• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索反应-效应兼容性范式中的模态兼容性

Exploring Modality Compatibility in the Response-Effect Compatibility Paradigm.

作者信息

Földes Noémi, Philipp Andrea M, Badets Arnaud, Koch Iring

机构信息

RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

CNRS, Institut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d'Aquitaine (UMR 5287), Université de Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;13(1):97-104. doi: 10.5709/acp-0210-1. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.5709/acp-0210-1
PMID:28450976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5404091/
Abstract

According to , action planning is based on anticipatory perceptual representations of action-effects. This aspect of action control has been investigated in studies using the response-effect compatibility (REC) paradigm, in which responses have been shown to be facilitated if ensuing perceptual effects share codes with the response based on dimensional overlap (i.e., REC). Additionally, according to the notion of ideomotor compatibility, certain response-effect (R-E) mappings will be stronger than others because some response features resemble the anticipated sensory response effects more strongly than others (e.g., since vocal responses usually produce auditory effects, an auditory stimulus should be anticipated in a stronger manner following vocal responses rather than following manual responses). Yet, systematic research on this matter is lacking. In the present study, two REC experiments aimed to explore the influence of R-E modality mappings. In Experiment 1, vocal number word responses produced visual effects on the screen (digits vs. number words; i.e., visual-symbolic vs. visual-verbal effect codes). The REC effect was only marginally larger for visual-verbal than for visual-symbolic effects. Using verbal effect codes in Experiment 2, we found that the REC effect was larger with auditory-verbal R-E mapping than with visual-verbal R-E mapping. Overall, the findings support the hypothesis of a role of R-E modality mappings in REC effects, suggesting both further evidence for ideomotor accounts as well as code-specific and modality-specific contributions to effect anticipation.

摘要

根据[相关理论],动作规划基于对动作效果的预期感知表征。动作控制的这一方面已在使用反应-效果兼容性(REC)范式的研究中得到探讨,在该范式中,如果随后的感知效果基于维度重叠与反应共享编码(即REC),则反应会得到促进。此外,根据观念运动兼容性的概念,某些反应-效果(R-E)映射会比其他映射更强,因为一些反应特征比其他特征更强烈地类似于预期的感觉反应效果(例如,由于言语反应通常会产生听觉效果,所以在言语反应之后比在手动反应之后,应该更强烈地预期听觉刺激)。然而,在这个问题上缺乏系统的研究。在本研究中,两个REC实验旨在探索R-E模态映射的影响。在实验1中,言语数字词反应在屏幕上产生视觉效果(数字与数字词;即视觉符号与视觉言语效果编码)。视觉言语效果的REC效应仅略大于视觉符号效果。在实验2中使用言语效果编码,我们发现听觉-言语R-E映射的REC效应大于视觉-言语R-E映射。总体而言,研究结果支持R-E模态映射在REC效应中起作用的假设,这既为观念运动理论提供了进一步的证据,也表明了对效果预期的特定编码和特定模态的贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb2/5404091/b3eaad47bca0/acp-13-097-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb2/5404091/b497bf3a0207/acp-13-097-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb2/5404091/43810ccf4112/acp-13-097-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb2/5404091/c4cb3e577238/acp-13-097-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb2/5404091/b3eaad47bca0/acp-13-097-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb2/5404091/b497bf3a0207/acp-13-097-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb2/5404091/43810ccf4112/acp-13-097-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb2/5404091/c4cb3e577238/acp-13-097-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb2/5404091/b3eaad47bca0/acp-13-097-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring Modality Compatibility in the Response-Effect Compatibility Paradigm.探索反应-效应兼容性范式中的模态兼容性
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;13(1):97-104. doi: 10.5709/acp-0210-1. eCollection 2017.
2
Exploring the role of verbal-semantic overlap in response-effect compatibility.探索言语语义重叠在反应-效应相容性中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Apr;215:103275. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103275. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
3
Exploring the representational basis of response-effect compatibility: Evidence from bilingual verbal response-effect mappings.探索反应-效应兼容性的表征基础:来自双语言语反应-效应映射的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 May;186:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
4
Crossmodal Effects in Task Switching: Modality Compatibility with Vocal and Pedal Responses.任务切换中的跨通道效应:模态与语音和踏板反应的兼容性
J Cogn. 2021 Jan 21;4(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.129.
5
Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.在任务切换中区分刺激-反应兼容性和模态兼容性
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1546-1562. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01276-4. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
6
Modality compatibility in task switching depends on processing codes and task demands.任务转换中的模态兼容性取决于加工码和任务需求。
Psychol Res. 2021 Sep;85(6):2346-2363. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01412-2. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
7
Voluntary task switching is affected by modality compatibility and preparation.自愿任务转换受模态兼容性和准备的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Jul;52(5):1195-1209. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01536-5. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
8
Verbal response-effect compatibility.言语反应-效应兼容性
Mem Cognit. 2002 Dec;30(8):1297-303. doi: 10.3758/bf03213411.
9
Sensory-motor modality compatibility in multitasking: The influence of processing codes.多任务处理中的感觉运动模态兼容性:处理代码的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov;191:210-218. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
10
Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching.触觉刺激增强任务切换中模态兼容性的效应。
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(4):276-84. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000291. Epub 2015 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Generalisation of unpredictable action-effect features: Large individual differences with little on-average effect.不可预测的动作-效应特征的泛化:个体差异大,平均效应小。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Apr;77(4):898-908. doi: 10.1177/17470218231184996. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
2
Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.在任务切换中区分刺激-反应兼容性和模态兼容性
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1546-1562. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01276-4. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
GOALIATH: a theory of goal-directed behavior.

