• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头颈部癌放化疗相关的患者报告与从业者报告的毒性效应比较。

Comparison of Patient- and Practitioner-Reported Toxic Effects Associated With Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer.

作者信息

Falchook Aaron D, Green Rebecca, Knowles Mary E, Amdur Robert J, Mendenhall William, Hayes David N, Grilley-Olson Juneko E, Weiss Jared, Reeve Bryce B, Mitchell Sandra A, Basch Ethan M, Chera Bhishamjit S

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida Hospitals, Gainesville3Shands Cancer Center, University of Florida Hospitals, Gainesville.

出版信息

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jun 1;142(6):517-23. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.0656.

DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2016.0656
PMID:27149571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5928525/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Agreement between patient- and practitioner-reported toxic effects during chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare patient-reported symptom severity and practitioner-reported toxic effects among patients receiving chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four patients participating in a phase 2 trial of deintensified chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma were included in the present study (conducted from February 8, 2012, to March 2, 2015). Most treatment (radiotherapy, 60 Gy, with concurrent weekly administration of cisplatin, 30 mg/m2) was administered at academic medical centers. Included patients had no prior head and neck cancers, were 18 years or older, and had a smoking history of 10 pack-years or less or more than 10 pack-years but 30 pack-years or less and abstinent for the past 5 years. Cancer status was untreated human papillomavirus or p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx or unknown head and neck primary site; and cancer staging was category T0 to T3, category N0 to N2c, M0, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1. Baseline, weekly, and posttreatment toxic effects were assessed by physicians or nurse practitioners using National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. Patient-reported symptom severity was measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize raw agreement between CTCAE grades and PRO-CTCAE severity ratings.

INTERVENTIONS

Baseline, weekly, and posttreatment toxic effects assessed using CTCAE, version 4.0, and PRO-CTCAE.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Raw agreement indices between patient-reported toxic effects, including symptom frequency, severity, and interference with daily activities (score range, 0 [none] to 4 [very severe]), and practitioner-measured toxic effects, including swallowing, oral pain, and hoarseness (score range, 1 [mild] to 5 [death]).

RESULTS

Of the 44 patients included in the analysis (39 men, 5 women; mean [SD] age, 61 [8.4] years), there were 327 analyzable pairs of CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE symptom surveys and no treatment delays due to toxic effects. Patient-reported and practitioner-reported symptom severity agreement was high at baseline when most symptoms were absent but declined throughout treatment as toxic effects increased. Most disagreement was due to lower severity of toxic effects reported by practitioners (eg, from 45% agreement at baseline to 27% at the final week of treatment for pain). This was particularly noted for domains that are not easily evaluated by physical examination, such as anxiety and fatigue (eg, severity of fatigue decreased from 43% at baseline to 12% in the final week of treatment).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Practitioner-reported toxic effects are lower than patient self-reports during head and neck chemoradiotherapy. The inclusion of patient-reported symptomatic toxic effects provides information that can potentially enhance clinical management and improve data quality in clinical trials.

摘要

重要性

头颈部癌放化疗期间患者报告与医生报告的毒性反应之间的一致性尚不清楚。

目的

比较接受头颈部癌放化疗患者中患者报告的症状严重程度与医生报告的毒性反应。

设计、设置和参与者:本研究纳入了44名参与口咽癌减量化放化疗2期试验的患者(于2012年2月8日至2015年3月2日进行)。大多数治疗(放疗,60 Gy,同时每周给予顺铂,30 mg/m²)在学术医疗中心进行。纳入的患者既往无头颈癌,年龄在18岁及以上,吸烟史为10包年或以下,或超过10包年但在30包年及以下且在过去5年已戒烟。癌症状态为未经治疗的人乳头瘤病毒或口咽p16阳性鳞状细胞癌或头颈原发部位不明;癌症分期为T0至T3期、N0至N2c期、M0期,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为0至1级。医生或执业护士使用美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)第4.0版评估基线、每周及治疗后的毒性反应。使用CTCAE的患者报告结局版本(PRO-CTCAE)测量患者报告的症状严重程度。描述性统计用于描述CTCAE分级与PRO-CTCAE严重程度评分之间的原始一致性。

