Symbolic Understanding and Word-Picture-Referent Mapping from iPads in Autism Spectrum Condition: The Roles of Iconicity and Engagement.自闭症谱系障碍儿童使用 iPad 进行象征性理解和图文指称映射:图形象征性和参与度的作用。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 Aug;50(8):2941-2956. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04404-8.
9
Interactive media use and early childhood development.互动媒体的使用与幼儿发展。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2020 May-Jun;96(3):273-275. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 13.
10
Quality of interactive media use in early childhood and child development: a multicriteria analysis.儿童早期与儿童发展中的互动媒体使用质量:一项多准则分析。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2020 May-Jun;96(3):310-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2018.11.015. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
Dev Sci. 2017 Jul;20(4). doi: 10.1111/desc.12430. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
4
Screening preschool children for fine motor skills: environmental influence.对学龄前儿童进行精细运动技能筛查:环境影响
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Mar;28(3):1026-31. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.1026. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
5
Touch or Watch to Learn? Toddlers' Object Retrieval Using Contingent and Noncontingent Video.触摸还是观看来学习?使用有条件和非有条件视频的幼儿物体检索。
Psychol Sci. 2016 May;27(5):726-36. doi: 10.1177/0956797616636110. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
6
Toddlers' Word Learning From Contingent and Noncontingent Video on Touch Screens.幼儿通过触屏上的偶然和非偶然视频学习单词。
Child Dev. 2016 Mar-Apr;87(2):405-13. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12508.
7
Benefits and Pitfalls of Multimedia and Interactive Features in Technology-Enhanced Storybooks: A Meta-Analysis.技术增强型故事书中多媒体和交互功能的益处与陷阱:一项元分析
Rev Educ Res. 2015 Dec;85(4):698-739. doi: 10.3102/0034654314566989.
8
Exposure and Use of Mobile Media Devices by Young Children.幼儿接触和使用移动媒体设备的情况。
Pediatrics. 2015 Dec;136(6):1044-50. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2151. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
9
Putting education in "educational" apps: lessons from the science of learning.将教育融入“教育”类应用程序:从学习科学中汲取的教训。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2015 May;16(1):3-34. doi: 10.1177/1529100615569721.
10
Interactive media use at younger than the age of 2 years: time to rethink the American Academy of Pediatrics guideline?2岁以下儿童使用互动媒体:是时候重新审视美国儿科学会的指南了?
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 May;168(5):399-400. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5081.