Murdock Christopher J, Ochuba Arinze J, Xu Amy L, Snow Morgan, Bronheim Rachel, Vulcano Ettore, Aiyer Amiethab A
The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Orthopaedic Surgery, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mount Sinai Medical Center, Orthopaedic Surgery, Miami, FL, USA.
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2023 Mar 8;8(1):24730114231156410. doi: 10.1177/24730114231156410. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is a common injury with a growing incidence rate. Treatment is either operative or nonoperative. However, evidence is lacking on the cost comparison between these modalities. The objective of this study is to investigate the cost differences between operative and nonoperative treatment of ATR using a large national database.
Patients who received treatment for an ATR were abstracted from the large national commercial insurance claims database, Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (n = 100 825) and divided into nonoperative (n = 75 731) and operative (n = 25 094) cohorts. Demographics, location, and health care charges were compared using multivariable regression analysis. Subanalysis of costs for medical services including clinic visits, imaging studies, opioid usage, and physical therapy were conducted. Patients who underwent secondary repair were excluded.
Operative treatment was associated with increased net and total payments, coinsurance, copayment, deductible, coordination of benefits (COB) / savings, greater number of clinic visits, radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, and physical therapy (PT) sessions, and with higher net costs due to clinic visits, radiographs, MRIs, and PT ( < .001). Operative repair at an ambulatory surgical center was associated with a lower net and total payment, and a significantly higher deductible compared to in-hospital settings ( < .001). Both cohorts received similar numbers of opioid prescriptions during the study period. Yet, operative patients had a significantly shorter duration of opioid use. After controlling for confounders, operative repair was also independently associated with lower net costs due to opioid prescriptions.
Compared with nonoperatively managed ATR, surgical repair is associated with greater costs partially because of greater utilization of clinic visits, imaging, and physical therapy sessions. However, surgical costs may be reduced when procedures are performed in ambulatory surgery centers vs hospital facilities. Nonoperative treatment is associated with higher prescription costs secondary to longer duration of opioid use.
Level III, retrospective cohort study.
跟腱断裂(ATR)是一种常见损伤,发病率呈上升趋势。治疗方法包括手术治疗和非手术治疗。然而,关于这两种治疗方式成本比较的证据尚不充分。本研究的目的是利用一个大型全国性数据库调查跟腱断裂手术治疗与非手术治疗的成本差异。
从大型全国商业保险理赔数据库Marketscan商业理赔与病历数据库(n = 100825)中提取接受跟腱断裂治疗的患者,并分为非手术组(n = 75731)和手术组(n = 25094)。使用多变量回归分析比较人口统计学特征、治疗地点和医疗费用。对包括门诊就诊、影像学检查、阿片类药物使用和物理治疗在内的医疗服务费用进行亚组分析。排除接受二次修复的患者。
手术治疗与净支付和总支付增加、共保、自付、免赔额、协调福利(COB)/节省费用、更多的门诊就诊次数、X光片、磁共振成像(MRI)扫描和物理治疗(PT)疗程相关,并且由于门诊就诊、X光片、MRI和PT导致的净成本更高(P <.001)。与住院环境相比,在门诊手术中心进行手术修复的净支付和总支付较低,免赔额显著更高(P <.001)。在研究期间,两组患者的阿片类药物处方数量相似。然而,手术患者的阿片类药物使用持续时间明显较短。在控制混杂因素后,手术修复还与阿片类药物处方导致的较低净成本独立相关。
与非手术治疗的跟腱断裂相比,手术修复成本更高,部分原因是门诊就诊、影像学检查和物理治疗疗程的利用率更高。然而,与医院设施相比,在门诊手术中心进行手术时手术成本可能会降低。非手术治疗因阿片类药物使用时间较长而导致处方成本较高。
III级,回顾性队列研究。