• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质子泵抑制剂不会增加肝硬化患者复发性自发性细菌性腹膜炎的风险。

Proton pump inhibitors do not increase the risk for recurrent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis.

作者信息

Kim Jung Hee, Lim Kyung Sook, Min Yang Won, Lee Hyuk, Min Byung-Hoon, Rhee Poong-Lyul, Kim Jae J, Koh Kwang Cheol, Paik Seung Woon

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 May;32(5):1064-1070. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13637.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.13637
PMID:28449345
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The present study aimed to assess the real impact of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use on incidence of recurrent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in a homogenous population composed of cirrhotic patients with a previous SBP where differences related with SBP incidence between PPI users and non-users are less likely to exist.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 307 cirrhotic patients taking diuretics for ascites control and had a previous SBP. Patients who took any PPI for at least 1 week prior to a second SBP were included in the PPI group. The incidence of a second SBP was a primary outcome and was compared between PPI group and non-PPI group before and after propensity score matching. Risk factors for a second SBP were investigated by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Second SBP occurred in 17 patients (29.3%) during mean 52.1 ± 5.2 months of PPI group and in 60 patients (24.1%) during mean 61.9 ± 4.8 months of non-PPI group, which did not differ (P = .185). In the matched cohort, second SBP similarly occurred in both groups [29.3% of PPI group vs 26.8% of non-PPI group (P = .271)]. According to the multivariate analysis, Child-Pugh score was the only significant risk factor for a second SBP (hazard ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.50, P = .001). Isolated bacteria and clinical outcomes such as of mortality, presence of sepsis, and hospital stay did not differ between the two groups in the matched cohort.

CONCLUSION

Proton pump inhibitor use is not a risk factor for recurrent SBP in cirrhotic patients.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在评估质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的使用对既往有自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)的肝硬化患者这一同质化人群中复发性SBP发生率的实际影响,在该人群中PPI使用者与非使用者之间与SBP发生率相关的差异不太可能存在。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了307例因腹水控制而服用利尿剂且既往有SBP的肝硬化患者。在第二次SBP前至少服用1周任何PPI的患者被纳入PPI组。第二次SBP的发生率是主要结局,并在倾向评分匹配前后的PPI组和非PPI组之间进行比较。通过多变量分析研究第二次SBP的危险因素。

结果

PPI组平均52.1±5.2个月期间有17例患者(29.3%)发生第二次SBP,非PPI组平均61.9±4.8个月期间有60例患者(24.1%)发生第二次SBP,两者无差异(P = 0.185)。在匹配队列中,两组第二次SBP的发生率相似[PPI组为29.3%,非PPI组为26.8%(P = 0.271)]。根据多变量分析,Child-Pugh评分是第二次SBP的唯一显著危险因素(风险比1.68,95%置信区间,1.13 - 2.50,P = 0.001)。在匹配队列中,两组之间的分离细菌以及死亡率、脓毒症的存在和住院时间等临床结局没有差异。

