Wang Wei, Xie Qing-Yun, Jia Zhen-Yu, Cui Lin, Liu Da, Wang Cai-Ru, Zheng Wei
Department of Orthopedics, Chengdu Military General Hospital, Tianhui Road 270, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 May 2;18(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1536-y.
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) is a scale designed to evaluate the impact of rotator cuff (RC) disorders on patients' general quality of life. Our study aims to adapt the WORC for Chinese patients and to assess its reliability, validity, and responsiveness in Chinese patients with RC disorders.
First, we developed the Chinese version of the WORC (C-WORC) in a five-step procedure of translation and cross-cultural adaptation. Next, the recruiting patients finished all three rounds of scales of the C-WORC, the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and the Oxford Shoulder score (OSS). Then we calculated Cronbach's alpha, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient (r or r ), the effect size (ES), and the standardized response mean (SRM) to evaluate the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the C-WORC, respectively.
Overall, 124 patients with RC disorders successfully completed the first two rounds of the scales, and 108 patients completed the last round of the scales. Good or excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.872-0.954) was found in the overall scale and subscales of C-WORC, as well as good or excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.828-0.961). Moderate or good correlations (r/r = 0.472-0.787) were obtained between the physical subscales of the C-WORC and the OSS and the physical subscales of SF-36; the results were also obtained for the emotions subscale of the C-WORC and the mental subscales of SF-36 (r/r = 0.520-0.713), which, adequately illustrated that good validity was included in the C-WORC. In addition, good responsiveness was also observed in the overall scale and subscales of the C-WORC (ES = 1.57-2.27, SRM = 1.52-2.28).
The C-WORC scale is reliable, valid and responsible for the evaluation of Chinese-speaking patients with RC disorders and would be an effective instrument.
西安大略肩袖指数(WORC)是一种用于评估肩袖(RC)疾病对患者总体生活质量影响的量表。我们的研究旨在使WORC适用于中国患者,并评估其在中国RC疾病患者中的信度、效度和反应度。
首先,我们通过翻译和跨文化调适的五个步骤制定了中文版WORC(C-WORC)。接下来,招募的患者完成了C-WORC、医学结局研究简明健康调查36项量表(SF-36)和牛津肩评分(OSS)的所有三轮测评。然后,我们计算了克朗巴哈系数、组内相关系数(ICC)、皮尔逊或斯皮尔曼相关系数(r或r )、效应量(ES)和标准化反应均数(SRM),分别用以评估C-WORC的信度、效度和反应度。
总体而言,124例RC疾病患者成功完成了前两轮测评,108例患者完成了最后一轮测评。C-WORC总量表及各子量表均具有良好或优秀的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数=0.872-0.954),同时具有良好或优秀的重测信度(ICC=0.828-0.961)。C-WORC的躯体子量表与OSS及SF-36的躯体子量表之间呈中度或良好的相关性(r/r =0.472-0.787);C-WORC的情感子量表与SF-36的精神子量表之间也得到了类似结果(r/r =0.520-0.713),充分说明了C-WORC具有良好的效度。此外,C-WORC总量表及各子量表也表现出良好的反应度(ES=1.57-2.27,SRM=1.52-2.28)。
C-WORC量表在评估说中文的RC疾病患者时具有可靠性、有效性和实用性,将是一种有效的工具。