• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating the effect of income support policies on social health inequalities (SHIs) at birth in Montreal and Brussels using a contextualised comparative approach and model family method: a study protocol.采用情境化比较方法和模型家庭方法评估蒙特利尔和布鲁塞尔的收入支持政策对出生时社会健康不平等(SHIs)的影响:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 17;8(9):e024015. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024015.
2
Associations between socioeconomic status and pregnancy outcomes: a greater magnitude of inequalities in perinatal health in Montreal than in Brussels.社会经济地位与妊娠结局的关联:蒙特利尔的围产期健康不平等程度大于布鲁塞尔。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 25;22(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13165-1.
3
Risk of Low Birth Weight According to Household Composition in Brussels and Montreal: Do Income Support Policies Variations Explain the Differences Observed between Both Regions?根据家庭构成评估布鲁塞尔和蒙特利尔低出生体重风险:收入支持政策变化能否解释两个地区观察到的差异?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 27;18(15):7936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157936.
4
Is the socioeconomic status of immigrant mothers in Brussels relevant to predict their risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes?布鲁塞尔的移民母亲的社会经济地位与预测其不良妊娠结局的风险有关吗?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 26;18(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2043-3.
5
The role of income inequality and social policies on income-related health inequalities in Europe.收入不平等与社会政策对欧洲收入相关健康不平等的作用。
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Oct 31;14:117. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0247-y.
6
Social Health Inequalities and eHealth: A Literature Review With Qualitative Synthesis of Theoretical and Empirical Studies.社会健康不平等与电子健康:一项对理论和实证研究进行定性综合的文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 27;19(4):e136. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6731.
7
Heat or eat: the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and nutritional and health risks among children less than 3 years of age.取暖还是吃饭:低收入家庭能源援助计划与3岁以下儿童的营养和健康风险
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1293-302. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2943.
8
[Inequalities in health in Italy].[意大利的健康不平等现象]
Epidemiol Prev. 2004 May-Jun;28(3 Suppl):i-ix, 1-161.
9
[Family policy in Western Europe: a sociological reflection].[西欧的家庭政策:社会学思考]
Annee Sociol. 1987(37):291-308.
10
Equality and poverty: views from managers and professionals from public services and household heads in the Belo Horizonte Metropolitan Area, Brazil.平等与贫困:巴西贝洛奥里藏特大都市区公共服务管理人员和专业人员以及家庭户主的观点。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Aug 6;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01243-y.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of income-support interventions on life course risk factors and health outcomes during childhood: a systematic review in high income countries.收入支持干预对高收入国家儿童期生命历程风险因素和健康结果的影响:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 22;23(1):744. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15595-x.
2
Associations between socioeconomic status and pregnancy outcomes: a greater magnitude of inequalities in perinatal health in Montreal than in Brussels.社会经济地位与妊娠结局的关联:蒙特利尔的围产期健康不平等程度大于布鲁塞尔。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 25;22(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13165-1.
3
Risk of Low Birth Weight According to Household Composition in Brussels and Montreal: Do Income Support Policies Variations Explain the Differences Observed between Both Regions?根据家庭构成评估布鲁塞尔和蒙特利尔低出生体重风险:收入支持政策变化能否解释两个地区观察到的差异?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 27;18(15):7936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157936.

本文引用的文献

1
Family Economic Security Policies and Child and Family Health.家庭经济安全政策与儿童及家庭健康。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2017 Mar;20(1):45-63. doi: 10.1007/s10567-017-0225-6.
2
The Effect of an Increased Minimum Wage on Infant Mortality and Birth Weight.提高最低工资对婴儿死亡率和出生体重的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Aug;106(8):1514-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303268. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
3
Are all immigrant mothers really at risk of low birth weight and perinatal mortality? The crucial role of socio-economic status.所有移民母亲真的都面临低体重儿出生和围产期死亡的风险吗?社会经济地位的关键作用。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Apr 8;16:75. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0860-9.
4
Response to health inequity: the role of social protection in reducing poverty and achieving equity.对健康不平等的应对:社会保护在减少贫困和实现公平方面的作用。
Health Promot Int. 2014 Jun;29 Suppl 1:i59-67. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau030.
5
Understanding why children die in high-income countries.了解高收入国家儿童死亡的原因。
Lancet. 2014 Sep 6;384(9946):915-27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60581-X.
6
Decomposing the effect of social policies on population health and inequalities: an empirical example of unemployment benefits.剖析社会政策对人口健康及不平等现象的影响:以失业救济金为例的实证研究
Scand J Public Health. 2014 Nov;42(7):635-42. doi: 10.1177/1403494814546349. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
7
The intergenerational transmission of inequality: maternal disadvantage and health at birth.代际不平等传递:母亲劣势与出生健康。
Science. 2014 May 23;344(6186):856-61. doi: 10.1126/science.1251872.
8
Welfare states and population health: the role of minimum income benefits for mortality.福利国家与人口健康:最低收入保障对死亡率的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jul;112:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.029. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
9
The social determinants of health: it's time to consider the causes of the causes.健康的社会决定因素:是时候考虑原因的原因了。
Public Health Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb;129 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):19-31. doi: 10.1177/00333549141291S206.
10
Understanding the role of welfare state characteristics for health and inequalities - an analytical review.理解福利国家特征对健康和不平等的作用——分析性综述。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 27;13:1234. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1234.

