Suppr超能文献

比较顺铂和卡铂联合紫杉醇化疗治疗复发性或转移性宫颈癌的系统评价。

A systematic review comparing cisplatin and carboplatin plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.

机构信息

Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fodazione IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Medical Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047 Treviglio, BG, Italy.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Apr;133(1):117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.042. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of advanced/recurrent cervical cancer patients is generally poor with 1-year survival ranging between 15 and 20%. Cisplatin (CDDP) based treatments are considered the most effective regimens; unfortunately toxicity is an issue in a population in which the treatment remains palliative in the finality. Carboplatin (CBDCA), with its more favorable non toxicity profile and the convenience of outpatient administration, may be a suitable alternative to CDDP in combination regimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature comparing CDDP and CBDCA based chemotherapy for advanced cervical cancer (recurrent, persistent or metastatic disease). Only studies that met the following criteria were considered for the present review: 1) patients treated with CDDP/paclitaxel or CBDCA/paclitaxel combinations as first line chemotherapy for metastatic disease; 2) one or more of the following data available: overall response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS) or time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS); 3) single-arm retrospective or prospective study; and 4) at least 20 patients enrolled.

RESULTS

17 eligible studies comprehensive of 1181 patients were included in the final analysis. The objective RR was 48.5% for CBDCA and 49.3% for CDDP-based chemotherapy. Median PFS for CDDP and CBDCA-based treatments was 6.9months and 5months respectively (p=0.03); the corresponding figures for median OS were 12.87 and 10months respectively (p=0.17).

DISCUSSION

Our study indicates that CBDCA may represent an attractive and valid alternative to the more toxic and equally effective CDDP in the treatment of advanced or recurrent cervical cancer.

摘要

简介

晚期/复发性宫颈癌患者的预后一般较差,1 年生存率在 15%至 20%之间。顺铂(CDDP)为基础的治疗被认为是最有效的方案;不幸的是,在治疗最终仍为姑息性的情况下,毒性是一个问题。卡铂(CBDCA)因其毒性谱更有利且门诊管理方便,可能是 CDDP 联合方案的合适替代药物。

材料和方法

我们对比较晚期宫颈癌(复发性、持续性或转移性疾病)中 CDDP 和 CBDCA 为基础的化疗的文献进行了系统评价。只有符合以下标准的研究才被认为符合本综述的要求:1)患者接受 CDDP/紫杉醇或 CBDCA/紫杉醇联合治疗作为转移性疾病的一线化疗;2)有以下数据之一:总缓解率(RR)、无进展生存期(PFS)或进展时间(TTP)、总生存期(OS);3)单臂回顾性或前瞻性研究;4)至少有 20 名患者入组。

结果

最终分析共纳入 17 项符合条件的研究,包括 1181 名患者。CBDCA 的客观 RR 为 48.5%,CDDP 为 49.3%。CDDP 和 CBDCA 治疗的中位 PFS 分别为 6.9 个月和 5 个月(p=0.03);中位 OS 分别为 12.87 个月和 10 个月(p=0.17)。

讨论

我们的研究表明,在治疗晚期或复发性宫颈癌方面,CBDCA 可能是一种有吸引力且有效的替代 CDDP 的选择,尽管 CDDP 毒性更大,但疗效相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验