• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗临床高危前列腺癌患者的功能结局:多机构分析。

Functional outcomes of clinically high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

机构信息

VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.

Department of Urology, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Dec;20(4):395-400. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2017.26. Epub 2017 May 2.

DOI:10.1038/pcan.2017.26
PMID:28462944
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To ascertain 3-year urinary continence (UC) and sexual function (SF) recovery following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for clinically high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

Retrospective analyses of a prospectively maintained database for 769 patients with D'Amico high-risk PCa undergoing RARP at two tertiary care centers in the United States and Europe between 2001 and 2014. The association between time since RARP and recovery of UC (defined as 0 pad/one safety liner per day) and SF (defined as sexual health inventory for men (SHIM) score ⩾17) was tested in separate preoperative and post-operative Cox-proportional hazards regression models. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using continence 0 pad per day and erection sufficient for intercourse as end points for UC and SF recovery, respectively.

RESULTS

Mean age of the cohort was 62.3 years, and 62.1% harbored ⩾PT3a disease. Nerve sparing (unilateral or bilateral) RARP was performed in 87.7% of patients. Kaplan-Meier estimates of UC recovery at 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery was 85.2%, 89.1% and 91.2%, respectively, while 33.8, 52.3 and 69.0% of preoperatively potent men (preoperative SHIM ⩾17; n=548; 71.3%) recovered SF. Similar results were noted in sensitivity analyses. Patient age and year of surgery were associated with UC and SF recovery; additionally, preoperative SHIM score, degree of nerve sparing, pT3b-T4 disease and surgical margins were associated with SF recovery over the period of observation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with D'Amico high-risk PCa treated with RARP may continue to recover UC and SF beyond 12 months of surgery and show promising outcomes at 3-year follow-up. Appropriate patient selection and counseling may aid in setting realistic expectations for functional recovery post RARP.

摘要

背景

确定机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)治疗临床高危前列腺癌(PCa)后 3 年的尿控(UC)和性功能(SF)恢复情况。

方法

对 2001 年至 2014 年期间在美国和欧洲的两个三级保健中心接受 RARP 的 769 例 D'Amico 高危 PCa 患者的前瞻性维护数据库进行回顾性分析。在单独的术前和术后 Cox 比例风险回归模型中,检验了 RARP 后时间与 UC(定义为每天 0 个护垫/一个安全衬垫)和 SF(定义为男性健康问卷(SHIM)评分 ⩾17)恢复之间的关系。使用 UC 和 SF 恢复的每天 0 个护垫和足以进行性交的勃起作为终点进行了敏感性分析。

结果

队列的平均年龄为 62.3 岁,62.1%的患者存在 ⩾PT3a 疾病。87.7%的患者接受了神经保留(单侧或双侧)RARP。手术后 12、24 和 36 个月的 UC 恢复的 Kaplan-Meier 估计值分别为 85.2%、89.1%和 91.2%,而术前(SHIM ⩾17;n=548;71.3%)有性功能的患者中有 33.8%、52.3%和 69.0%恢复了 SF。在敏感性分析中也观察到了类似的结果。患者年龄和手术年份与 UC 和 SF 恢复有关;此外,术前 SHIM 评分、神经保留程度、pT3b-T4 疾病和手术切缘与观察期内的 SF 恢复有关。

结论

接受 RARP 治疗的 D'Amico 高危 PCa 患者可能会在手术后 12 个月后继续恢复 UC 和 SF,并在 3 年随访时显示出有前途的结果。适当的患者选择和咨询可能有助于为 RARP 后功能恢复设定现实的期望。

