Suppr超能文献

威胁固视性青光眼患者10-2 MAIA微视野检查的学期间重测变异性

Intersession test-retest variability of 10-2 MAIA microperimetry in fixation-threatening glaucoma.

作者信息

Wong Evan N, Morgan William H, Chen Fred K

机构信息

Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Incorporating Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia.

Department of Ophthalmology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr 20;11:745-752. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S131371. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the intersession test-retest variability (TRV) of CenterVue Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimeter in glaucoma patients with fixation-threatening field defects.

METHODS

This is a prospective case-control study of 27 participants consisting of 13 patients with stable primary open-angle glaucoma and 14 control subjects including 5 healthy individuals and 9 retinal patients (5 with non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration and 4 with inherited retinal disease). Each participant underwent three microperimetry tests in one eye at 1-month intervals. Each test used an identical test strategy of 10-2 Cartesian grid and 4-2 staircase algorithm. We investigated TRV by calculating the coefficient of repeatability (CR) for mean sensitivity (MS) and point-wise sensitivity (PWS) for glaucomatous subjects and retinal and normal subjects. 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CRs were calculated.

RESULTS

There was no significant change in MS, and the median durations of microperimetry sessions were 9'26″, 8'52″, and 8'46″ across the three study visits. The intersession CRs for MS were 1.1, 2.5, and 1.8 dB, and the average CRs for PWS were 3.5, 7.4, and 8.6 dB for healthy controls and retinal and glaucoma patients, respectively. For test loci with 25-34 dB at baseline, CRs for PWS were 8.2 (95% CI: 7.5-8.9) and 4.3 (95% CI: 4.0-4.6) dB for glaucoma and control subjects, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found differences in TRV of test loci depending on the baseline sensitivity value. Glaucoma patients had significantly worse TRV for loci that had sensitivity values within the normal range at baseline. The estimated CR has implications for sample size calculation in future glaucoma treatment trials using microperimetry as a clinical endpoint.

摘要

目的

确定CenterVue黄斑完整性评估(MAIA)微视野计在有威胁固视的视野缺损的青光眼患者中的检查间隔期重测变异性(TRV)。

方法

这是一项前瞻性病例对照研究,纳入27名参与者,其中包括13例稳定的原发性开角型青光眼患者以及14名对照者,后者包括5名健康个体和9名视网膜疾病患者(5例非新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者和4例遗传性视网膜疾病患者)。每位参与者的一只眼睛每隔1个月接受三次微视野检查。每次检查均采用相同的10-2笛卡尔网格和4-2阶梯算法的检查策略。我们通过计算青光眼患者、视网膜疾病患者和正常受试者的平均敏感度(MS)和逐点敏感度(PWS)的重复性系数(CR)来研究TRV。计算CR的95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

MS无显著变化,三次研究访视期间微视野检查的中位时长分别为9分26秒、8分52秒和8分46秒。健康对照者、视网膜疾病患者和青光眼患者MS的检查间隔期CR分别为1.1、2.5和1.8 dB,PWS的平均CR分别为3.5、7.4和8.6 dB。对于基线敏感度为25-34 dB的检查位点,青光眼患者和对照者PWS的CR分别为8.2(95% CI:7.5-8.9)和4.3(95% CI:4.0-4.6)dB。

