Madill Mark, Murray Janice E
Department of Psychology, University of OtagoDunedin, New Zealand.
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 13;8:591. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00591. eCollection 2017.
Cognitive aging may be accompanied by increased prioritization of social and emotional goals that enhance positive experiences and emotional states. The socioemotional selectivity theory suggests this may be achieved by giving preference to positive information and avoiding or suppressing negative information. Although there is some evidence of a positivity bias in controlled attention tasks, it remains unclear whether a positivity bias extends to the processing of affective stimuli presented outside focused attention. In two experiments, we investigated age-related differences in the effects of to-be-ignored non-face affective images on target processing. In Experiment 1, 27 older (64-90 years) and 25 young adults (19-29 years) made speeded valence judgments about centrally presented positive or negative target images taken from the International Affective Picture System. To-be-ignored distractor images were presented above and below the target image and were either positive, negative, or neutral in valence. The distractors were considered task relevant because they shared emotional characteristics with the target stimuli. Both older and young adults responded slower to targets when distractor valence was incongruent with target valence relative to when distractors were neutral. Older adults responded faster to positive than to negative targets but did not show increased interference effects from positive distractors. In Experiment 2, affective distractors were task irrelevant as the target was a three-digit array and did not share emotional characteristics with the distractors. Twenty-six older (63-84 years) and 30 young adults (18-30 years) gave speeded responses on a digit disparity task while ignoring the affective distractors positioned in the periphery. Task performance in either age group was not influenced by the task-irrelevant affective images. In keeping with the socioemotional selectivity theory, these findings suggest that older adults preferentially process task-relevant positive non-face images but only when presented within the main focus of attention.
认知衰老可能伴随着对社会和情感目标的优先级增加,这些目标会增强积极体验和情绪状态。社会情感选择性理论表明,这可能通过优先处理积极信息以及避免或抑制消极信息来实现。尽管在控制性注意力任务中存在一些积极偏向的证据,但尚不清楚积极偏向是否扩展到对聚焦注意力之外呈现的情感刺激的处理。在两项实验中,我们研究了被忽视的非面部情感图像对目标处理影响的年龄差异。在实验1中,27名老年人(64 - 90岁)和25名年轻人(19 - 29岁)对从国际情感图片系统中选取的、位于中央呈现的正面或负面目标图像进行了快速效价判断。被忽视的干扰图像呈现于目标图像的上方和下方,其效价为积极、消极或中性。这些干扰物被认为与任务相关,因为它们与目标刺激共享情感特征。当干扰物效价与目标效价不一致时,相对于干扰物为中性时,老年人和年轻人对目标的反应都更慢。老年人对正面目标的反应比对负面目标的反应更快,但并未表现出来自积极干扰物的干扰效应增加。在实验2中,情感干扰物与任务无关,因为目标是一个三位数数组,且与干扰物不共享情感特征。26名老年人(63 - 84岁)和30名年轻人(18 - 30岁)在忽略位于周边的情感干扰物的情况下,对数字差异任务进行了快速反应。两个年龄组的任务表现均未受到与任务无关的情感图像的影响。与社会情感选择性理论一致,这些发现表明,老年人优先处理与任务相关的正面非面部图像,但仅当这些图像呈现于注意力的主要焦点范围内时。