• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨专业医疗团队的困境:一项运用论坛戏剧的表演性研究

The Mangle of Interprofessional Health Care Teams: A Performative Study Using Forum Theater.

作者信息

Sommerfeldt Susan C

机构信息

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2015 Feb 4;2:2333393614565186. doi: 10.1177/2333393614565186. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2333393614565186
PMID:28462298
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5342284/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore dimensions of relational work in interprofessional health care teams. Practitioners from a variety of disciplines came together to examine teamwork and cocreate knowledge about interprofessionalism using forum theater. Interviews held prior to the workshop to explore teamwork were foundational to structuring the workshop. The forum theater processes offered participants the opportunity to enact and challenge behaviors and attitudes they experienced in health care teams. Throughout the workshop, aspects of professional identity, power, trust, communication, system structures, and motivation were explored. The activities of the workshop were analyzed using Pickering's theory, identifying three mangle strands found in being a team: organizational influences, accomplishing tasks, and an orientation to care. Performativity was identified as having a bearing on how teams perform and how teamwork is enacted. Practice components were seen as strands within a mangling of human and nonhuman forces that shape team performativity.

摘要

本研究的目的是探索跨专业医疗团队中关系工作的维度。来自不同学科的从业者齐聚一堂,通过论坛戏剧来审视团队合作并共同创造关于跨专业协作的知识。在研讨会之前进行的探索团队合作的访谈是构建研讨会的基础。论坛戏剧过程为参与者提供了机会,去演绎并挑战他们在医疗团队中所经历的行为和态度。在整个研讨会上,对专业身份、权力、信任、沟通、系统结构和动机等方面进行了探索。使用皮克林的理论对研讨会的活动进行了分析,确定了作为一个团队所存在的三条交织线索:组织影响、完成任务和关爱导向。能动性被认为与团队的表现方式以及团队合作的实施方式有关。实践要素被视为塑造团队能动性的人力和非人力因素交织中的线索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/5342284/5fff2efc8000/10.1177_2333393614565186-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/5342284/3e5566cda199/10.1177_2333393614565186-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/5342284/a83ad9be5fae/10.1177_2333393614565186-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/5342284/a82c05ca4dc8/10.1177_2333393614565186-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/5342284/c81d5484491b/10.1177_2333393614565186-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/5342284/5fff2efc8000/10.1177_2333393614565186-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/5342284/3e5566cda199/10.1177_2333393614565186-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/5342284/a83ad9be5fae/10.1177_2333393614565186-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/5342284/a82c05ca4dc8/10.1177_2333393614565186-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/5342284/c81d5484491b/10.1177_2333393614565186-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f982/5342284/5fff2efc8000/10.1177_2333393614565186-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
The Mangle of Interprofessional Health Care Teams: A Performative Study Using Forum Theater.跨专业医疗团队的困境:一项运用论坛戏剧的表演性研究
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2015 Feb 4;2:2333393614565186. doi: 10.1177/2333393614565186. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Client-centred practices and work in inpatient rehabilitation teams: results from four case studies.以患者为中心的实践与住院康复团队的工作:四项案例研究的结果
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(13):1135-43. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.955138. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
4
Introducing the nurse practitioner into the surgical ward: an ethnographic study of interprofessional teamwork practice.将执业护士引入外科病房:一项关于跨专业团队合作实践的人种志研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Jun;32(2):765-771. doi: 10.1111/scs.12507. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
5
Perceptions of interprofessional teamwork in low-acuity settings: a qualitative analysis.低危环境下的跨专业团队合作认知:定性分析。
Med Educ. 2014 Jun;48(6):583-92. doi: 10.1111/medu.12424.
6
What professionals say and do: the tension between egalitarianism and hierarchy in interprofessional teamwork.专业人士的言行:跨专业团队合作中平等主义与等级制度之间的紧张关系。
J Interprof Care. 2024 Mar-Apr;38(2):200-208. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2023.2289512. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
7
Family physicians' perspectives on interprofessional teamwork: Findings from a qualitative study.家庭医生对跨专业团队合作的看法:一项定性研究的结果
J Interprof Care. 2018 Mar;32(2):169-177. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1395828. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
8
Interprofessional teamwork in comprehensive primary healthcare services: Findings from a mixed methods study.综合基层医疗服务中的跨专业团队合作:一项混合方法研究的结果
J Interprof Care. 2018 May;32(3):274-283. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1401986. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
9
Team interactions in specialized palliative care teams: a qualitative study.专科姑息治疗团队中的团队互动:一项定性研究。
J Palliat Med. 2013 Sep;16(9):1062-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0622.
10
Who is on the primary care team? Professionals' perceptions of the conceptualization of teams and the underlying factors: a mixed-methods study.初级保健团队中有哪些成员?专业人员对团队概念化及潜在因素的看法:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Dec 28;18(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0685-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Performativity, identity formation and professionalism: Ethnographic research to explore student experiences of clinical simulation training.表现性、身份形成和专业性:探索学生临床模拟训练体验的民族志研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 30;15(7):e0236085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236085. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Sociomateriality in medical practice and learning: attuning to what matters.医学实践与学习中的社会物质性:关注重要之事。
Med Educ. 2014 Jan;48(1):44-52. doi: 10.1111/medu.12295.
2
Role construction and boundaries in interprofessional primary health care teams: a qualitative study.多专业初级卫生保健团队中的角色构建和界限:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Nov 24;13:486. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-486.
3
An integrative review of the factors influencing new graduate nurse engagement in interprofessional collaboration.影响新毕业护士参与跨专业协作的因素的综合综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Jan;70(1):4-20. doi: 10.1111/jan.12195. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
4
Interprofessional collaboration-in-practice: the contested place of ethics.实践中的跨专业协作:伦理的争议之地
Nurs Ethics. 2013 May;20(3):325-35. doi: 10.1177/0969733012462048. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
5
Interprofessional education: an overview of key developments in the past three decades.跨专业教育:过去三十年关键发展概述
Work. 2012;41(3):233-45. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1298.
6
Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: reforming health care by transforming health professionals' education.跨专业协作实践的核心能力:通过转变卫生专业人员教育来改革医疗保健
Acad Med. 2011 Nov;86(11):1351. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182308e39.
7
Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world.面向新世纪的卫生专业人员:变革教育,以加强相互依存世界中的卫生系统。
Lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1923-58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
8
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ):访谈和焦点小组的32项清单
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.