Truntzer Jeremy N, Triana Brian, Harris Alex H S, Baker Laurence, Chou Loretta, Kamal Robin N
From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Truntzer, Mr. Triana, Dr. Chou, and Dr. Kamal), the Department of Surgery (Dr. Harris), and the Department of Health Research and Policy (Dr. Baker), Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, and the Center for Innovation to Implementation, Palo Alto Health Care System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, CA (Dr. Harris).
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Jun;25(6):449-457. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00553.
Outcomes of nonsurgical management of acute Achilles tendon rupture have been demonstrated to be noninferior to those of surgical management. We performed a cost-minimization analysis of surgical and nonsurgical management of acute Achilles tendon rupture.
We used a claims database to identify patients who underwent surgical (n = 1,979) and nonsurgical (n = 3,065) management of acute Achilles tendon rupture and compared overall costs of treatment (surgical procedure, follow-up care, physical therapy, and management of complications). Complication rates were also calculated. Patients were followed for 1 year after injury.
Average treatment costs in the year after initial diagnosis were higher for patients who underwent initial surgical treatment than for patients who underwent nonsurgical treatment ($4,292 for surgical treatment versus $2,432 for nonsurgical treatment; P < 0.001). However, surgical treatment required fewer office visits (4.52 versus 10.98; P < 0.001) and less spending on physical therapy ($595 versus $928; P < 0.001). Rates of rerupture requiring subsequent treatment (2.1% versus 2.4%; P = 0.34) and additional costs ($2,950 versus $2,515; P = 0.34) were not significantly different regardless whether initial treatment was surgical or nonsurgical. In both cohorts, management of complications contributed to approximately 5% of the total cost.
From the payer's perspective, the overall costs of nonsurgical management of acute Achilles tendon rupture were significantly lower than the overall costs of surgical management.
III, Economic Decision Analysis.
急性跟腱断裂非手术治疗的结果已被证明不劣于手术治疗。我们对急性跟腱断裂的手术和非手术治疗进行了成本最小化分析。
我们使用一个索赔数据库来识别接受急性跟腱断裂手术治疗(n = 1979)和非手术治疗(n = 3065)的患者,并比较治疗的总成本(手术过程、后续护理、物理治疗和并发症管理)。还计算了并发症发生率。患者在受伤后随访1年。
初次诊断后一年,接受初次手术治疗的患者的平均治疗成本高于接受非手术治疗的患者(手术治疗为4292美元,非手术治疗为2432美元;P < 0.001)。然而,手术治疗所需的门诊次数较少(4.52次对10.98次;P < 0.001),物理治疗费用也较低(595美元对928美元;P < 0.001)。无论初始治疗是手术还是非手术,需要后续治疗的再断裂率(2.1%对2.4%;P = 0.34)和额外费用(2950美元对2515美元;P = 0.34)均无显著差异。在两个队列中,并发症管理约占总成本的5%。
从支付方的角度来看'急性跟腱断裂非手术治疗的总成本显著低于手术治疗的总成本。
III,经济决策分析。