• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)和《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD - 11)作为经历自然灾害的青春期前儿童创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的竞争模型:评估有效性和共病症状学

DSM-5 and ICD-11 as competing models of PTSD in preadolescent children exposed to a natural disaster: assessing validity and co-occurring symptomatology.

作者信息

La Greca Annette M, Danzi BreAnne A, Chan Sherilynn F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Apr 7;8(1):1310591. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1310591. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1080/20008198.2017.1310591
PMID:28451076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5399998/
Abstract

: Major revisions have been made to the DSM and ICD models of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, it is not known whether these models fit children's post-trauma responses, even though children are a vulnerable population following disasters. : Using data from Hurricane Ike, we examined how well trauma-exposed children's symptoms fit the DSM-IV, DSM-5 and ICD-11 models, and whether the models varied by gender. We also evaluated whether elevated symptoms of depression and anxiety characterized children meeting PTSD criteria based on DSM-5 and ICD-11. : Eight-months post-disaster, children ( = 327, 7-11 years) affected by Hurricane Ike completed measures of PTSD, anxiety and depression. Algorithms approximated a PTSD diagnosis based on DSM-5 and ICD-11 models. : Using confirmatory factor analysis, ICD-11 had the best-fitting model, followed by DSM-IV and DSM-5. The ICD-11 model also demonstrated strong measurement invariance across gender. Analyses revealed poor overlap between DSM-5 and ICD-11, although children meeting either set of criteria reported severe PTSD symptoms. Further, children who met PTSD criteria for DSM-5, but not for ICD-11, reported significantly higher levels of depression and general anxiety than children not meeting DSM-5 criteria. : Findings support the parsimonious ICD-11 model of PTSD for trauma-exposed children, although adequate fit also was obtained for DSM-5. Use of only one model of PTSD, be it DSM-5 or ICD-11, will likely miss children with significant post-traumatic stress. DSM-5 may identify children with high levels of comorbid symptomatology, which may require additional clinical intervention.

摘要

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)和《国际疾病分类》(ICD)模型已进行了重大修订。然而,尽管儿童是灾后的弱势群体,但尚不清楚这些模型是否适用于儿童创伤后的反应。

利用飓风“艾克”的数据,我们研究了遭受创伤儿童的症状与DSM-IV、DSM-5和ICD-11模型的契合程度,以及这些模型是否因性别而异。我们还评估了根据DSM-5和ICD-11符合PTSD标准的儿童是否存在抑郁和焦虑症状升高的情况。

灾后八个月,受飓风“艾克”影响的儿童(n = 327,7 - 11岁)完成了PTSD、焦虑和抑郁测量。算法根据DSM-5和ICD-11模型近似得出PTSD诊断。

使用验证性因素分析,ICD-11具有最佳拟合模型,其次是DSM-IV和DSM-5。ICD-11模型在性别上也表现出很强的测量不变性。分析显示,尽管符合任何一组标准的儿童都报告有严重的PTSD症状,但DSM-5和ICD-11之间的重叠性较差。此外,符合DSM-5但不符合ICD-11 PTSD标准的儿童报告的抑郁和一般焦虑水平明显高于不符合DSM-5标准的儿童。

研究结果支持ICD-11针对遭受创伤儿童的PTSD简约模型,尽管DSM-5也获得了足够的拟合度。仅使用一种PTSD模型,无论是DSM-5还是ICD-11,都可能遗漏有显著创伤后应激的儿童。DSM-5可能识别出具有高水平共病症状的儿童,这可能需要额外的临床干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d90d/5399998/c047e3dedfff/zept_a_1310591_f0002_b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d90d/5399998/a23515653d7c/zept_a_1310591_f0001_b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d90d/5399998/c047e3dedfff/zept_a_1310591_f0002_b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d90d/5399998/a23515653d7c/zept_a_1310591_f0001_b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d90d/5399998/c047e3dedfff/zept_a_1310591_f0002_b.jpg