结论

我们发现检查位点的TRV因基线敏感度值而异。对于基线敏感度值在正常范围内的位点,青光眼患者的TRV明显更差。估计的CR对未来以微视野检查作为临床终点的青光眼治疗试验的样本量计算有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384d/5404802/89aeb529b1ca/opth-11-745Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Intersession test-retest variability of 10-2 MAIA microperimetry in fixation-threatening glaucoma.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr 20;11:745-752. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S131371. eCollection 2017.
2
Intersession Test-Retest Variability of Microperimetry in Type 2 Macular Telangiectasia.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2017 Dec 12;6(6):7. doi: 10.1167/tvst.6.6.7. eCollection 2017 Dec.
3
Inter-device comparison of retinal sensitivity measurements: the CenterVue MAIA and the Nidek MP-1.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan-Feb;44(1):15-23. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12629.
4
Test-retest variability of microperimetry in geographic atrophy.
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2020 Apr 30;6:16. doi: 10.1186/s40942-020-00217-0. eCollection 2020.
5
Intersession test-retest variability of conventional and novel parameters using the MP-1 microperimeter.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec 23;10:29-42. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S92018. eCollection 2016.
6
Test-retest variability of microperimetry using the Nidek MP1 in patients with macular disease.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jul;50(7):3464-72. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2926. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
7
Microperimetry as an Outcome Measure in Choroideremia Trials: Reproducibility and Beyond.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Aug 1;57(10):4151-61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19338.
8
Test-Retest Repeatability of Microperimetry at the Border of Deep Scotomas.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Apr;56(4):2606-11. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15977.
9
Interpreting MAIA Microperimetry Using Age- and Retinal Loci-Specific Reference Thresholds.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Jun 18;9(7):19. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.7.19. eCollection 2020 Jun.
10
Test-Retest Reproducibility of the Microperimeter MP3 With Fundus Image Tracking in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Macular Disease.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Feb 7;7(1):17. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.1.17. eCollection 2018 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual Field Tests: A Narrative Review of Different Perimetric Methods.
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 23;13(9):2458. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092458.
2
In-Depth Retinal Sensitivity Assessment With the MP3 Type S Microperimeter: A Methods Study.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Apr 2;13(4):14. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.4.14.
5
Understanding the role of microperimetry in glaucoma.
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul;42(7):2289-2301. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-02203-3. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
6
Macular Rod Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa Measured With Scotopic Microperimetry.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Sep 1;10(11):3. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.11.3.
7
Edge of Scotoma Sensitivity as a Microperimetry Clinical Trial End Point in Retinopathy.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Sep 9;9(10):9. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.10.9. eCollection 2020 Sep.
8
Interpreting MAIA Microperimetry Using Age- and Retinal Loci-Specific Reference Thresholds.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Jun 18;9(7):19. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.7.19. eCollection 2020 Jun.
9
Microperimetry and optical coherence tomography imaging in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral focal ischaemic glaucoma.
Eye (Lond). 2018 Aug;32(8):1372-1379. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0094-3. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Test-Retest Variability of Fundus-Tracked Perimetry at the Peripapillary Region in Open Angle Glaucoma.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jul 1;57(8):3619-25. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-19002.
2
Fascicular Visual Field Defects in Open-Angle Glaucoma: Evaluation with Microperimetry.
J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:8274954. doi: 10.1155/2016/8274954. Epub 2016 Jun 5.
3
Intersession test-retest variability of conventional and novel parameters using the MP-1 microperimeter.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec 23;10:29-42. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S92018. eCollection 2016.
4
Prevalence of comorbid retinal disease in patients with glaucoma at an academic medical center.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul 13;9:1275-84. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S85851. eCollection 2015.
5
Macular retinal sensitivity using MP-1 in healthy Malaysian subjects of different ages.
J Optom. 2015 Oct-Dec;8(4):266-72. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 27.
7
Test-Retest Repeatability of Microperimetry at the Border of Deep Scotomas.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Apr;56(4):2606-11. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15977.
8
Test-Retest Intervisit Variability of Functional and Structural Parameters in X-Linked Retinoschisis.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2014 Oct 3;3(5):5. doi: 10.1167/tvst.3.5.5. eCollection 2014 Sep.
9
Intrasession test-retest variability of microperimetry in age-related macular degeneration.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Nov 11;54(12):7378-85. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12617.
10
Efficacy of SLO-Microperimetry and Humphrey for evaluating macular sensitivity changes in advanced glaucoma.
Can J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;48(5):406-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.08.001.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验