• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你的动态上都在热议什么?新加坡卫生当局利用脸书抗击寨卡病毒。

What's buzzing on your feed? Health authorities' use of Facebook to combat Zika in Singapore.

作者信息

Vijaykumar Santosh, Meurzec Rianne Wally, Jayasundar Karthikayen, Pagliari Claudia, Fernandopulle Yohan

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, UK.

School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1155-1159. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx028.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocx028
PMID:28449047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7651910/
Abstract

In 2016, Singapore grappled with one of the largest Zika outbreaks in Southeast Asia. This study examines the use of Facebook for Zika-related outreach by the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the National Environmental Agency (NEA) from March 1, 2015, to September 1, 2016, and public response to this effort. Despite nearly equivalent outreach, MOH's Facebook posts received more likes (µ = 3.49) and shares (µ = 30.11), whereas NEA's posts received more comments (µ = 4.55), with NEA posting mostly on prevention (N = 30) and MOH on situational updates (N = 24). Thematic analyses identified prevention-related posts as garnering the most likes (N = 1277), while update-related posts were most shared (N = 1059) and commented upon (N = 220). Outreach ceased briefly for 2 months after Singapore's first imported case of Zika, but increased following the outbreak of locally transmitted cases in August 2016. Public engagement was significantly higher during Zika compared with prior haze and dengue outbreaks. The results indicate the value of Facebook as a tool for rapid outreach during infectious disease outbreaks, and as a "listening" platform for those managing the situation. We discuss implications for public health communication research and policy.

摘要

2016年,新加坡应对了东南亚规模最大的寨卡疫情之一。本研究考察了2015年3月1日至2016年9月1日期间新加坡卫生部(MOH)和国家环境局(NEA)利用脸书开展寨卡疫情相关宣传工作的情况,以及公众对此项工作的反应。尽管宣传力度几乎相当,但卫生部脸书帖子获得的点赞数(均值=3.49)和分享数(均值=30.11)更多,而国家环境局的帖子获得的评论数(均值=4.55)更多,国家环境局的帖子大多是关于预防措施(共30条),卫生部的帖子则是关于疫情形势更新(共24条)。主题分析发现,与预防相关的帖子获得的点赞数最多(1277条),而与疫情形势更新相关的帖子被分享(1059条)和评论(220条)的次数最多。在新加坡出现首例输入性寨卡病例后,宣传工作暂停了2个月,但在2016年8月本地传播病例爆发后有所增加。与之前的雾霾和登革热疫情相比,寨卡疫情期间公众的参与度显著更高。研究结果表明,脸书作为传染病爆发期间快速开展宣传工作的工具,以及作为疫情应对者的“倾听”平台具有重要价值。我们讨论了本研究对公共卫生传播研究和政策的启示。