相似文献

1
DSM-5 and ICD-11 as competing models of PTSD in preadolescent children exposed to a natural disaster: assessing validity and co-occurring symptomatology.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)和《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD - 11)作为经历自然灾害的青春期前儿童创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的竞争模型:评估有效性和共病症状学
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Apr 7;8(1):1310591. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1310591. eCollection 2017.
2
DSM-IV, DSM-5, and ICD-11: Identifying children with posttraumatic stress disorder after disasters.DSM-IV、DSM-5 和 ICD-11:在灾难后识别患有创伤后应激障碍的儿童。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;57(12):1444-1452. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12631. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
3
Less is more? Assessing the validity of the ICD-11 model of PTSD across multiple trauma samples.少即是多?评估国际疾病分类第11版创伤后应激障碍模型在多个创伤样本中的有效性。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Oct 7;6:28766. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.28766. eCollection 2015.
4
Genetic pathways to posttraumatic stress disorder and depression in children: Investigation of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met using different PTSD diagnostic models.儿童创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症的遗传途径:使用不同的 PTSD 诊断模型研究儿茶酚-O-甲基转移酶(COMT)Val158Met。
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Jul;102:81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
5
DSM-5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Structure in Disaster-Exposed Adolescents: Stability across Gender and Relation to Behavioral Problems.暴露于灾难中的青少年的DSM-5创伤后应激障碍症状结构:跨性别稳定性及其与行为问题的关系
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017 May;45(4):803-814. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0193-1.
6
Does size really matter? A multisite study assessing the latent structure of the proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for PTSD.规模真的重要吗?一项多地点研究,评估拟议的国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)创伤后应激障碍诊断标准的潜在结构。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Nov 13;8(sup7):1398002. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1398002. eCollection 2017.
7
An evaluation of ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder criteria in two samples of adolescents and young adults exposed to mass shootings: factor analysis and comparisons to ICD-10 and DSM-IV.对遭受大规模枪击事件的青少年和青年两个样本中ICD - 11创伤后应激障碍标准的评估:因素分析以及与ICD - 10和DSM - IV的比较
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 12;16:140. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0849-y.
8
Comparing the dimensional structure and diagnostic algorithms between DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD in children and adolescents.比较 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 儿童和青少年 PTSD 的维度结构和诊断算法。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;27(2):181-190. doi: 10.1007/s00787-017-1032-9. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
9
A comparison of ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria of PTSD among Chinese trauma-exposed adolescent samples.中国遭受创伤的青少年样本中创伤后应激障碍的国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)与精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)标准比较
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 13;14:1186138. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1186138. eCollection 2023.
10
Validation of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷验证创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Sep;136(3):313-322. doi: 10.1111/acps.12771. Epub 2017 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Posttraumatic stress disorder in disaster-exposed youth: examining diagnostic concordance and model fit using ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria.受灾青少年的创伤后应激障碍:使用国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)标准检查诊断一致性和模型拟合度
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jan 11;25(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05317-6.
2
Improving posttraumatic stress disorder assessment in young children: comparing measures and identifying clinically-relevant symptoms in children ages six and under.改善幼儿创伤后应激障碍评估:比较评估工具并确定 6 岁及以下儿童的临床相关症状。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 19;14(1):19179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69692-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Commentary: The evolving conception of posttraumatic stress disorder - reflections on Danzi and La Greca (2016).评论:创伤后应激障碍的演变概念——对丹齐和拉格雷卡(2016年)的思考
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;57(12):1453-1454. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12634.
2
DSM-IV, DSM-5, and ICD-11: Identifying children with posttraumatic stress disorder after disasters.DSM-IV、DSM-5 和 ICD-11:在灾难后识别患有创伤后应激障碍的儿童。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;57(12):1444-1452. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12631. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
3