相似文献

1
Functional outcomes of clinically high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗临床高危前列腺癌患者的功能结局:多机构分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Dec;20(4):395-400. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2017.26. Epub 2017 May 2.
2
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.一项实用随机对照试验研究了保留耻骨前列腺韧带在机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术后早期尿控恢复中的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 May 6.
3
Optimal strategy for penile rehabilitation after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on preoperative erectile function.基于术前勃起功能的机器人辅助前列腺根治术后阴茎康复的最佳策略。
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):658-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11487.x. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
4
Long-term evaluation of survival, continence and potency (SCP) outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后生存、控尿和性功能(SCP)结局的长期评估。
BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(3):338-45. doi: 10.1111/bju.12001. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
5
How to optimize patient selection for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional outcome analyses from a tertiary referral center.如何优化机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的患者选择:来自三级转诊中心的功能预后分析。
J Endourol. 2014 Jul;28(7):792-800. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0007. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
6
Early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in older Australian men.老年澳大利亚男性机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后早期尿控恢复。
BJU Int. 2014 Nov;114 Suppl 1:29-33. doi: 10.1111/bju.12800. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
7
Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.根治性前列腺切除术术后功能结局的决定因素:机器人辅助与经耻骨后。
Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 May 17.
8
Significance of erection hardness score as a diagnostic tool to assess erectile function recovery in Japanese men after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.勃起硬度评分作为评估日本男性机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能恢复的诊断工具的意义。
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):221-6. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0571-2. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
9
Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.与经耻骨后开放前列腺切除术相比,双侧神经保留机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与更快的控尿恢复相关,但与勃起功能恢复无关:需要准确选择患者。
Oncol Rep. 2013 Jun;29(6):2445-50. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2365. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
10
Assessing the Impact of Surgeon Experience on Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results of Four High-Volume Surgeons.评估外科医生经验对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁恢复的影响:四位高手术量外科医生的研究结果。
J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):872-877. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0085. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Proficiency score as a predictor of early trifecta achievement during the learning curve of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: Results of a multicentric series.在高危前列腺癌机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术学习曲线期间,熟练程度评分作为早期三连胜成就预测指标:多中心系列研究结果
Curr Urol. 2024 Jun;18(2):110-114. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000213. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
2
Retzius-Sparing Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy: Technical Challenges for Surgeons and Key Prospective Refinements.保留精囊的机器人辅助前列腺切除术:外科医生面临的技术挑战及关键的前瞻性改进措施
Res Rep Urol. 2023 Dec 12;15:541-552. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S372803. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放式经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照 3 期研究的早期结果。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1057-1066. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30592-X. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
2
Erectile Function Recovery after Radical Prostatectomy in Men with High Risk Features.高危特征男性根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能的恢复。
J Urol. 2016 Aug;196(2):507-13. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.080. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
3
Comparison of Perioperative and Early Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in a Contemporary Population Based Cohort.
Intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with perineal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single center analysis.
会阴机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌患者的中期肿瘤学和功能结果:单中心分析
Asian J Urol. 2023 Oct;10(4):423-430. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
4
Erectile function, urinary continence and oncologic outcomes of neurovascular bundle sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.保留神经血管束的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗高危前列腺癌的勃起功能、尿控及肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 5;13:1161544. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1161544. eCollection 2023.
5
The impact of radical prostatectomy on global climate: a prospective multicentre study comparing laparoscopic versus robotic surgery.根治性前列腺切除术对全球气候的影响:一项比较腹腔镜与机器人手术的前瞻性多中心研究。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Jun;27(2):272-278. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00672-4. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
6
Diabetes mellitus lowers the chance of short-term urinary continence recovery in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.糖尿病会降低接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者短期尿失禁恢复的几率。
Cent European J Urol. 2022;75(2):162-168. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2022.0279.R1. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
7
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Results from a Large Single-institution Series.保留雷济厄斯间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗高危前列腺癌患者:来自大型单机构系列研究的结果
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Mar 4;38:69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.02.007. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Two-year quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy according to pentafecta criteria and cancer of the prostate risk assessment (CAPRA-S).根据 pentafecta 标准和前列腺癌风险评估 (CAPRA-S),机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术两年后的生活质量。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04289-2.
9
Contemporary outcomes following robotic prostatectomy for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer.机器人辅助前列腺切除术治疗局部晚期和转移性前列腺癌的当代疗效
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2178-2187. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1002.
10
The role of cystoprostatectomy in management of locally advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review.根治性膀胱前列腺切除术在局部进展性前列腺癌治疗中的作用:系统评价。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan 20;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-1791-5.
在当代基于人群的队列中比较开放和机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的围手术期和早期肿瘤学结果。
J Urol. 2016 Jul;196(1):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.105. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
4
Unexpected Long-term Improvements in Urinary and Erectile Function in a Large Cohort of Men with Self-reported Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy.在一大群接受根治性前列腺切除术后自我报告结果的男性中,尿功能和勃起功能出现意外的长期改善。
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):899-905. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.074. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
5
Nerve-sparing Surgery Technique, Not the Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles, Leads to Improved Long-term Continence Rates After Radical Prostatectomy.保留神经手术技术,而非保留神经血管束,可提高前列腺癌根治术后的长期控尿率。
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):584-589. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.037. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
6
Long-term cancer control outcomes in patients with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a multi-institutional study of 1100 patients.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗临床高危前列腺癌患者的长期癌症控制结果:来自 1100 例患者的多机构研究结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
7
Cancer statistics, 2015.癌症统计数据,2015 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
8
Ten-year outcomes of sexual function after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective longitudinal study.根治性前列腺切除术后 10 年的性功能结果:一项前瞻性纵向研究的结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
9
Long-term continence outcomes in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的男性患者的长期控尿效果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):52-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
10
The trifecta outcome in 300 consecutive cases of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy according to D'Amico risk criteria.300 例连续机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术按 D'Amico 风险标准的三联结局。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jan;39(1):107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Oct 22.