Suppr超能文献

Zika 病毒风险沟通的公共卫生系统视角

A Public Health Systems View of Risk Communication About Zika.

机构信息

1466 Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2020 May/Jun;135(3):343-353. doi: 10.1177/0033354920912215. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The spread of Zika virus throughout Latin America and parts of the United States in 2016 and 2017 presented a challenge to public health communicators. The objective of our study was to describe emergency risk communication practices during the 2016-2017 Zika outbreak to inform future infectious disease communication efforts.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 13 public health policy makers and practitioners, 10 public information officers, and 5 vector-control officials from May through August 2017.

RESULTS

Within the public health macro-environment, extended outbreak timeframe, government trust, US residence status, and economic insecurity set the backdrop for Zika communication efforts. Limited resources, staffing, and partnerships negatively affected public health structural capacity for communication efforts. Public health communicators and practitioners used a range of processes and practices to engage in education and outreach, including fieldwork, community meetings, and contact with health care providers. Overall, public health agencies' primary goals were to prevent Zika infection, reduce transmission, and prevent adverse birth outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Lessons learned from this disease response included understanding the macro-environment, developing partnerships across agencies and the community, and valuing diverse message platforms. These lessons can be used to improve communication approaches for health officials at the local, state, and federal levels during future infectious disease outbreaks.

摘要

目的

2016 年至 2017 年,寨卡病毒在拉丁美洲和美国部分地区的传播对公共卫生传播者提出了挑战。我们的研究目的是描述 2016-2017 年寨卡疫情期间的紧急风险沟通实践,为未来的传染病沟通工作提供信息。

方法

我们于 2017 年 5 月至 8 月期间,对 13 名公共卫生政策制定者和从业人员、10 名公共信息官员和 5 名病媒控制官员进行了半结构化电话访谈。

结果

在公共卫生宏观环境中,疫情持续时间长、政府信任度、美国居民身份和经济不安全感为寨卡病毒沟通工作奠定了背景。有限的资源、人员配备和伙伴关系对公共卫生沟通工作的结构能力产生了负面影响。公共卫生传播者和从业人员采用了一系列的流程和实践来进行教育和外展,包括实地工作、社区会议和与医疗保健提供者的接触。总体而言,公共卫生机构的主要目标是预防寨卡病毒感染、减少传播和预防不良出生结局。

结论

从这次疾病应对中吸取的经验教训包括了解宏观环境、在机构和社区之间建立伙伴关系以及重视多样化的信息平台。这些经验教训可用于改进地方、州和联邦各级卫生官员在未来传染病疫情期间的沟通方法。

相似文献

1
A Public Health Systems View of Risk Communication About Zika.
Public Health Rep. 2020 May/Jun;135(3):343-353. doi: 10.1177/0033354920912215. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
2
Assessment of State, Local, and Territorial Zika Planning and Preparedness Activities - United States, June 2016-July 2017.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Sep 7;67(35):969-973. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6735a2.
4
What's buzzing on your feed? Health authorities' use of Facebook to combat Zika in Singapore.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1155-1159. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx028.
5
Frequency of Risk-Related News Media Messages in 2016 Coverage of Zika Virus.
Risk Anal. 2018 Dec;38(12):2514-2524. doi: 10.1111/risa.12961. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
6
Partnerships Involved in Public Health Testing for Zika Virus in Florida, 2016.
Public Health Rep. 2019 Nov/Dec;134(2_suppl):43S-52S. doi: 10.1177/0033354919867720.
7
Facilitating State-Wide Collaboration around Family Planning Care in the Context of Zika.
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Jul-Aug;27(4):392-399. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 May 8.
10
US Public Health Preparedness for Zika and Other Threats Remains Vulnerable.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016 Apr;10(2):298-9. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2016.26. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Recommendations on How to Manage Anticipated Communication Dilemmas Involving Medical Countermeasures in an Emergency.
Public Health Rep. 2018 Jul/Aug;133(4):366-378. doi: 10.1177/0033354918773069. Epub 2018 May 30.
2
A survey of the knowledge, attitudes and practices on Zika virus in new York City.
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 2;18(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4991-3.
3
The Local Health Department Mandate and Capacity for Community Engagement in Emergency Preparedness: A National View Over Time.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Jul/Aug;24(4):350-359. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000680.
6
High-Performing Local Health Departments Relate Their Experiences at Community Engagement in Emergency Preparedness.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Jul/Aug;24(4):360-369. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000685.
7
Disparities in Zika Virus Testing and Incidence Among Women of Reproductive Age-New York City, 2016.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Nov/Dec;24(6):533-541. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000684.
8
Public Health Preparedness Funding: Key Programs and Trends From 2001 to 2017.
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(S2):S165-S167. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303963.
9
Federal Funding for Health Security in FY2018.
Health Secur. 2017 Jul/Aug;15(4):351-372. doi: 10.1089/hs.2017.0047. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
10
Engaging Community and Faith-Based Organizations in the Zika Response, United States, 2016.
Public Health Rep. 2017 Jul/Aug;132(4):436-442. doi: 10.1177/0033354917710212. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验