Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Research Methodology and Biostatistics Core, College of Medicine Office of Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Cancer Med. 2024 Nov;13(21):e70377. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70377.
Optimal outcomes during childhood cancer treatment require effective management of toxicities, often called supportive care. A lack of agreement on what comprises supportive care limits the development and provision of comprehensive guidance (for this work, we have defined supportive care as any disease- or treatment-related condition experienced by children with cancer, excluding psychosocial conditions, palliative care, survivorship, or procedural topics). To address this gap, we conducted a consensus-building exercise among global experts to define and prioritize topics for supportive care.
Two rounds of brainstorming and prioritization exercises were conducted. A multidisciplinary panel nominated by professional societies and cooperative groups was formed to ensure geographic and resource representation using snowball sampling. An internal expert panel generated an initial list of supportive care topics. In round one, the multidisciplinary panel reviewed the initial list and recommended additional topics, followed by prioritization in round two using a seven-point Likert scale. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics.
The multidisciplinary panel consisted of 57 members representing 32 countries. The initial list included 46 topics; 161 additional topics were suggested. After removing duplicates and out-of-scope additions, the final list contained 62 topics. Febrile neutropenia, sepsis, bloodstream infections, and pain were ranked highest priority. Mortality, morbidity, and frequency of the event were identified as the most important factors influencing prioritization.
Through a multidisciplinary and globally representative process, we identified core supportive care topics and factors influencing their prioritization for childhood cancer. Outputs from this work will inform efforts to generate resource-adapted recommendations for a global audience. This supports ongoing WHO CureAll work to develop a health systems-level policy brief of supportive care requirements in the management of children with cancer.
儿童癌症治疗期间需要有效管理毒性,通常称为支持性护理。由于缺乏对支持性护理包括哪些内容的共识,限制了全面指导意见的制定和提供(在这项工作中,我们将支持性护理定义为癌症儿童经历的任何与疾病或治疗相关的状况,不包括社会心理状况、姑息治疗、生存或程序主题)。为了解决这一差距,我们在全球专家中进行了一项共识制定活动,以定义和确定支持性护理的优先事项。
进行了两轮头脑风暴和优先级排序练习。通过滚雪球抽样,由专业协会和合作团体提名的多学科小组成立,以确保地理和资源代表性。一个内部专家小组提出了支持性护理主题的初始清单。在第一轮中,多学科小组审查了初始清单并提出了其他主题,然后在第二轮中使用七点李克特量表进行优先级排序。结果使用描述性统计进行总结。
多学科小组由 57 名代表 32 个国家的成员组成。初始清单包括 46 个主题;建议了 161 个额外主题。在删除重复项和超出范围的内容后,最终清单包含 62 个主题。发热性中性粒细胞减少症、脓毒症、血流感染和疼痛被列为最高优先级。死亡率、发病率和事件的频率被确定为影响优先级排序的最重要因素。
通过多学科和全球代表性的过程,我们确定了核心支持性护理主题以及影响其为儿童癌症患者进行优先级排序的因素。这项工作的成果将为努力为全球受众制定资源适应的建议提供信息。这支持了世界卫生组织 CureAll 正在进行的工作,即为癌症儿童管理制定支持性护理需求的卫生系统政策简报。