• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患儿及其家长对儿童癌症支持性护理的看法。

Patients' and parents' views regarding supportive care in childhood cancer.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2017 Oct;25(10):3151-3160. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3723-7. Epub 2017 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-017-3723-7
PMID:28456909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5577054/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Intensive therapies in pediatric malignancies increased survival rates but also occurrence of treatment-related morbidities. Therefore, supportive care fulfills an increasingly important role. In planning development of guidelines with incorporation of shared decision making, we noticed that little is known about the needs and preferences of patients and their parents. Our goals were therefore to investigate (1) which supportive care topics patients and parents regard as most important and (2) the preferred role they wish to fulfill in decision making.

METHODS

This qualitative study consisted of three focus groups (two traditional, one online) with patients and parents of two Dutch pediatric oncology centers. Data were transcribed as simple verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven adolescent patients and 18 parents shared detailed views on various aspects of supportive care. Themes of major importance were communication between patient and physician (commitment, accessibility, proactive attitude of physicians), well-timed provision of information, and the suitability and accessibility of psychosocial care. In contrast to prioritized supportive care topics by medical professionals, somatic issues (e.g., febrile neutropenia) were infrequently addressed. Patients and parents preferred to be actively involved in decision making in selected topics, such as choice of analgesics and anti-emetics, but not in, e.g., choice of antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with cancer and parents were provided a valuable insight into their views regarding supportive care and shared decision making. These results have important implications towards improving supportive care, both in selecting topics for guideline development and incorporating preferences of patients and parents herein.

摘要

目的

儿科恶性肿瘤的强化治疗提高了生存率,但也增加了治疗相关的发病率。因此,支持性护理发挥着越来越重要的作用。在制定纳入共同决策的指南时,我们注意到,患者及其父母的需求和偏好知之甚少。因此,我们的目标是调查(1)患者和家长认为哪些支持性护理主题最重要,以及(2)他们希望在决策中扮演的角色。

方法

本定性研究包括来自荷兰两个儿科肿瘤中心的 11 名青少年患者和 18 名家长参加的三个焦点小组(两个传统小组,一个在线小组)。数据以简单的逐字记录转录,并使用主题分析进行分析。

结果

11 名青少年患者和 18 名家长详细分享了他们对支持性护理各个方面的看法。最重要的主题是医患之间的沟通(承诺、可及性、医生的积极态度)、及时提供信息,以及心理社会护理的适宜性和可及性。与医疗专业人员优先考虑的支持性护理主题相比,躯体问题(如发热性中性粒细胞减少症)很少被提及。患者和家长更愿意在选定的主题中积极参与决策,例如选择镇痛药和止吐药,但不愿意在抗生素的选择等方面参与决策。

