• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊医师床边超声与私人远程放射科医师对急性阑尾炎诊断的准确性比较。

Accuracy of emergency physician bedside ultrasonography compared with private teleradiologist for acute appendicitis diagnosis.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Ministry of Health of Turkey Canakkale Mehmet Akif Ersoy State Hospital, Canakkale, Turkey.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Jun;192(3):1473-1479. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03149-w. Epub 2022 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-022-03149-w
PMID:36076151
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common cause of abdominal pain resulting in admission to the emergency room. Imaging methods such as ultrasonography and CT are usually used for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Reports regarding CT scans conducted during night shifts are prepared by private teleradiologists.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound performed by an emergency medicine specialist and private teleradiologists in the diagnosis of AA.

METHODS

This study was conducted prospectively and in a single center in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital. Patients who were admitted to the study between 15.09.2020 and 15.09.2021 and were diagnosed with AA who met the study criteria were included. A total of 134 patients diagnosed with AA, who met the inclusion criteria, out of 158 operated patients were included in the study.

RESULTS

In the study, 77 were male and 57 were female. The mean age of patients with histopathologically positive AA was 31 and 31.5 in negative patients. The sensitivity and specificity of POCUS performed by the emergency physician and private teleradiology for the diagnosis of AA were 78.4% and 59.3% and 58.8% and 53.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

POCUS performed by an emergency medicine specialist showed a higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of AA compared with private teleradiology. Hence, POCUS is more successful in diagnosing AA than private teleradiology. In conclusion, we recommend the concurrent use of AS and POCUS in emergency departments rather than private teleradiology for the diagnosis of AA.

摘要

背景

急性阑尾炎(AA)是导致患者因腹痛而入住急诊室的常见病因。超声和 CT 等影像学方法通常用于诊断急性阑尾炎。夜班时进行的 CT 扫描报告由私人远程放射科医生撰写。

目的

本研究旨在比较急诊医学专家和私人远程放射科医生进行即时护理超声检查(POCUS)诊断 AA 的准确性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性单中心研究,在一家三级医院的急诊科进行。纳入符合研究标准并因 AA 入住的患者。共有 158 例接受手术治疗的 AA 患者,其中 134 例符合纳入标准,被纳入本研究。

结果

在研究中,77 例为男性,57 例为女性。经组织病理学证实为阳性的 AA 患者的平均年龄为 31 岁,阴性患者的平均年龄为 31.5 岁。急诊医师和私人远程放射科医生进行的 POCUS 对 AA 的诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为 78.4%和 59.3%,58.8%和 53.1%。

结论

与私人远程放射科医生相比,急诊医师进行的 POCUS 对 AA 的诊断具有更高的敏感性。因此,POCUS 在诊断 AA 方面比私人远程放射科医生更成功。总之,我们建议在急诊科同时使用 AS 和 POCUS 进行诊断,而不是仅使用私人远程放射科医生进行诊断。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of emergency physician bedside ultrasonography compared with private teleradiologist for acute appendicitis diagnosis.急诊医师床边超声与私人远程放射科医师对急性阑尾炎诊断的准确性比较。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Jun;192(3):1473-1479. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03149-w. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
2
Diagnostic Value and Effect of Bedside Ultrasound in Acute Appendicitis in the Emergency Department.床旁超声在急诊科急性阑尾炎中的诊断价值及效果
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):578-586. doi: 10.1111/acem.13169. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
3
Diagnostic Accuracy of History, Physical Examination, Laboratory Tests, and Point-of-care Ultrasound for Pediatric Acute Appendicitis in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.急诊科小儿急性阑尾炎病史、体格检查、实验室检查及床旁超声的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):523-551. doi: 10.1111/acem.13181.
4
Diagnostic performance of emergency physician-performed point-of-care ultrasonography for acute appendicitis: A meta-analysis.急诊医师床旁超声检查在急性阑尾炎诊断中的应用价值:Meta 分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;37(4):696-705. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.07.025. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
5
Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a pediatric emergency department.床边超声在儿科急诊中诊断急性阑尾炎的准确性。
J Clin Ultrasound. 2024 Jun;52(5):485-490. doi: 10.1002/jcu.23658. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
6
Bedside Sonography Performed by Emergency Physicians to Detect Appendicitis in Children.急诊医师床边超声在儿童阑尾炎诊断中的应用。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;25(9):1035-1041. doi: 10.1111/acem.13445. Epub 2018 May 28.
7
Point-of-care ultrasound to diagnose appendicitis in a Canadian emergency department.加拿大急诊部使用床边超声诊断阑尾炎。
CJEM. 2018 Sep;20(5):732-735. doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.373. Epub 2018 May 17.
8
A prospective, multicenter evaluation of point-of-care ultrasound for appendicitis in the emergency department.在急诊科应用即时超声评估阑尾炎的前瞻性、多中心评估。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Feb;29(2):164-173. doi: 10.1111/acem.14378. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
9
Accuracy of Point-of-care Ultrasonography for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.床旁超声诊断急性阑尾炎的准确性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;24(9):1124-1136. doi: 10.1111/acem.13212. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
10
Emergency Physician-Performed Bedside Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis in a Pediatric Population.急诊医生在儿科人群急性阑尾炎评估中进行的床旁超声检查
J Miss State Med Assoc. 2017 Jan;58(1):10-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic value of systemic immune inflammation index in acute appendicitis and complicated appendicitis in pregnant patients.全身免疫炎症指数在妊娠患者急性阑尾炎及复杂性阑尾炎中的诊断价值
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jul 18;409(1):222. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03420-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Bedside ultrasonography for acute appendicitis: An updated diagnostic meta-analysis.床边超声在急性阑尾炎诊断中的应用:一项更新的诊断荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Oct;70:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
2
Accuracy of Point-of-care Ultrasonography for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.床旁超声诊断急性阑尾炎的准确性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;24(9):1124-1136. doi: 10.1111/acem.13212. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
3
Should Alvarado and Ohmann scores be real indicators for diagnosis of appendicitis and severity of inflammation?
阿尔瓦拉多评分和奥曼评分是否真的是阑尾炎诊断及炎症严重程度的指标?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2017 Jan;23(1):29-33. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2016.89894.
4
Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.急性阑尾炎:发病机制、诊断和治疗的现代认识。
Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1278-1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5.
5
Evaluation of the Alvarado score in acute abdominal pain.阿尔瓦拉多评分在急性腹痛中的评估
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014 Mar;20(2):86-90. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2014.69639.
6
Accuracies of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎诊断方法的准确性。
Am Surg. 2013 Jan;79(1):101-6.
7
Scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly.老年人急性阑尾炎诊断中的评分系统
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2011 Sep;17(5):396-400.
8
Routine ultrasound and limited computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.常规超声和有限的计算机断层扫描在急性阑尾炎诊断中的应用。
World J Surg. 2010 Oct;34(10):2278-85. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0694-y.
9
Prospective evaluation of emergency physician performed bedside ultrasound to detect acute appendicitis.急诊医师床边超声检查对急性阑尾炎诊断的前瞻性评估
Eur J Emerg Med. 2008 Apr;15(2):80-5. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328270361a.
10
Outsourced teleradiology imaging services: an analysis of discordant interpretation in 124,870 cases.外包远程放射学影像服务:对124,870例不一致解读的分析
J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Jun;2(6):478-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.10.013.