文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review.

作者信息

Siette Joyce, Dodds Laura, Sharifi Fariba, Nguyen Amy, Baysari Melissa, Seaman Karla, Raban Magdalena, Wabe Nasir, Westbrook Johanna

机构信息

The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Westmead, Australia.

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Aging. 2023 Jun 19;6:e42274. doi: 10.2196/42274.


DOI:10.2196/42274
PMID:37335599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10334718/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of clinical dashboards in aged care systems to support performance review and improve outcomes for older adults receiving care is increasing. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to explore evidence from studies of the acceptability and usability of clinical dashboards including their visual features and functionalities in aged care settings. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using 5 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) from inception to April 2022. Studies were included in the review if they were conducted in aged care environments (home-based community care, retirement villages, and long-term care) and reported a usability or acceptability evaluation of a clinical dashboard for use in aged care environments, including specific dashboard visual features (eg, a qualitative summary of individual user experience or metrics from a usability scale). Two researchers independently reviewed the articles and extracted the data. Data synthesis was performed via narrative review, and the risk of bias was measured using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: In total, 14 articles reporting on 12 dashboards were included. The quality of the articles varied. There was considerable heterogeneity in implementation setting (home care 8/14, 57%), dashboard user groups (health professionals 9/14, 64%), and sample size (range 3-292). Dashboard features included a visual representation of information (eg, medical condition prevalence), analytic capability (eg, predictive), and others (eg, stakeholder communication). Dashboard usability was mixed (4 dashboards rated as high), and dashboard acceptability was high for 9 dashboards. Most users considered dashboards to be informative, relevant, and functional, highlighting the use and intention of using this resource in the future. Dashboards that had the presence of one or more of these features (bar charts, radio buttons, checkboxes or other symbols, interactive displays, and reporting capabilities) were found to be highly acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive summary of clinical dashboards used in aged care is provided to inform future dashboard development, testing, and implementation. Further research is required to optimize visualization features, usability, and acceptability of dashboards in aged care.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a91/10334718/ef8649a42396/aging_v6i1e42274_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a91/10334718/e8971a6c4e9e/aging_v6i1e42274_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a91/10334718/ef8649a42396/aging_v6i1e42274_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a91/10334718/e8971a6c4e9e/aging_v6i1e42274_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a91/10334718/ef8649a42396/aging_v6i1e42274_fig2.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review.

JMIR Aging. 2023-6-19

[2]
Dashboards in Health Care Settings: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

JMIR Res Protoc. 2022-3-2

[3]
Usability Testing of an Interactive Dashboard for Surgical Quality Improvement in a Large Congenital Heart Center.

Appl Clin Inform. 2019-11-13

[4]
Usability Evaluation of Dashboards: A Systematic Literature Review of Tools.

Biomed Res Int. 2023

[5]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

[6]
The Impact of Visualization Dashboards on Quality of Care and Clinician Satisfaction: Integrative Literature Review.

JMIR Hum Factors. 2018-5-31

[7]
Developing a Data Dashboard Framework for Population Health Surveillance: Widening Access to Clinical Trial Findings.

JMIR Form Res. 2019-4-4

[8]
Developing an Intranet-Based Lymphedema Dashboard for Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Teams: Design Research Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-4-21

[9]
National Public Health Dashboards: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024-5-16

[10]
Design, Usability, and Acceptability of a Needs-Based, Automated Dashboard to Provide Individualized Patient-Care Data to Pediatric Residents.

Appl Clin Inform. 2022-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Creating Interactive Data Dashboards for Evidence Syntheses.

Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025-6-25

[2]
RemoteHealthConnect: Innovating patient monitoring with wearable technology and custom visualization.

Digit Health. 2024-12-10

[3]
Development, Implementation, and Evaluation Methods for Dashboards in Health Care: Scoping Review.

JMIR Med Inform. 2024-12-10

[4]
Using co-design to understand consumer's health information-seeking behaviours and design preferences for a new digital clinical dashboard in aged care.

BMC Geriatr. 2024-12-4

[5]
Human Factors, Human-Centered Design, and Usability of Sensor-Based Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-11-15

[6]
'Technology in end-of-life care is very important': the view of nurses regarding technology and end-of-life care.

BMC Nurs. 2024-11-6

[7]
Impact of visualising healthcare quality performance: a systematic review.

BMJ Open. 2024-11-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
'It enables the carers to see the person first': Qualitative evaluation of point-of-care digital management system in residential aged care.

J Clin Nurs. 2023-1

[2]
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.

BMJ. 2021-9-30

[3]
Usability and acceptability of internet-based interventions for family carers of people living with dementia: systematic review.

Aging Ment Health. 2022-10

[4]
Co-designing a dashboard of predictive analytics and decision support to drive care quality and client outcomes in aged care: a mixed-method study protocol.

BMJ Open. 2021-8-25

[5]
Transforming routinely collected residential aged care provider data into timely information: Current and future directions.

Australas J Ageing. 2021-9

[6]
The impact on health outcomes of implementing electronic health records to support the care of older people in residential aged care: A scoping review.

Int J Med Inform. 2021-7

[7]
Application of In-Home Monitoring Data to Transition Decisions in Continuing Care Retirement Communities: Usability Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2021-1-13

[8]
A pharmacist-led pilot using a performance dashboard to improve psychotropic medication use in a skilled nursing facility.

BMJ Open Qual. 2020-8

[9]
Staff perspectives on the usability of electronic patient records for planning and delivering dementia care in nursing homes: a multiple case study.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020-7-13

[10]
Health literacy training for Australian home care workers: Enablers and barriers.

Home Health Care Serv Q. 2019

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索