• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康时代的健康素养:文献系统综述

Health literacy in the eHealth era: A systematic review of the literature.

作者信息

Kim Henna, Xie Bo

机构信息

School of Information, The University of Texas at Austin, 1616 Guadalupe Suite #5.518, Austin, TX, 78701, USA.

School of Nursing & School of Information, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jun;100(6):1073-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.015
PMID:28174067
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify studies on online health service use by people with limited health literacy, as the findings could provide insights into how health literacy has been, and should be, addressed in the eHealth era.

METHODS

To identify the relevant literature published since 2010, we performed four rounds of selection-database selection, keyword search, screening of the titles and abstracts, and screening of full texts. This process produced a final of 74 publications.

RESULTS

The themes addressed in the 74 publications fell into five categories: evaluation of health-related content, development and evaluation of eHealth services, development and evaluation of health literacy measurement tools, interventions to improve health literacy, and online health information seeking behavior.

CONCLUSION

Barriers to access to and use of online health information can result from the readability of content and poor usability of eHealth services. We need new health literacy screening tools to identify skills for adequate use of eHealth services. Mobile apps hold great potential for eHealth and mHealth services tailored to people with low health literacy.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Efforts should be made to make eHealth services easily accessible to low-literacy individuals and to enhance individual health literacy through educational programs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在识别健康素养有限人群使用在线健康服务的相关研究,因为研究结果可为了解电子健康时代健康素养如何得到解决以及应如何解决提供见解。

方法

为识别自2010年以来发表的相关文献,我们进行了四轮筛选——数据库选择、关键词搜索、标题和摘要筛选以及全文筛选。这一过程最终产生了74篇出版物。

结果

74篇出版物中涉及的主题分为五类:健康相关内容评估、电子健康服务的开发与评估、健康素养测量工具的开发与评估、提高健康素养的干预措施以及在线健康信息搜索行为。

结论

在线健康信息获取和使用的障碍可能源于内容的可读性和电子健康服务的可用性差。我们需要新的健康素养筛查工具来识别充分使用电子健康服务所需的技能。移动应用程序在为健康素养低的人群量身定制电子健康和移动健康服务方面具有巨大潜力。

实践意义

应努力使低文化水平个体能够轻松使用电子健康服务,并通过教育项目提高个体健康素养。

相似文献

1
Health literacy in the eHealth era: A systematic review of the literature.电子健康时代的健康素养:文献系统综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jun;100(6):1073-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
2
Psychometric Properties of Patient-Facing eHealth Evaluation Measures: Systematic Review and Analysis.面向患者的电子健康评估指标的心理测量特性:系统评价与分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 11;19(10):e346. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7638.
3
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
4
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
5
eHealth Interventions to Address Sexual Health, Substance Use, and Mental Health Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Systematic Review and Synthesis of Process Evaluations.针对男男性行为者性健康、物质使用和心理健康的电子健康干预措施:过程评估的系统评价与综合分析
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 23;23(4):e22477. doi: 10.2196/22477.
6
eHealth Literacy Instruments: Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.电子健康素养测评工具:系统评价测量特性
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 15;23(11):e30644. doi: 10.2196/30644.
7
Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review.根据基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准评估移动健康应用程序的内容、疗效和可用性的工具:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 1;9(12):e15433. doi: 10.2196/15433.
8
Using mobile phones to improve young people sexual and reproductive health in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review to identify barriers, facilitators, and range of mHealth solutions.利用移动电话改善中低收入国家年轻人的性健康和生殖健康:系统评价以确定障碍、促进因素和各种移动健康解决方案。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jan 16;18(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01059-7.
9
Effectiveness of eHealth Nutritional Interventions for Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.电子健康营养干预措施对中年和老年人的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 17;23(5):e15649. doi: 10.2196/15649.
10
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the Flo Cycle Tracking App on menstrual knowledge and health in low-income and middle-income countries: a longitudinal study.Flo周期追踪应用程序对低收入和中等收入国家女性月经知识及健康状况的影响:一项纵向研究
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Aug 19;3(2):e002822. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2025-002822. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative Assessment of Large Language Model Outputs and NHS Patient Information in Oral Medicine.口腔医学中大型语言模型输出与英国国家医疗服务体系患者信息的比较评估
Cureus. 2025 Aug 16;17(8):e90242. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90242. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Prevalence and predictors of medical information avoidance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
医疗信息回避的患病率及预测因素:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaf058.
4
Effect of E-Health Use on Cancer Screening Mediated Through Cancer Worry and Fatalism: A Cross-Sectional Study of Older Adults.通过癌症担忧和宿命论介导的电子健康使用对癌症筛查的影响:一项针对老年人的横断面研究。
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251355831. doi: 10.1177/10732748251355831. Epub 2025 Jul 6.
5
Attitudinal Trends and Misconceptions of Laser Hair Removal Among the Dermatology Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.皮肤科患者对激光脱毛的态度趋势及误解:一项横断面研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Jul;24(7):e70332. doi: 10.1111/jocd.70332.
6
Evaluating the Applied Knowledge of BRCA Testing among Spanish-Preferring Latino Americans: The Influence of Acculturation and Literacy.评估偏好西班牙语的拉丁裔美国人对BRCA检测的应用知识:文化适应和读写能力的影响。
Public Health Genomics. 2025;28(1):229-240. doi: 10.1159/000546903. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
7
Multidisciplinary Contributions and Research Trends in eHealth Scholarship (2000-2024): Bibliometric Analysis.电子健康学术研究中的多学科贡献与研究趋势(2000 - 2024):文献计量分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 16;27:e60071. doi: 10.2196/60071.
8
Health Care and Health Information Access by Parents With Young Children in Regional Queensland.昆士兰地区有幼儿的父母的医疗保健与健康信息获取情况
Aust J Rural Health. 2025 Jun;33(3):e70060. doi: 10.1111/ajr.70060.
9
Social networking sites use and life satisfaction: a moderated mediation model of e-health literacy, fatigue, uncertainty, and stress.社交网站的使用与生活满意度:一个关于电子健康素养、疲劳、不确定性和压力的有调节的中介模型
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 8;13(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02769-y.
10
The Motivations of Citizens to Attend an eHealth Course in the Public Library: Qualitative Interview Study.公民参加公共图书馆电子健康课程的动机:定性访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 28;9:e60612. doi: 10.2196/60612.