• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The impact of home care nurses' numeracy and graph literacy on comprehension of visual display information: implications for dashboard design.家庭护理护士的计算能力和图表读写能力对理解视觉显示信息的影响:对仪表板设计的启示。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):175-182. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx042.
2
Does Level of Numeracy and Graph Literacy Impact Comprehension of Quality Targets? Findings from a Survey of Home Care Nurses.算术能力和图表素养水平会影响对质量目标的理解吗?一项针对家庭护理护士的调查结果
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:635-640. eCollection 2017.
3
Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient-centered communication tools.图表素养在以患者为中心的沟通工具开发中的相关性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Mar;99(3):448-454. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
4
Nurses' Numeracy and Graphical Literacy: Informing Studies of Clinical Decision Support Interfaces.护士的数字运算能力和图形理解能力:为临床决策支持界面的研究提供信息。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2016 Apr-Jun;31(2):124-30. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000149.
5
Graph literacy matters: Examining the association between graph literacy, health literacy, and numeracy in a Medicaid eligible population.图形阅读能力很重要:在符合医疗补助条件的人群中,考察图形阅读能力、健康素养和计算能力之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 11;15(11):e0241844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241844. eCollection 2020.
6
Preference for and understanding of graphs presenting health risk information. The role of age, health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy.偏好和理解呈现健康风险信息的图表。年龄、健康素养、计算能力和图表素养的作用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jan;104(1):109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.031. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
7
Comparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: Results from an online, randomized study.比较图标数组与条形图对风险信息偏好和理解的影响:来自在线随机研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 23;16(7):e0253644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253644. eCollection 2021.
8
Using Feedback Intervention Theory to Guide Clinical Dashboard Design.运用反馈干预理论指导临床仪表盘设计。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:395-403. eCollection 2018.
9
Correlating reading comprehension and health numeracy among adults with low literacy.研究低文化程度成年人的阅读理解和健康算数能力的相关性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jul;84(1):132-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.030. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
10
Health literacy, numeracy, and interpretation of graphical breast cancer risk estimates.健康素养、计算能力与图形化乳腺癌风险估计的解读。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Apr;83(1):92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.027.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance Summary Display Ontology: Feedback intervention content, delivery, and interpreted information.绩效总结显示本体:反馈干预内容、传递方式及解释信息。
CEUR Workshop Proc. 2022 Sep;3805:L1-L10.
2
Precision feedback: A conceptual model.精准反馈:一个概念模型。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Apr 9;8(3):e10419. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10419. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Designing Support to help Health Communication Professionals Convey Numbers Clearly to the Public - A Needs Assessment and Formative Usability Evaluation.设计支持以帮助健康传播专业人员向公众清晰传达数字 - 需求评估和形成性可用性评估。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024 Jan 11;2023:1277-1286. eCollection 2023.
4
Inpatient nurses' preferences and decisions with risk information visualization.住院护士对风险信息可视化的偏好和决策。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Dec 22;31(1):61-69. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad209.
5
Examining Care Planning Efficiency and Clinical Decision Support Adoption in a System Tailoring to Nurses' Graph Literacy: National, Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.考察在专为护士图形读写能力定制的系统中,护理计划效率和临床决策支持采用情况:全国性、基于网络的随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 11;25:e45043. doi: 10.2196/45043.
6
Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review.老年护理中临床仪表板的可用性与可接受性:系统评价
JMIR Aging. 2023 Jun 19;6:e42274. doi: 10.2196/42274.
7
Nurses' preferences for the format of care planning clinical decision support coded with standardized nursing languages.护士对使用标准化护理语言编码的护理计划临床决策支持格式的偏好。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Oct 19;30(11):1846-1851. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad093.
8
Situation Awareness-Oriented Dashboard in ICUs in Support of Resource Management in Time of Pandemics.面向 ICU 资源管理的态势感知仪表盘在大流行期间的支持。
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2023 Jan 31;11:151-160. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2023.3241215. eCollection 2023.
9
A Scalable Service to Improve Health Care Quality Through Precision Audit and Feedback: Proposal for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项通过精准审核与反馈提高医疗质量的可扩展服务:随机对照试验提案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 10;11(5):e34990. doi: 10.2196/34990.
10
Conducting a representative national randomized control trial of tailored clinical decision support for nurses remotely: Methods and implications.开展具有代表性的全国随机对照试验,对护士进行远程定制临床决策支持:方法与意义。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Jul;118:106712. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106712. Epub 2022 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The Nurse Watch: Design and Evaluation of a Smart Watch Application with Vital Sign Monitoring and Checklist Reminders.护士手表:一款具有生命体征监测和清单提醒功能的智能手表应用程序的设计与评估。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:314-9. eCollection 2015.
2
Nurses' Numeracy and Graphical Literacy: Informing Studies of Clinical Decision Support Interfaces.护士的数字运算能力和图形理解能力:为临床决策支持界面的研究提供信息。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2016 Apr-Jun;31(2):124-30. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000149.
3
Dashboards for improving patient care: review of the literature.用于改善患者护理的仪表盘:文献综述
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Feb;84(2):87-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
4
Use of handheld computers in clinical practice: a systematic review.手持计算机在临床实践中的应用:一项系统综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Jul 6;14:56. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-56.
5
Understanding visualization by understanding individual users.通过了解个体用户来理解可视化。
IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2012 Nov-Dec;32(6):88-94. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2012.120.
6
Use of mobile devices in the emergency department: A scoping review.移动设备在急诊科的应用:一项范围综述。
Health Informatics J. 2015 Dec;21(4):306-15. doi: 10.1177/1460458214530137. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
7
Risk factors for hospitalization in a national sample of medicare home health care patients.医疗保险家庭医疗患者全国样本中住院治疗的风险因素。
J Appl Gerontol. 2014 Jun;33(4):474-93. doi: 10.1177/0733464812454007. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
8
Visualizing variations in organizational safety culture across an inter-hospital multifaceted workforce.跨医院多层面员工群体可视化组织安全文化的差异。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Jun;20(3):273-80. doi: 10.1111/jep.12123. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
9
Health literacy, numeracy, and graphical literacy among veterans in primary care and their effect on shared decision making and trust in physicians.基层医疗中的退伍军人健康素养、计算素养和图形素养及其对共同决策和对医生信任的影响。
J Health Commun. 2013;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):273-89. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.829137.
10
E-health blood pressure control program.电子健康血压控制程序
J Med Pract Manage. 2012 Sep-Oct;28(2):91-100.