本文引用的文献

1
Anticipation of delayed action-effects: learning when an effect occurs, without knowing what this effect will be.对延迟行动效应的预期:在不知道会产生何种效应的情况下,了解效应何时发生。
Psychol Res. 2017 Sep;81(5):1072-1083. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0797-7. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
2
Action selection by temporally distal goal states.由时间上遥远的目标状态进行动作选择。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):467-473. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1096-4.
3
Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
GOALIATH:一种目标导向行为理论。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jun;86(4):1054-1077. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01563-w. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
4
The role of action effects in motor sequence planning and execution: exploring the influence of temporal and spatial effect anticipation.动作效果在运动序列规划和执行中的作用:探索时间和空间效果预期的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jun;86(4):1078-1096. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01525-2. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
通过最小化任务间串扰来消除双重任务成本:模态和特征配对的作用。
Cognition. 2016 May;150:92-108. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
4
Modality-specific effects on crosstalk in task switching: evidence from modality compatibility using bimodal stimulation.任务切换中模态特异性对串扰的影响:来自使用双峰刺激的模态兼容性的证据。
Psychol Res. 2016 Nov;80(6):935-943. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0700-y. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
5
The role of sensory-motor modality compatibility in language processing.感觉运动模态兼容性在语言处理中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2016 Mar;80(2):212-23. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0661-1. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
6
Response-effect compatibility with complex actions: the case of wheel rotations.复杂动作的反应-效果兼容性:以车轮旋转为例。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):930-40. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0828-7.
7
A review of ideomotor approaches to perception, cognition, action, and language: advancing a cultural recycling hypothesis.对感知、认知、行动和语言的观念运动方法的综述:推进文化循环假说
Psychol Res. 2016 Jan;80(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0643-8. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
8
Dissecting the response in response-effect compatibility.解析反应-效应兼容性中的反应。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Feb;224(4):647-55. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3343-x. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
9
Instant attraction: immediate action-effect bindings occur for both, stimulus- and goal-driven actions.即时吸引:刺激驱动和目标驱动的动作都会产生即时的动作效果绑定。
Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 25;3:446. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00446. eCollection 2012.
10
Role of an ideomotor mechanism in number processing.动念动作机制在数字处理中的作用。
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(1):34-43. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000171.