Fenwick Tara
School of Education, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Med Educ. 2014 Jan;48(1):44-52. doi: 10.1111/medu.12295.
In current debates about professional practice and education, increasing emphasis is placed on understanding learning as a process of ongoing participation rather than one of acquiring knowledge and skills. However, although this socio-cultural view is important and useful, issues have emerged in studies of practice-based learning that point to certain oversights.
Three issues are described here: (i) the limited attention paid to the importance of materiality - objects, technologies, nature, etc.-- in questions of learning; (ii) the human-centric view of practice that fails to note the relations among social and material forces, and (iii) the conflicts between ideals of evidence-based standardised models and the sociomaterial contingencies of clinical practice.
It is argued here that a socio-material approach to practice and learning offers important insights for medical education. This view is in line with a growing field of research in the materiality of everyday life, which embraces wide-ranging families of theory that can be only briefly mentioned in this short paper. The main premise they share is that social and material forces, culture, nature and technology, are enmeshed in everyday practice. Objects and humans act upon one another in ways that mutually transform their characteristics and activity. Examples from research in medical practice show how materials actively influence clinical practice, how learning itself is a material matter, how protocols are in fact temporary sociomaterial achievements, and how practices form unique and sometimes conflicting sociomaterial worlds, with diverse diagnostic and treatment approaches for the same thing.
This discussion concludes with implications for learning in practice. What is required is a shift from an emphasis on acquiring knowledge to participating more wisely in particular situations. This focus is on learning how to attune to minor material fluctuations and surprises, how to track one's own and others' effects on 'intra-actions' and emerging effects, and how to improvise solutions.
在当前关于专业实践和教育的辩论中,越来越强调将学习理解为一个持续参与的过程,而不是获取知识和技能的过程。然而,尽管这种社会文化观点很重要且有用,但基于实践的学习研究中出现的问题表明存在某些疏忽。
这里描述了三个问题:(i)在学习问题上对物质性(物体、技术、自然等)的重要性关注有限;(ii)以人类为中心的实践观点没有注意到社会和物质力量之间的关系;(iii)循证标准化模型的理想与临床实践的社会物质偶然性之间的冲突。
这里认为,一种社会物质性的实践和学习方法为医学教育提供了重要的见解。这种观点与日常生活物质性研究的一个不断发展的领域相一致,该领域包含了广泛的理论家族,在这篇短文中只能简要提及。它们共有的主要前提是,社会和物质力量、文化、自然和技术都融入了日常实践中。物体和人类以相互改变其特征和活动的方式相互作用。医学实践研究的例子表明,物质如何积极影响临床实践,学习本身如何是一个物质问题,协议实际上如何是临时的社会物质成就,以及实践如何形成独特且有时相互冲突的社会物质世界,对同一事物有不同的诊断和治疗方法。
本次讨论得出了对实践学习的启示。需要从强调获取知识转向更明智地参与特定情境。重点是学习如何适应微小的物质波动和意外,如何追踪自己和他人对“内互动”和新出现效果的影响,以及如何即兴解决问题。