采用情境化比较方法和模型家庭方法评估蒙特利尔和布鲁塞尔的收入支持政策对出生时社会健康不平等(SHIs)的影响:研究方案。

Evaluating the effect of income support policies on social health inequalities (SHIs) at birth in Montreal and Brussels using a contextualised comparative approach and model family method: a study protocol.

机构信息

Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Ecole de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal (ESPUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Ecole de santé publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 17;8(9):e024015. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024015.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024015
PMID:30224403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6144409/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Assessing the effects of social policies on social health inequalities (SHIs) is a complex issue. Variations in social policy between countries or regions provide natural experiments in policy implementation to perform comparative research. Comparisons are most enlightening when: the object of the evaluation is well defined (types of policies, population groups); the context of policy is analysed (history, implementation); the impact of policy on household poverty is outlined in detail; the influence of various factors (other than poverty) on SHI is taken into consideration.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study aims to understand how income support policies (ISPs) in Brussels and Montreal influence the poverty level of households receiving social assistance, and how they are associated with SHI at birth. Two cases studies will be carried out from a comparative perspective. The analysis includes four stages : (1) The model family method will be used to compare ISPs and their impact on disposable income and poverty of households receiving social assistance in both regions. (2) Statistical analysis of administrative databases will enable the description and comparison of SHI in adverse pregnancy outcomes across the two regions. (3) Analysis of databases and documents will allow for description of various factors which are likely to interact with poverty and influence SHI at birth. (4) Based on the Diderichsen model, results from the previous stages will be used to formulate hypotheses about the mechanisms by which ISPs contribute to increasing or reducing SHI at birth in both regions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This research was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee for Health research of Université de Montréal. In Belgium, the access to linked databases was approved by the Commission for the Protection of Privacy. Databases de-identified according to Belgian and Canadian legislation will be used. Results will be disseminated in scientific publications and will be shared with policy makers and field actors through collaborations with local organisations in Brussels and Montreal.

摘要

简介

评估社会政策对社会健康不平等(SHI)的影响是一个复杂的问题。国家或地区之间社会政策的差异为实施政策提供了自然实验,以进行比较研究。当评估的对象定义明确(政策类型、人群群体)、政策背景得到分析(历史、实施情况)、政策对家庭贫困的影响详细概述、考虑到各种因素(除贫困外)对 SHI 的影响时,比较最为有启发性。

方法和分析

本研究旨在了解布鲁塞尔和蒙特利尔的收入支持政策(ISP)如何影响接受社会援助的家庭的贫困水平,以及它们如何与出生时的 SHI 相关联。将从比较的角度进行两个案例研究。分析包括四个阶段:(1)将使用模型家庭方法比较两个地区的 ISP 及其对接受社会援助的家庭可支配收入和贫困的影响。(2)对行政数据库进行统计分析,将能够描述和比较两个地区不利妊娠结局的 SHI。(3)分析数据库和文件,描述可能与贫困相互作用并影响出生时 SHI 的各种因素。(4)根据 Diderichsen 模型,利用前几个阶段的结果,就 ISP 如何有助于增加或减少两个地区出生时 SHI 的机制提出假设。

伦理和传播

这项研究得到了蒙特利尔大学健康研究人类研究伦理委员会的批准。在比利时,访问链接数据库得到了保护隐私委员会的批准。将使用符合比利时和加拿大法规的去识别数据库。结果将以科学出版物的形式传播,并通过与布鲁塞尔和蒙特利尔的当地组织合作,与政策制定者和现场参与者分享。