干预措施

使用CTCAE第4.0版和PRO-CTCAE评估基线、每周及治疗后的毒性反应。

主要结局和指标

患者报告的毒性反应(包括症状频率、严重程度以及对日常活动的干扰,评分范围为0[无]至4[非常严重])与医生测量的毒性反应(包括吞咽困难、口腔疼痛和声音嘶哑,评分范围为1[轻度]至5[死亡])之间的原始一致性指标。

结果

纳入分析的44名患者(39名男性,5名女性;平均[标准差]年龄为61[8.4]岁),有327对可分析的CTCAE和PRO-CTCAE症状调查,且无因毒性反应导致的治疗延迟。在基线时,当大多数症状不存在时,患者报告和医生报告的症状严重程度一致性较高,但随着治疗过程中毒性反应增加,一致性下降。大多数不一致是由于医生报告的毒性反应严重程度较低(例如,疼痛从基线时的45%一致性下降到治疗最后一周的27%)。这在体格检查不易评估的领域尤为明显,如焦虑和疲劳(例如,疲劳严重程度从基线时的43%下降到治疗最后一周的12%)。

结论及意义

头颈部放化疗期间,医生报告的毒性反应低于患者自我报告。纳入患者报告的症状性毒性反应可提供信息,可能增强临床试验中的临床管理并提高数据质量。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Patient- and Practitioner-Reported Toxic Effects Associated With Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部癌放化疗相关的患者报告与从业者报告的毒性效应比较。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jun 1;142(6):517-23. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.0656.
2
Mature results of a prospective study of deintensified chemoradiotherapy for low-risk human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.低危型人乳头瘤病毒相关口咽鳞状细胞癌去强化放化疗的前瞻性研究的成熟结果。
Cancer. 2018 Jun 1;124(11):2347-2354. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31338. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
3
Phase 2 Trial of De-intensified Chemoradiation Therapy for Favorable-Risk Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.人乳头瘤病毒相关口咽鳞癌低强度放化疗的 2 期临床试验。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Dec 1;93(5):976-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.08.033. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
4
Dosimetric Predictors of Patient-Reported Xerostomia and Dysphagia With Deintensified Chemoradiation Therapy for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.人乳头瘤病毒相关口咽鳞状细胞癌减量化放化疗患者报告的口干症和吞咽困难的剂量学预测因素
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Aug 1;98(5):1022-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.034. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
5
Phase II Trial of De-Intensified Chemoradiotherapy for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.人乳头瘤病毒相关口咽鳞状细胞癌去强化放化疗的 II 期临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct 10;37(29):2661-2669. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01007. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
6
Modern Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Oropharynx Cancer and Severe Late Toxic Effects: Implications for Clinical Trial Design.现代影像引导调强放疗治疗口咽癌及严重迟发性毒性反应:对临床试验设计的影响。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec 1;142(12):1164-1170. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.1876.
7
Comparing the patients' subjective experiences of acute side effects during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer with four different patient-reported outcomes questionnaires.比较四种不同患者报告结局问卷评估头颈部癌症放射治疗急性不良反应时患者的主观体验。
Acta Oncol. 2019 May;58(5):603-609. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1563713. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
8
Evaluation of different recall periods for the US National Cancer Institute's PRO-CTCAE.对美国国立癌症研究所的PRO-CTCAE不同召回期的评估。
Clin Trials. 2017 Jun;14(3):255-263. doi: 10.1177/1740774517698645. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
9
Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (NRG Oncology RTOG 1016): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.放疗联合西妥昔单抗或顺铂治疗人乳头瘤病毒阳性口咽癌(NRG 肿瘤学 RTOG 1016):一项随机、多中心、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):40-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32779-X. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
10
Feasibility of Patient Reporting of Symptomatic Adverse Events via the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) in a Chemoradiotherapy Cooperative Group Multicenter Clinical Trial.在一项放化疗协作组多中心临床试验中,通过患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)让患者报告症状性不良事件的可行性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):409-418. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Isotonic Phase I cancer clinical trial design utilizing patient-reported outcomes.利用患者报告结局的等渗I期癌症临床试验设计
Stat Biopharm Res. 2025;17(1):36-45. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2023.2288013. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
2
A Cross-Sectional Survey of Oral Adverse Events and Oral Management Needs in Outpatients Receiving Cancer Drug Therapy.接受癌症药物治疗的门诊患者口腔不良事件及口腔管理需求的横断面调查
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;17(4):641. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040641.
3
Decoding clinical trial jargon: helping people understand how safety and quality of life are assessed in cancer trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Importance of Radiation Oncologist Experience Among Patients With Head-and-Neck Cancer Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.放射肿瘤学家经验在接受调强放射治疗的头颈癌患者中的重要性。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar 1;34(7):684-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.9898. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
