• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较基于书籍和平板电脑的图片活动时间表:习得与偏好

Comparing Book- and Tablet-Based Picture Activity Schedules: Acquisition and Preference.

作者信息

Giles Aimee, Markham Victoria

机构信息

1 University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK.

出版信息

Behav Modif. 2017 Sep;41(5):647-664. doi: 10.1177/0145445517700817. Epub 2017 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1177/0145445517700817
PMID:28452230
Abstract

Picture activity schedules consist of a sequence of images representing the order of tasks for a person to complete. Although, picture activity schedules have traditionally been presented in a book format, recently picture activity schedules have been evaluated on technological devices such as an iPod™ touch. The present study compared the efficiency of picture activity schedule acquisition on book- and tablet-based modalities. In addition, participant preference for each modality was assessed. Three boys aged below 5 years with a diagnosis of autism participated. Participants were taught to follow the schedules using both modalities. Following mastery of each modality of picture activity schedule, a concurrent-chains preference assessment was conducted to evaluate participant preference for each modality. Differences in acquisition rates across the two modalities were marginal. Preference for book- or tablet-based schedules was idiosyncratic across participants.

摘要

图片活动日程表由一系列代表个人要完成任务顺序的图像组成。虽然传统上图片活动日程表是以书本形式呈现的,但最近也在诸如iPod™ touch等技术设备上对图片活动日程表进行了评估。本研究比较了基于书本和基于平板电脑两种形式获取图片活动日程表的效率。此外,还评估了参与者对每种形式的偏好。三名年龄在5岁以下、被诊断为自闭症的男孩参与了研究。参与者学习使用两种形式来遵循日程表。在掌握了图片活动日程表的每种形式后,进行了并发链偏好评估,以评估参与者对每种形式的偏好。两种形式的获取率差异很小。参与者对基于书本或平板电脑的日程表的偏好因人而异。

相似文献

1
Comparing Book- and Tablet-Based Picture Activity Schedules: Acquisition and Preference.比较基于书籍和平板电脑的图片活动时间表:习得与偏好
Behav Modif. 2017 Sep;41(5):647-664. doi: 10.1177/0145445517700817. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
2
The effects of work-reinforcer schedules on skill acquisition for children with autism.工作强化时间表对自闭症儿童技能习得的影响。
Behav Modif. 2015 Jul;39(4):600-21. doi: 10.1177/0145445515583246. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
3
An evaluation of preference for video and in vivo modeling.视频和体内建模偏好评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Summer;43(2):279-83. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-279.
4
Evaluating Efficacy and Preference for Prompt Type During Discrete-Trial Teaching.评价离散试教中即时提示类型的效果和偏好。
Behav Modif. 2020 Jan;44(1):49-69. doi: 10.1177/0145445518792245. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
5
Teaching multi-step requesting and social communication to two children with autism spectrum disorders with three AAC options.使用三种 AAC 选项对两名自闭症谱系障碍儿童进行多步骤请求和社会沟通教学。
Augment Altern Commun. 2013 Sep;29(3):222-34. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2013.815801. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
6
Teaching on-task and on-schedule behaviors to high-functioning children with autism via picture activity schedules.通过图片活动时间表向高功能自闭症儿童教授任务执行和按时完成行为。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2000 Dec;30(6):553-67. doi: 10.1023/a:1005687310346.
7
Using activity schedules to promote varied application use in children with autism.使用活动时间表来促进自闭症儿童多样化应用程序的使用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Jan;51(1):80-86. doi: 10.1002/jaba.435.
8
The effects of work-reinforcer schedules on performance and preference in students with autism.工作强化时间表对自闭症学生的表现和偏好的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):215-20. doi: 10.1002/jaba.188. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
9
A comparison of picture and GIF-based preference assessments for social interaction.图片和 GIF 偏好评估在社交互动中的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jul;53(3):1452-1465. doi: 10.1002/jaba.680. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
An evaluation of choice on instructional efficacy and individual preferences among children with autism.对自闭症儿童教学效果和个人偏好方面选择的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Mar;49(1):170-5. doi: 10.1002/jaba.263. Epub 2015 Oct 28.