结论

使用质子泵抑制剂不是肝硬化患者复发性SBP的危险因素。

相似文献

1
Proton pump inhibitors do not increase the risk for recurrent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis.质子泵抑制剂不会增加肝硬化患者复发性自发性细菌性腹膜炎的风险。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 May;32(5):1064-1070. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13637.
2
Proton pump inhibitor use significantly increases the risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in 1965 patients with cirrhosis and ascites: a propensity score matched cohort study.质子泵抑制剂的使用显著增加了 1965 例肝硬化合并腹水患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎的风险:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Sep;40(6):695-704. doi: 10.1111/apt.12875. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
3
Association of proton pump inhibitor therapy with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients with ascites.质子泵抑制剂治疗与肝硬化腹水患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎的关联。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 May;104(5):1130-4. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.80. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
4
Proton pump inhibitor therapy does not increase the incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: a multicenter prospective study.质子泵抑制剂治疗不会增加肝硬化自发性细菌性腹膜炎的发生率:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
J Hepatol. 2015 May;62(5):1056-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.036. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
5
Role of proton pump inhibitors in the occurrence and the prognosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients with ascites.质子泵抑制剂在肝硬化腹水患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎发生和预后中的作用。
Liver Int. 2013 Oct;33(9):1316-23. doi: 10.1111/liv.12210. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
6
Association between proton pump inhibitor use and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients with ascites.质子泵抑制剂的使用与肝硬化腹水患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎的关系。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jun;28(6):330-4. doi: 10.1155/2014/751921.
7
Increased rate of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis among cirrhotic patients receiving pharmacologic acid suppression.接受药物抑酸治疗的肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎发生率增加。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Apr;10(4):422-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.11.019. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
8
Impact of long-term gastric acid suppression on spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with advanced decompensated liver cirrhosis.长期胃酸抑制对晚期失代偿期肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎的影响。
Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Jul;32:91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
9
Proton pump inhibitor use is associated with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with liver cirrhosis.质子泵抑制剂的使用与肝硬化患者的自发性细菌性腹膜炎有关。
Intern Med. 2014;53(10):1037-42. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.53.2021.
10
Proton pump inhibitor intake neither predisposes to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or other infections nor increases mortality in patients with cirrhosis and ascites.服用质子泵抑制剂既不会使肝硬化腹水患者易患自发性细菌性腹膜炎或其他感染,也不会增加其死亡率。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 4;9(11):e110503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110503. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Proton Pump Inhibitor Use in Patients With Cirrhosis and Its Association With Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis.质子泵抑制剂在肝硬化患者中的应用及其与自发性细菌性腹膜炎的关联
J Pharm Technol. 2025 Aug 22:87551225251364516. doi: 10.1177/87551225251364516.
2
[Optimal Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers].[质子泵抑制剂和钾竞争性酸阻滞剂的最佳使用]
Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res. 2023 Sep;23(3):180-187. doi: 10.7704/kjhugr.2023.0034. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
3
Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients with Cirrhosis: Pharmacokinetics, Benefits and Drawbacks.
肝硬化患者的质子泵抑制剂:药代动力学、获益和弊端。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2024 Dec;26(12):323-334. doi: 10.1007/s11894-024-00943-7. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
4
Cirrhotic patients on proton pump inhibitors are at a twofold risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis independently of gastrointestinal bleeding: a population-based retrospective study.使用质子泵抑制剂的肝硬化患者发生自发性细菌性腹膜炎的风险是正常人的两倍,与胃肠道出血无关:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 May-Jun;36(3):327-332. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0794. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
5
Proton Pump Inhibitors Use and Increased Risk of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Cirrhotic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.质子泵抑制剂的使用与肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎风险增加:一项回顾性队列分析
Gastroenterology Res. 2022 Aug;15(4):180-187. doi: 10.14740/gr1545. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
6
Rebuilding trust in proton pump inhibitor therapy.重建质子泵抑制剂治疗的信任。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun 28;28(24):2667-2679. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i24.2667.
7
Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy and Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Occurrence in Cirrhotic Patients: A Clinical Review.质子泵抑制剂治疗与肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎发生的关系:临床综述。
Curr Med Sci. 2022 Aug;42(4):673-680. doi: 10.1007/s11596-022-2607-3. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
8
Stop of proton-pump inhibitor treatment in patients with liver cirrhosis (STOPPIT): study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, controlled, randomized, double-blind trial.质子泵抑制剂治疗肝硬化患者的停药研究(STOPPIT):一项前瞻性、多中心、对照、随机、双盲试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Apr 12;23(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06232-w.
9
Effects of the Long-term Treatment of Proton Pump Inhibitors on the Function of Kidney and Liver in Laboratory Female Rats.质子泵抑制剂长期治疗对实验雌性大鼠肝肾功能的影响。
Arch Razi Inst. 2021 Oct 31;76(4):975-983. doi: 10.22092/ari.2021.355947.1745. eCollection 2021 Oct.
10
Correlation Between Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Complications of Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.质子泵抑制剂与肝硬化并发症的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan;33(1):44-52. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2022.20689.