2
Phase 2 Trial of De-intensified Chemoradiation Therapy for Favorable-Risk Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.人乳头瘤病毒相关口咽鳞癌低强度放化疗的 2 期临床试验。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Dec 1;93(5):976-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.08.033. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
3
Integrating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Routine Cancer Care: Cancer Patients' and Clinicians' Perceptions of Acceptability and Value.
解读临床试验术语:帮助人们了解癌症试验中如何评估安全性和生活质量。
Future Oncol. 2025 Jan;21(1):5-10. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2422808. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
4
Experiences of Patients With Cancer Using Electronic Symptom Management Systems: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.癌症患者使用电子症状管理系统的体验:定性系统评价和元综合。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 28;26:e59061. doi: 10.2196/59061.
5
The association of diabetes mellitus and routinely collected patient-reported outcomes in patients with cancer. A real-world cohort study.糖尿病与癌症患者常规采集的患者报告结局之间的关联。一项真实世界的队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(20):e70246. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70246.
6
Definitive radio(chemo)therapy versus upfront surgery in the treatment of HPV-related localized or locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.HPV 相关局灶性或局部晚期口咽鳞状细胞癌的确定性放化疗与 upfront 手术治疗比较。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 25;19(7):e0307658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307658. eCollection 2024.
7
Unravelling Quality of Life for Head and Neck Cancer Patients after VMAT Radiation Therapy: Insights from Toxicity, Dosimetry and Symptoms Correlation.揭开头颈部癌症患者容积调强弧形放疗后的生活质量:毒性、剂量测定与症状相关性的见解
Clin Pract. 2024 Jun 6;14(3):1085-1099. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14030086.
8
Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes on genotype-guided irinotecan dosing: feasibility and clinical relevance.基于基因型的伊立替康剂量指导下的纵向患者报告结局:可行性和临床相关性。
Oncologist. 2024 Sep 6;29(9):780-785. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae121.
9
Temporal characterization of acute pain and toxicity kinetics during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. A retrospective study.头颈部癌放射治疗期间急性疼痛的时间特征及毒性动力学。一项回顾性研究。
Oral Oncol Rep. 2023 Sep;7. doi: 10.1016/j.oor.2023.100092. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
10
Radiation Dose Sensitivity of Subregions of the Larynx to Patient-Reported Swallowing Outcomes.喉部分区域对患者报告的吞咽结果的辐射剂量敏感性
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Feb 6;9(5):101458. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101458. eCollection 2024 May.
将患者报告的结局指标纳入癌症常规护理:癌症患者和临床医生对可接受性和价值的看法。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015 Oct 29;3(1):1169. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1169. eCollection 2015.
4
Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).美国国家癌症研究所患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)的有效性和可靠性。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1051-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2639.
5
It is not just IMRT: Human papillomavirus related oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma is associated with better swallowing outcomes after definitive chemoradiotherapy.不仅仅是调强放射治疗:人乳头瘤病毒相关的口咽鳞状细胞癌在根治性放化疗后吞咽结局更好。
Oral Oncol. 2015 Aug;51(8):800-4. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 May 11.
6
Improving outcomes in cancer patients on oral anti-cancer medications using a novel mobile phone-based intervention: study design of a randomized controlled trial.使用基于手机的新型干预措施改善口服抗癌药物癌症患者的治疗效果:一项随机对照试验的研究设计
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Dec 23;3(4):e79. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4041.
7
Institutional clinical trial accrual volume and survival of patients with head and neck cancer.机构临床试验入组数量与头颈部癌症患者的生存情况。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 10;33(2):156-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.5218. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
8
Unanticipated hospital admissions during or soon after radiation therapy: Incidence and predictive factors.放射治疗期间或放疗后不久意外住院:发生率及预测因素。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 May-Jun;5(3):e245-e253. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
9
Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE).国家癌症研究所患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)的制定。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 29;106(9). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju244. Print 2014 Sep.
10
Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials.推荐在成人癌症治疗试验中测量的患者报告的核心症状集。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jul 8;106(7). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju129. Print 2014 Jul.