Falchook Aaron D, Green Rebecca, Knowles Mary E, Amdur Robert J, Mendenhall William, Hayes David N, Grilley-Olson Juneko E, Weiss Jared, Reeve Bryce B, Mitchell Sandra A, Basch Ethan M, Chera Bhishamjit S
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida Hospitals, Gainesville3Shands Cancer Center, University of Florida Hospitals, Gainesville.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jun 1;142(6):517-23. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.0656.
Agreement between patient- and practitioner-reported toxic effects during chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer is unknown.
To compare patient-reported symptom severity and practitioner-reported toxic effects among patients receiving chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four patients participating in a phase 2 trial of deintensified chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma were included in the present study (conducted from February 8, 2012, to March 2, 2015). Most treatment (radiotherapy, 60 Gy, with concurrent weekly administration of cisplatin, 30 mg/m2) was administered at academic medical centers. Included patients had no prior head and neck cancers, were 18 years or older, and had a smoking history of 10 pack-years or less or more than 10 pack-years but 30 pack-years or less and abstinent for the past 5 years. Cancer status was untreated human papillomavirus or p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx or unknown head and neck primary site; and cancer staging was category T0 to T3, category N0 to N2c, M0, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1. Baseline, weekly, and posttreatment toxic effects were assessed by physicians or nurse practitioners using National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. Patient-reported symptom severity was measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize raw agreement between CTCAE grades and PRO-CTCAE severity ratings.
Baseline, weekly, and posttreatment toxic effects assessed using CTCAE, version 4.0, and PRO-CTCAE.
Raw agreement indices between patient-reported toxic effects, including symptom frequency, severity, and interference with daily activities (score range, 0 [none] to 4 [very severe]), and practitioner-measured toxic effects, including swallowing, oral pain, and hoarseness (score range, 1 [mild] to 5 [death]).
Of the 44 patients included in the analysis (39 men, 5 women; mean [SD] age, 61 [8.4] years), there were 327 analyzable pairs of CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE symptom surveys and no treatment delays due to toxic effects. Patient-reported and practitioner-reported symptom severity agreement was high at baseline when most symptoms were absent but declined throughout treatment as toxic effects increased. Most disagreement was due to lower severity of toxic effects reported by practitioners (eg, from 45% agreement at baseline to 27% at the final week of treatment for pain). This was particularly noted for domains that are not easily evaluated by physical examination, such as anxiety and fatigue (eg, severity of fatigue decreased from 43% at baseline to 12% in the final week of treatment).
Practitioner-reported toxic effects are lower than patient self-reports during head and neck chemoradiotherapy. The inclusion of patient-reported symptomatic toxic effects provides information that can potentially enhance clinical management and improve data quality in clinical trials.
头颈部癌放化疗期间患者报告与医生报告的毒性反应之间的一致性尚不清楚。
比较接受头颈部癌放化疗患者中患者报告的症状严重程度与医生报告的毒性反应。
设计、设置和参与者:本研究纳入了44名参与口咽癌减量化放化疗2期试验的患者(于2012年2月8日至2015年3月2日进行)。大多数治疗(放疗,60 Gy,同时每周给予顺铂,30 mg/m²)在学术医疗中心进行。纳入的患者既往无头颈癌,年龄在18岁及以上,吸烟史为10包年或以下,或超过10包年但在30包年及以下且在过去5年已戒烟。癌症状态为未经治疗的人乳头瘤病毒或口咽p16阳性鳞状细胞癌或头颈原发部位不明;癌症分期为T0至T3期、N0至N2c期、M0期,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为0至1级。医生或执业护士使用美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)第4.0版评估基线、每周及治疗后的毒性反应。使用CTCAE的患者报告结局版本(PRO-CTCAE)测量患者报告的症状严重程度。描述性统计用于描述CTCAE分级与PRO-CTCAE严重程度评分之间的原始一致性。
使用CTCAE第4.0版和PRO-CTCAE评估基线、每周及治疗后的毒性反应。
患者报告的毒性反应(包括症状频率、严重程度以及对日常活动的干扰,评分范围为0[无]至4[非常严重])与医生测量的毒性反应(包括吞咽困难、口腔疼痛和声音嘶哑,评分范围为1[轻度]至5[死亡])之间的原始一致性指标。
纳入分析的44名患者(39名男性,5名女性;平均[标准差]年龄为61[8.4]岁),有327对可分析的CTCAE和PRO-CTCAE症状调查,且无因毒性反应导致的治疗延迟。在基线时,当大多数症状不存在时,患者报告和医生报告的症状严重程度一致性较高,但随着治疗过程中毒性反应增加,一致性下降。大多数不一致是由于医生报告的毒性反应严重程度较低(例如,疼痛从基线时的45%一致性下降到治疗最后一周的27%)。这在体格检查不易评估的领域尤为明显,如焦虑和疲劳(例如,疲劳严重程度从基线时的43%下降到治疗最后一周的12%)。
头颈部放化疗期间,医生报告的毒性反应低于患者自我报告。纳入患者报告的症状性毒性反应可提供信息,可能增强临床试验中的临床管理并提高数据质量。