相似文献

1
What's buzzing on your feed? Health authorities' use of Facebook to combat Zika in Singapore.你的动态上都在热议什么?新加坡卫生当局利用脸书抗击寨卡病毒。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1155-1159. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx028.
2
Measuring the Outreach Efforts of Public Health Authorities and the Public Response on Facebook During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Early 2020: Cross-Country Comparison.2020年初新冠疫情期间公共卫生当局在脸书上的宣传努力及公众反应的衡量:跨国比较
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 19;22(5):e19334. doi: 10.2196/19334.
3
Temporal and textual analysis of social media on collective discourses during the Zika virus pandemic.社交媒体在寨卡病毒疫情期间集体话语的时间和文本分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 29;20(1):804. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08923-y.
4
Strategic Uses of Facebook in Zika Outbreak Communication: Implications for the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Model.在寨卡疫情传播中使用 Facebook 的策略:对危机和紧急风险沟通模型的启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 10;15(9):1974. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091974.
5
Using the Health Belief Model to Analyze Instagram Posts about Zika for Public Health Communications.利用健康信念模型分析有关寨卡病毒的 Instagram 帖子以进行公共卫生传播。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;25(1):179-180. doi: 10.3201/eid2501.180824.
6
A Public Health Systems View of Risk Communication About Zika. Zika 病毒风险沟通的公共卫生系统视角
Public Health Rep. 2020 May/Jun;135(3):343-353. doi: 10.1177/0033354920912215. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
7
Local chatter or international buzz? Language differences on posts about Zika research on Twitter and Facebook.本地热议还是国际关注?推特和脸书上关于寨卡病毒研究帖子的语言差异
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0190482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190482. eCollection 2018.
8
Outbreak of Zika virus infection in Singapore: an epidemiological, entomological, virological, and clinical analysis.新加坡寨卡病毒感染疫情的流行病学、昆虫学、病毒学和临床分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Aug;17(8):813-821. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30249-9. Epub 2017 May 17.
9
Public sentiment and discourse about Zika virus on Instagram.Instagram上关于寨卡病毒的公众情绪与讨论。
Public Health. 2017 Sep;150:170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
10
Using Sina-Weibo microblogs to inform the development and dissemination of health awareness material about Zika virus transmission, China, 2016-17.利用新浪微博发布关于寨卡病毒传播的健康意识材料的发展和传播情况,中国,2016-2017 年。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0261602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261602. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Digital Tools in Arbovirus Surveillance: Scoping Review.数字工具在虫媒病毒监测中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 18;26:e57476. doi: 10.2196/57476.
2
Outbreak preparedness and response strategies in ASEAN member states: a scoping review.东盟成员国的疫情防范与应对策略:一项范围界定综述
IJID Reg. 2024 Aug 22;12:100430. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100430. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication and Emotional Appeals in COVID-19 Public Health Messaging: Quantitative Content Analysis.新冠疫情公共卫生信息传递中的危机和紧急风险沟通及情感诉求:定量内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 17;26:e56854. doi: 10.2196/56854.
4
The role of social media in public health crises caused by infectious disease: a scoping review.社交媒体在传染病引发的公共卫生危机中的作用:范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Dec 28;8(12):e013515. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013515.
5
Public health agencies' use of social media for communication during pandemics: a scoping review of the literature.公共卫生机构在大流行期间利用社交媒体进行沟通:文献综述
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2023 Aug;14(4):235-251. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2023.0095. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
6
Facebook and mosquito-borne disease outbreaks: An analysis of public responses to federal health agencies' posts about dengue and Zika in 2016.脸书与蚊媒疾病爆发:2016年公众对联邦卫生机构关于登革热和寨卡病毒帖子的回应分析
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Sep 12;2(9):e0000977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000977. eCollection 2022.
7
Public engagement in government officials' posts on social media during coronavirus lockdown.新冠疫情封锁期间政府官员在社交媒体上的公众参与度
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 23;18(1):e0280889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280889. eCollection 2023.
8
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of dengue prevention between dengue sustained hotspots and non-sustained hotspots in Singapore: a cross-sectional study.新加坡登革热持续热点地区与非持续热点地区之间登革热预防的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 1;12(1):18426. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22776-y.
9
Sentiment analysis tracking of COVID-19 vaccine through tweets.通过推文对新冠疫苗进行情感分析追踪。
J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2022 Mar 30:1-9. doi: 10.1007/s12652-022-03805-0.
10
Network Structure and Community Evolution Online: Behavioral and Emotional Changes in Response to COVID-19.网络结构和社区演变在线:对 COVID-19 的行为和情绪变化的反应。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 11;9:813234. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.813234. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Zika: the origin and spread of a mosquito-borne virus.寨卡病毒:一种蚊媒病毒的起源与传播
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Sep 1;94(9):675-686C. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.171082. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
2
Anxiety, depression, and quality of life in mothers of newborns with microcephaly and presumed congenital Zika virus infection.小头畸形且疑似先天性寨卡病毒感染的新生儿母亲的焦虑、抑郁及生活质量
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016 Dec;19(6):1149-1151. doi: 10.1007/s00737-016-0654-0. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
3
Health Risk Information Engagement and Amplification on Social Media.社交媒体上健康风险信息的传播与扩散
Health Educ Behav. 2017 Apr;44(2):332-339. doi: 10.1177/1090198116660310. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
4
Epidemic resurgence of dengue fever in Singapore in 2013-2014: A virological and entomological perspective.2013 - 2014年新加坡登革热疫情复燃:病毒学与昆虫学视角
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 17;16:300. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1606-z.
5
Digital Participatory Surveillance and the Zika Crisis: Opportunities and Caveats.数字参与式监测与寨卡危机:机遇与警示
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jun 13;10(6):e0004795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004795. eCollection 2016 Jun.
6
Using Social Media for Actionable Disease Surveillance and Outbreak Management: A Systematic Literature Review.利用社交媒体进行可操作的疾病监测与疫情管理:一项系统文献综述
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 5;10(10):e0139701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139701. eCollection 2015.
7
Detecting themes of public concern: a text mining analysis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Ebola live Twitter chat.检测公众关注的主题:对疾病控制与预防中心埃博拉疫情推特实时聊天内容的文本挖掘分析
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Oct 1;43(10):1109-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.05.025. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
8
A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication.医疗保健的一个新维度:社交媒体用于健康传播的用途、益处及局限性的系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 23;15(4):e85. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1933.
9
Oral susceptibility of Singapore Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus) to Zika virus.新加坡白纹伊蚊(Stegomyia aegypti)对寨卡病毒的经口易感性。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(8):e1792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001792. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
10
Adoption and use of social media among public health departments.公共卫生部门对社交媒体的采用和使用。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 26;12:242. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-242.