Kennedy John A, Brodov Yafim, Weinstein Adam L, Israel Ora, Frenkel Alex
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, P.O.B. 9602, 31096, Haifa, Israel.
Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Feb;26(1):236-245. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-0905-0. Epub 2017 May 1.
Data regarding cardiac cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT)-specific augmented databases and their impact on CT-based attenuation correction (AC) perfusion scores in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) were obtained on a multiple-pinhole CZT SPECT/CT.
Summed stress (SSS) and rest scores (SRS) were measured using automated software in three independent patient groups: group 1 (n = 80) underwent MPI on both CZT and conventional sodium iodide (NaI) devices, group 2 (n = 80) with low coronary artery disease likelihood and normal MPI provided reference CZT databases; and group 3 (n = 152) served to compare AC and non-AC (NAC) scores on CZT. Group 1 CZT and NaI scores gave a significant 1:1 linear correlation for CZT scores referenced to the custom database vs NaI scores referenced to the default database, but these were not concordant when CZT scores were referenced to the default database. AC significantly decreased average SSS and SRS in men vs NAC, 4.29 ± 6.30 vs 5.37 ± 7.26 (P < 0.001) and 2.37 ± 4.72 vs 3.13 ± 5.85 (P < 0.001), but not in women, 2.28 ± 3.42 vs 2.28 ± 3.08 (p NS) and 0.46 ± 1.51 vs 0.61 ± 1.86, (p NS), respectively.
Specifically designed databases for solid-state CZT cardiac SPECT provide accurate quantitation of perfusion scores concordant with those previously validated for conventional SPECT. AC and NAC CZT scores differed significantly, especially in men.
在多针孔碲化镉锌(CZT)单光子发射计算机断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(SPECT/CT)上获取了关于心脏CZT特定增强数据库及其对心肌灌注成像(MPI)中基于CT的衰减校正(AC)灌注评分影响的数据。
使用自动化软件在三个独立患者组中测量了总应力(SSS)和静息评分(SRS):第1组(n = 80)在CZT和传统碘化钠(NaI)设备上均接受了MPI,第2组(n = 80)冠状动脉疾病可能性低且MPI正常,提供了参考CZT数据库;第3组(n = 152)用于比较CZT上的AC和非AC(NAC)评分。第1组CZT和NaI评分显示,与参考默认数据库的NaI评分相比,参考自定义数据库的CZT评分具有显著的1:1线性相关性,但当CZT评分参考默认数据库时,两者不一致。与NAC相比,AC显著降低了男性的平均SSS和SRS,分别为4.29±6.30对5.37±7.26(P < 0.001)和2.37±4.72对3.13±5.85(P < 0.001),但女性中无显著差异,分别为2.28±3.42对2.28±3.08(p无统计学意义)和0.46±1.51对0.61±1.86(p无统计学意义)。
专门为固态CZT心脏SPECT设计的数据库可提供与先前传统SPECT验证结果一致的灌注评分准确量化。AC和NAC的CZT评分差异显著,尤其是在男性中。