• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂动作的反应-效果兼容性:以车轮旋转为例。

Response-effect compatibility with complex actions: the case of wheel rotations.

作者信息

Janczyk Markus, Yamaguchi Motonori, Proctor Robert W, Pfister Roland

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany,

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):930-40. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0828-7.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-014-0828-7
PMID:25567418
Abstract

The response-effect compatibility (REC) paradigm provides an elegant tool for studying the impact of anticipated action effects on action control. Converging evidence for such anticipative processes has mainly emerged from tasks that require simple, discrete actions, whereas tasks that require more complex, continuous actions such as wheel-rotation responses have yielded discrepant results. We investigate the role of two moderating variables that have only played a minor role in effect-based theories of human action control and may account for this discrepancy: (1) the degree of dimensional overlap (rather than its mere presence) and (2) directing attention towards the action effects. The results of three experiments suggest that both factors are crucial in determining the size of REC effects for continuous wheel-rotation responses: Reliable REC effects were obtained, and they were larger with high than with low dimensional overlap and when attending to the effects than when not. Thus, the study points toward important preconditions that determine whether and how effect anticipations affect complex motor actions.

摘要

反应-效应兼容性(REC)范式为研究预期动作效应对动作控制的影响提供了一个精妙的工具。此类预期过程的趋同证据主要来自于需要简单、离散动作的任务,而需要更复杂、连续动作(如轮盘旋转反应)的任务则产生了不一致的结果。我们研究了两个调节变量的作用,这两个变量在基于效应的人类动作控制理论中仅发挥了次要作用,且可能解释了这种差异:(1)维度重叠的程度(而非仅仅是其存在)和(2)将注意力导向动作效应。三个实验的结果表明,这两个因素对于确定连续轮盘旋转反应的REC效应大小都至关重要:获得了可靠的REC效应,且在维度重叠高时比低时更大,在关注效应时比不关注时更大。因此,该研究指出了决定效应预期是否以及如何影响复杂运动动作的重要前提条件。

相似文献

1
Response-effect compatibility with complex actions: the case of wheel rotations.复杂动作的反应-效果兼容性:以车轮旋转为例。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):930-40. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0828-7.
2
What or when? The impact of anticipated social action effects is driven by action-effect compatibility, not delay.是什么或何时?预期社会行动效应的影响是由行动 - 效应兼容性驱动的,而非延迟。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Oct;79(7):2132-2142. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1371-0.
3
Backward crosstalk and the role of dimensional overlap within and between tasks.反向串扰以及任务内部和任务之间维度重叠的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jul;188:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
4
Through the portal: Effect anticipation in the central bottleneck.透过门户:中央瓶颈中的效应预期
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Sep;160:141-51. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
5
Does the anticipation of compatible partner reactions facilitate action planning in joint tasks?对兼容伙伴反应的预期是否有助于联合任务中的行动计划?
Psychol Res. 2016 Jul;80(4):464-86. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0670-0. Epub 2015 May 9.
6
Effective rotations: action effects determine the interplay of mental and manual rotations.有效旋转:动作效应决定了心理旋转和手动旋转的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Aug;141(3):489-501. doi: 10.1037/a0026997. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
7
Exploring the representational basis of response-effect compatibility: Evidence from bilingual verbal response-effect mappings.探索反应-效应兼容性的表征基础:来自双语言语反应-效应映射的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 May;186:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
8
Spatial compatibility effects with unimanual and bimanual wheel-rotation responses: an homage to guiard (1983).单手和双手轮盘旋转反应的空间兼容性效应:向吉亚德致敬(1983年)
J Mot Behav. 2013;45(5):441-54. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2013.823906. Epub 2013 Aug 25.
9
Target cuing in visual search: the effects of conformality and display location on the allocation of visual attention.视觉搜索中的目标提示:共形性和显示位置对视觉注意力分配的影响。
Hum Factors. 1999 Dec;41(4):524-42. doi: 10.1518/001872099779656752.
10
Perceiving by proxy: effect-based action control with unperceivable effects.通过代理进行感知:具有不可感知效果的基于效果的动作控制。
Cognition. 2014 Sep;132(3):251-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Why axis inversion? Optimizing interactions between users, interfaces, and visual displays in 3D environments.为何要进行轴反转?优化3D环境中用户、界面和视觉显示之间的交互。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jun 23;10(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00626-5.
2
Compatibility effects with touchless gestures.无接触手势的兼容性影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2023 Mar;241(3):743-752. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06549-1. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
3
Is there hierarchical generalization in response-effect learning?在反应-效应学习中是否存在层次概括?
Exp Brain Res. 2023 Jan;241(1):135-144. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06473-w. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
4
Perception and action as viewed from the Theory of Event Coding: a multi-lab replication and effect size estimation of common experimental designs.从事件编码理论看感知和行动:常见实验设计的多实验室复制和效应量估计。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1012-1042. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01705-8. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
5
Suppression of mutually incompatible proprioceptive and visual action effects in tool use.抑制工具使用中相互矛盾的本体感受和视觉动作效应。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 18;15(11):e0242327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242327. eCollection 2020.
6
Task relevance determines binding of effect features in action planning.任务相关性决定了动作规划中效果特征的绑定。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Nov;82(8):3811-3831. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02123-x.
7
Are freely chosen actions generated by stimulus codes or effect codes?自由选择的行为是由刺激代码还是效应代码产生的?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Oct;82(7):3767-3773. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02081-4.
8
Cue the effects: Stimulus-action effect modality compatibility and dual-task costs.引发效应:刺激-动作效应模式兼容性和双重任务成本。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Apr;46(4):350-368. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000719.
9
Exploring Modality Compatibility in the Response-Effect Compatibility Paradigm.探索反应-效应兼容性范式中的模态兼容性
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;13(1):97-104. doi: 10.5709/acp-0210-1. eCollection 2017.
10
The ideomotor recycling theory for tool use, language, and foresight.关于工具使用、语言和预见能力的观念运动循环理论。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Feb;235(2):365-377. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4812-4. Epub 2016 Nov 4.