家庭护理护士的计算能力和图表读写能力对理解视觉显示信息的影响:对仪表板设计的启示。

The impact of home care nurses' numeracy and graph literacy on comprehension of visual display information: implications for dashboard design.

机构信息

Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.

Center for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):175-182. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx042.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocx042
PMID:28460091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647125/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore home care nurses' numeracy and graph literacy and their relationship to comprehension of visualized data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multifactorial experimental design using online survey software. Nurses were recruited from 2 Medicare-certified home health agencies. Numeracy and graph literacy were measured using validated scales. Nurses were randomized to 1 of 4 experimental conditions. Each condition displayed data for 1 of 4 quality indicators, in 1 of 4 different visualized formats (bar graph, line graph, spider graph, table). A mixed linear model measured the impact of numeracy, graph literacy, and display format on data understanding.

RESULTS

In all, 195 nurses took part in the study. They were slightly more numerate and graph literate than the general population. Overall, nurses understood information presented in bar graphs most easily (88% correct), followed by tables (81% correct), line graphs (77% correct), and spider graphs (41% correct). Individuals with low numeracy and low graph literacy had poorer comprehension of information displayed across all formats. High graph literacy appeared to enhance comprehension of data regardless of numeracy capabilities.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Clinical dashboards are increasingly used to provide information to clinicians in visualized format, under the assumption that visual display reduces cognitive workload. Results of this study suggest that nurses' comprehension of visualized information is influenced by their numeracy, graph literacy, and the display format of the data. Individual differences in numeracy and graph literacy skills need to be taken into account when designing dashboard technology.

摘要

目的

探讨家庭护理护士的计算能力和图表素养及其与可视化数据理解的关系。

材料和方法

采用多因素实验设计,使用在线调查软件。从 2 家经医疗保险认证的家庭健康机构招募护士。使用经过验证的量表测量计算能力和图表素养。护士被随机分配到 4 个实验条件之一。每个条件显示 4 个质量指标中的 1 个,以 4 种不同的可视化格式(条形图、线图、蜘蛛图、表格)之一显示数据。混合线性模型测量了计算能力、图表素养和显示格式对数据理解的影响。

结果

共有 195 名护士参加了这项研究。他们的计算能力和图表素养略高于一般人群。总的来说,护士最容易理解条形图呈现的信息(88%正确),其次是表格(81%正确)、线图(77%正确)和蜘蛛图(41%正确)。计算能力和图表素养较低的个体对所有格式呈现的信息理解能力较差。高图表素养似乎增强了无论计算能力如何对数据的理解能力。

讨论与结论

临床仪表板越来越多地用于以可视化格式向临床医生提供信息,假设视觉显示可以减轻认知工作量。这项研究的结果表明,护士对可视化信息的理解受到其计算能力、图表素养和数据显示格式的影响。在设计仪表板技术时,需要考虑计算能力和图表素养技能的个体差异。