Matthew Fields J, Davis Joshua, Alsup Carl, Bates Amanda, Au Arthur, Adhikari Srikar, Farrell Isaac
Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;24(9):1124-1136. doi: 10.1111/acem.13212. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
The use of ultrasonography (US) to diagnose appendicitis is well established. More recently, point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) has also been studied for the diagnosis of appendicitis, which may also prove a valuable diagnostic tool. The purpose of this study was through systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the test characteristics of POCUS, specifically US performed by a nonradiologist physician, in accurately diagnosing acute appendicitis in patients of any age.
We conducted a thorough and systematic literature search of English language articles published on point-of-care, physician-performed transabdominal US used for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis from 1980 to May, 2015 using OVID MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-indexed Citations and Scopus. Studies were selected and subsequently independently abstracted by two trained reviewers. A random-effects pooled analysis was used to construct a hierarchical summary receiver operator characteristic curve, and a meta-regression was performed. Quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.
Our search yielded 5,792 unique studies and we included 21 of these in our final review. Prevalence of disease in this study was 29.8%, (range = 6.4%-75.4%). The sensitivity and specificity for POCUS in diagnosing appendicitis were 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 83%-96%) and 97% (95% CI = 91%-99%), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 91 and 94%, respectively. Studies performed by emergency physicians had slightly lower test characteristics (sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 92%). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I = 99%, 95% CI = 99%-100%) and the quality of the reported studies was moderate, mostly due to unclear reporting of blinding of physicians and timing of scanning and patient enrollment. Several of the studies were performed by a single operator, and the education and training of the operators were variably reported.
Point-of-care US has relatively high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing acute appendicitis, although the data presented are limited by the quality of the original studies and large CIs. In the hands of an experienced operator, POCUS is an appropriate initial imaging modality for diagnosing appendicitis. Based on our results, it is premature to utilize POCUS as a stand-alone test or to rule out appendicitis.
超声检查(US)用于诊断阑尾炎已得到充分证实。最近,床旁超声检查(POCUS)也被用于阑尾炎的诊断研究,它可能也是一种有价值的诊断工具。本研究的目的是通过系统评价和荟萃分析,确定POCUS,特别是由非放射科医生进行的超声检查,在准确诊断各年龄段患者急性阑尾炎方面的检测特征。
我们使用OVID MEDLINE在研及其他未索引引文数据库和Scopus,对1980年至2015年5月发表的关于床旁、医生操作的经腹超声用于诊断急性阑尾炎的英文文章进行了全面系统的文献检索。研究由两名经过培训的评审员进行筛选并独立提取数据。采用随机效应合并分析构建分层汇总受试者工作特征曲线,并进行荟萃回归分析。使用QUADAS - 2工具评估研究质量。
我们的检索共得到5792项独特研究,最终纳入21项。本研究中疾病的患病率为29.8%(范围 = 6.4% - 75.4%)。POCUS诊断阑尾炎的敏感性和特异性分别为91%(95%置信区间[CI] = 83% - 96%)和97%(95%CI = 91% - 99%)。阳性和阴性预测值分别为91%和94%。急诊医生进行的研究检测特征略低(敏感性 = 80%,特异性 = 92%)。研究之间存在显著异质性(I² = 99%,95%CI = 99% - 100%),且报告研究的质量为中等,主要是由于医生盲法、扫描时间和患者入组的报告不明确。部分研究由单一操作者进行,且对操作者的教育和培训报告不一。
床旁超声对诊断急性阑尾炎具有较高的敏感性和特异性,尽管所呈现的数据受原始研究质量和较大置信区间的限制。在经验丰富的操作者手中,POCUS是诊断阑尾炎的合适初始影像学检查方法。基于我们的结果,将POCUS作为独立检查或排除阑尾炎还为时过早。