结论

本研究为儿童癌症患者及其家长提供了有关支持性护理和共同决策的宝贵意见。这些结果对于改善支持性护理具有重要意义,包括为指南制定选择主题以及纳入患者和家长的偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5577054/7a751e66bc17/520_2017_3723_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5577054/7a751e66bc17/520_2017_3723_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5577054/7a751e66bc17/520_2017_3723_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' and parents' views regarding supportive care in childhood cancer.患儿及其家长对儿童癌症支持性护理的看法。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Oct;25(10):3151-3160. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3723-7. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
2
Decision making in pediatric oncology: Views of parents and physicians in two European countries.儿科肿瘤学中的决策制定:两个欧洲国家父母与医生的观点
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):21-31. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1234519. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
3
Putting patient participation into practice in pediatrics-results from a qualitative study in pediatric oncology.将患者参与应用于儿科实践——儿科肿瘤学定性研究的结果
Eur J Pediatr. 2016 Sep;175(9):1147-1155. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2754-2. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
4
Parents' decision-making preferences in pediatric oncology: the relationship to health care involvement and complementary therapy use.儿科肿瘤学中父母的决策偏好:与医疗保健参与及补充疗法使用的关系。
Psychooncology. 2003 Jul-Aug;12(5):442-52. doi: 10.1002/pon.655.
5
Parents' and Physicians' Perceptions of Children's Participation in Decision-making in Paediatric Oncology: A Quantitative Study.父母与医生对儿童参与儿科肿瘤决策的看法:一项定量研究。
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Dec;14(4):555-565. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9813-x. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
6
Young patients', parents', and survivors' communication preferences in paediatric oncology: results of online focus groups.儿科肿瘤学中青年患者、家长及幸存者的沟通偏好:在线焦点小组结果
BMC Pediatr. 2007 Nov 9;7:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-7-35.
7
Bereaved parents' perspectives on pediatric palliative care.丧亲父母对儿童姑息治疗的看法。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2012;8(4):316-38. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2012.732023.
8
Professionals' preferences in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability: a nationwide qualitative Dutch study.生存极限下产前咨询中专业人员的偏好:一项荷兰全国性定性研究
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Aug;176(8):1107-1119. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2952-6. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
9
Parental decision making in pediatric cancer end-of-life care: using focus group methodology as a prephase to seek participant design input.儿科癌症临终关怀中的家长决策:运用焦点小组方法作为前期阶段以寻求参与者设计意见。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2006 Jul;10(3):198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.11.003. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
10
Sharing decisions during diagnostic consultations; an observational study in pediatric oncology.诊断咨询过程中的共同决策;儿科肿瘤学的一项观察性研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jan;99(1):61-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the "shared" in shared decision-making in the care for children with chronic diseases or disabilities: what are the roles of parents and professionals?探索慢性病或残疾儿童护理中共同决策里的“共同”因素:父母和专业人员分别扮演什么角色?
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec 19;184(1):91. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05930-8.
2
A Multidisciplinary Consensus-Building Exercise to Define and Prioritize Topics in Supportive Care of Children With Cancer at a Global Level.一项多学科共识制定工作,旨在定义和优先考虑全球范围内儿童癌症支持性护理的相关议题。
Cancer Med. 2024 Nov;13(21):e70377. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70377.
3
Hospital healthcare experiences of children and young people with life-threatening or life-shortening conditions, and their parents: scoping reviews and resultant conceptual frameworks.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of clinical practice guidelines for supportive care in childhood cancer--prioritization of topics using a Delphi approach.儿童癌症支持性护理临床实践指南的制定——采用德尔菲法确定主题优先级
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jul;23(7):1987-95. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2559-7. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
2
Implementing and evaluating shared decision making in oncology practice.在肿瘤学实践中实施和评估共享决策。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Nov-Dec;64(6):377-88. doi: 10.3322/caac.21245. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
3
Pediatric psycho-oncology care: standards, guidelines, and consensus reports.
危及生命或生命有限的儿童和青少年及其父母的医院医疗保健体验:范围综述及由此产生的概念框架。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Jul 17;23(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04151-6.
4
Factors of well-being of youth with complex medical conditions from the experience of hospitalization and convalescence: A pilot study.患有复杂疾病的青年在住院和康复期间的幸福感因素:一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2023 May 4;18(5):e0285213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285213. eCollection 2023.
5
Palliative care for adolescents and young adults with advanced illness: A scoping review.晚期疾病青少年和年轻成人的姑息治疗:范围综述。
Palliat Med. 2023 Jan;37(1):88-107. doi: 10.1177/02692163221136160. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
6
Lived experiences with unmet supportive care needs in pediatric cancer: Perspective of Chinese children and their parents.儿童癌症患者未满足的支持性护理需求的生活经历:中国儿童及其父母的视角
Int J Nurs Sci. 2022 Sep 9;9(4):430-437. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.09.001. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
'Share your views'-international consultation informs a patient engagement strategy for the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer.“分享您的观点”-国际咨询会议为癌症支持治疗多国协会的患者参与策略提供信息。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec;30(12):9953-9961. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07366-y. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
8
Information needs of children with leukemia and their parents' perspectives of their information needs: a qualitative study.白血病患儿及其家长的信息需求及家长对患儿信息需求的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Jul 13;22(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03478-w.
9
Physician decision-making process about withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in paediatric patients: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.儿科患者生命维持治疗的 withholding/withdrawing 决策:定性证据的系统评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jun 24;21(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01003-5.
10
Day-to-Day Decision Making by Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer.青少年和青年癌症患者的日常决策。
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Nurs. 2022 Sep-Oct;39(5):290-303. doi: 10.1177/27527530211068718. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
儿科心理肿瘤学护理:标准、指南与共识报告。
Psychooncology. 2015 Feb;24(2):204-11. doi: 10.1002/pon.3589. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
4
Children's participation in shared decision-making: children, adolescents, parents and healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences.儿童参与共同决策:儿童、青少年、家长及医疗保健专业人员的观点与经验
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Jun;18(3):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
5
Childhood and adolescent cancer statistics, 2014.儿童和青少年癌症统计数据,2014 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Mar-Apr;64(2):83-103. doi: 10.3322/caac.21219. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
6
Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: results of EUROCARE-5--a population-based study.欧洲 1999-2007 年儿童癌症生存情况:EUROCARE-5 的研究结果——一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jan;15(1):35-47. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70548-5. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
7
Guideline for the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting due to antineoplastic medication in pediatric cancer patients.儿童癌症患者抗肿瘤药物所致急性恶心呕吐的预防指南。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013 Jul;60(7):1073-82. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24508. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
8
Guideline for the management of fever and neutropenia in children with cancer and/or undergoing hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.儿童癌症患者和/或接受造血干细胞移植后发热与中性粒细胞减少的管理指南。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 10;30(35):4427-38. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.7161. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
9
Information-seeking behaviours and decision-making process of parents of children with cancer.癌症患儿家长的信息寻求行为和决策过程。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Apr;17(2):176-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
10
What is known about parents' treatment decisions? A narrative review of pediatric decision making.关于父母的治疗决策,我们了解哪些?对儿科决策制定的叙述性综述。
Med Decis Making. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):246-58. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11421528. Epub 2011 Oct 3.