Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Ecole de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal (ESPUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ecole de santé publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 17;8(9):e024015. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024015.
Assessing the effects of social policies on social health inequalities (SHIs) is a complex issue. Variations in social policy between countries or regions provide natural experiments in policy implementation to perform comparative research. Comparisons are most enlightening when: the object of the evaluation is well defined (types of policies, population groups); the context of policy is analysed (history, implementation); the impact of policy on household poverty is outlined in detail; the influence of various factors (other than poverty) on SHI is taken into consideration.
This study aims to understand how income support policies (ISPs) in Brussels and Montreal influence the poverty level of households receiving social assistance, and how they are associated with SHI at birth. Two cases studies will be carried out from a comparative perspective. The analysis includes four stages : (1) The model family method will be used to compare ISPs and their impact on disposable income and poverty of households receiving social assistance in both regions. (2) Statistical analysis of administrative databases will enable the description and comparison of SHI in adverse pregnancy outcomes across the two regions. (3) Analysis of databases and documents will allow for description of various factors which are likely to interact with poverty and influence SHI at birth. (4) Based on the Diderichsen model, results from the previous stages will be used to formulate hypotheses about the mechanisms by which ISPs contribute to increasing or reducing SHI at birth in both regions.
This research was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee for Health research of Université de Montréal. In Belgium, the access to linked databases was approved by the Commission for the Protection of Privacy. Databases de-identified according to Belgian and Canadian legislation will be used. Results will be disseminated in scientific publications and will be shared with policy makers and field actors through collaborations with local organisations in Brussels and Montreal.
评估社会政策对社会健康不平等(SHI)的影响是一个复杂的问题。国家或地区之间社会政策的差异为实施政策提供了自然实验,以进行比较研究。当评估的对象定义明确(政策类型、人群群体)、政策背景得到分析(历史、实施情况)、政策对家庭贫困的影响详细概述、考虑到各种因素(除贫困外)对 SHI 的影响时,比较最为有启发性。
本研究旨在了解布鲁塞尔和蒙特利尔的收入支持政策(ISP)如何影响接受社会援助的家庭的贫困水平,以及它们如何与出生时的 SHI 相关联。将从比较的角度进行两个案例研究。分析包括四个阶段:(1)将使用模型家庭方法比较两个地区的 ISP 及其对接受社会援助的家庭可支配收入和贫困的影响。(2)对行政数据库进行统计分析,将能够描述和比较两个地区不利妊娠结局的 SHI。(3)分析数据库和文件,描述可能与贫困相互作用并影响出生时 SHI 的各种因素。(4)根据 Diderichsen 模型,利用前几个阶段的结果,就 ISP 如何有助于增加或减少两个地区出生时 SHI 的机制提出假设。
这项研究得到了蒙特利尔大学健康研究人类研究伦理委员会的批准。在比利时,访问链接数据库得到了保护隐私委员会的批准。将使用符合比利时和加拿大法规的去识别数据库。结果将以科学出版物的形式传播,并通过与布鲁塞尔和蒙特利尔的当地组织合作,与政策制定者和现场参与者分享。