Less is more? Assessing the validity of the ICD-11 model of PTSD across multiple trauma samples.
Diagnosis of mental disorders using machine learning: Literature review and bibliometric mapping from 2012 to 2023.
使用机器学习诊断精神障碍:2012年至2023年的文献综述与文献计量映射
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 8;10(12):e32548. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32548. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
4
[Posttraumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents: results of a cross-sectional study on the effects of the newly formulated PTSD and CPTSD diagnoses in the ICD-11].[儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍:关于国际疾病分类第11版中创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍新诊断标准影响的横断面研究结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Apr;67(4):409-418. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03860-2. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
5
Does age matter in genetics? The role of ADCYAP1R1 in sex-specific risk for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed preadolescent children.年龄在遗传学中重要吗?ADCYAP1R1 在创伤暴露前青春期儿童创伤后应激障碍的性别特异性风险中的作用。
J Psychiatr Res. 2023 Aug;164:291-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.06.024. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
6
ICD-11 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Complex PTSD Among Hospital Medical Workers in China: Impacts of Wenchuan Earthquake Exposure, Workplaces, and Sociodemographic Factors.中国医院医护人员中的国际疾病分类第11版创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍:汶川地震暴露、工作场所及社会人口学因素的影响
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 17;12:735861. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.735861. eCollection 2021.
7
The network structure of posttraumatic stress disorder among Filipina migrant domestic workers: comorbidity with depression.菲律宾移徙家庭佣工创伤后应激障碍的网络结构:与抑郁共病。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Jul 2;11(1):1765544. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1765544. eCollection 2020.
8
Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population.日本人群中创伤后应激障碍病例的国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)、精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)与以往诊断手册的患病率及共病情况。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 May 19;11(1):1753938. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1753938. eCollection 2020.
9
Five Applications of Narrative Exposure Therapy for Children and Adolescents Presenting With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders.叙事暴露疗法在患有创伤后应激障碍的儿童和青少年中的五种应用
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 19;11:19. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00019. eCollection 2020.
10
A decennial review of psychotraumatology: what did we learn and where are we going?心理创伤学十年回顾:我们学到了什么,又将走向何方?
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Nov 20;10(1):1672948. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1672948. eCollection 2019.
少即是多?评估国际疾病分类第11版创伤后应激障碍模型在多个创伤样本中的有效性。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Oct 7;6:28766. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.28766. eCollection 2015.
4
Testing the dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in a nonclinical trauma-exposed adolescent sample.在一个非临床创伤暴露青少年样本中测试《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍症状的维度结构。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;57(2):204-12. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12462. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
5
The underlying dimensionality of PTSD in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: where are we going?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》中创伤后应激障碍的潜在维度:我们将何去何从?
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 May 19;6:28074. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.28074. eCollection 2015.
6
Multiple victimizations before and after leaving home associated with PTSD, depression, and substance use disorder among homeless youth.离家前后的多次受害经历与无家可归青少年的创伤后应激障碍、抑郁症和物质使用障碍有关。
Child Maltreat. 2015 May;20(2):115-24. doi: 10.1177/1077559514562859. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
7
Impact of the diagnostic changes to post-traumatic stress disorder for DSM-5 and the proposed changes to ICD-11.DSM-5 对创伤后应激障碍的诊断标准变化以及 ICD-11 拟议变化的影响。
Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;205(3):230-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.135285. Epub 2014 May 8.
8
Children's Postdisaster Trajectories of PTS Symptoms: Predicting Chronic Distress.儿童灾后创伤后应激障碍症状的发展轨迹:预测慢性应激。
Child Youth Care Forum. 2013 Aug 1;42(4):351-369. doi: 10.1007/s10566-013-9206-1.
9
Finalizing PTSD in DSM-5: getting here from there and where to go next.DSM-5 中创伤后应激障碍的敲定:从这里到那里,以及下一步的走向。
J Trauma Stress. 2013 Oct;26(5):548-56. doi: 10.1002/jts.21840.
10
Children's risk and resilience following a natural disaster: genetic vulnerability, posttraumatic stress, and depression.儿童在自然灾害后的风险和适应能力:遗传脆弱性、创伤后应激和抑郁。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Dec;151(3):860-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.07.024. Epub 2013 Aug 16.