Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 22nd Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):3069-3079. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03746-5. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
Regulatory guidance suggests capturing patient-reported overall side effect impact in cancer trials. We examined whether the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) GP5 item ("I am bothered by side effects of treatment") post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy differed between oxaliplatin vs. non- oxaliplatin arms in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) R-04 trial of stage II-III rectal cancer patients.
The R-04 neoadjuvant trial compared local-regional tumor control between patients randomized to receive 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine with radiation, with or without oxaliplatin (4 treatment arms). Participants completed surveys at baseline and immediately after chemoradiotherapy. GP5 has a 5-point response scale: "Not at all" (0), "A little bit" (1), "Somewhat" (2), "Quite a bit" (3), and "Very much" (4). Logistic regression compared the odds of reporting moderate-high side effect impact (GP5 2-4) between patients receiving oxaliplatin or not after chemoradiotherapy, controlling for relevant patient characteristics. We examined associations between GP5 and other patient-reported outcomes reflecting side effects.
Analyses were performed among 1132 study participants. Participants receiving oxaliplatin were 1.58 times (95% CI: 1.22-2.05) more likely to report moderate-high side effect bother at post-chemotherapy/radiation. In both arms, worse overall side effect impact was associated with patient-reported diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and peripheral sensory neuropathy (p < 0.01 for all).
This secondary analysis of R-04 found that GP5 distinguished between patients receiving oxaliplatin or not as part of their post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, adding patient-centric evidence on the reduced tolerability of oxaliplatin and demonstrating that GP5 is sensitive to known toxicity differences between treatments.
GOV: NCT00058474.
监管指南建议在癌症试验中捕捉患者报告的总体副作用影响。我们研究了接受新辅助化疗/放疗后,接受奥沙利铂与非奥沙利铂治疗的Ⅱ-Ⅲ期直肠癌患者在 National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) R-04 试验中,功能性评估癌症治疗量表(FACT)GP5 项目(“我被治疗的副作用困扰”)是否存在差异。
R-04 新辅助试验比较了接受氟尿嘧啶或卡培他滨联合放疗并加用或不加用奥沙利铂的患者(4 个治疗组)的局部区域肿瘤控制情况。参与者在基线和放化疗后立即完成了问卷调查。GP5 有 5 分制应答量表:“一点也不”(0)、“有一点”(1)、“有一些”(2)、“相当一些”(3)和“非常多”(4)。逻辑回归比较了放化疗后报告中高度副作用影响(GP5 2-4)的患者接受奥沙利铂或不接受奥沙利铂的可能性,同时控制了相关患者特征。我们还检查了 GP5 与反映副作用的其他患者报告结局之间的关系。
对 1132 名研究参与者进行了分析。接受奥沙利铂治疗的患者报告化疗/放疗后中高度副作用困扰的可能性是不接受奥沙利铂治疗的患者的 1.58 倍(95%CI:1.22-2.05)。在两个治疗组中,更差的总体副作用影响与患者报告的腹泻、恶心、呕吐和周围感觉神经病变相关(所有 p 值均 < 0.01)。
R-04 的二次分析发现,GP5 能够区分接受奥沙利铂或不接受奥沙利铂作为其新辅助化疗/放疗一部分的患者,为奥沙利铂耐受性降低提供了以患者为中心的证据,并证明了 GP5 对治疗之间已知毒性差异的敏感性。
政府:NCT00058474。