Suess Olaf, Schomaker Martin, Cabraja Mario, Danne Marco, Kombos Theodoros, Hanna Michael
Spine and Neurotrauma Center, DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend, Spandauer Damm 130, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, Charité University Hosptial, Berlin, Germany.
Patient Saf Surg. 2017 Apr 28;11:12. doi: 10.1186/s13037-017-0128-y. eCollection 2017.
Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a well-established surgical treatment for radiculopathy and myelopathy. Previous studies showed that empty PEEK cages have lower radiographic fusion rates, but the clinical relevance remains unclear. This paper's aim is to provide high-quality evidence on the outcomes of ACDF with empty PEEK cages and on the relevance of radiographic fusion for clinical outcomes.
This large prospective multicenter clinical trial performed single-level ACDF with empty PEEK cages on patients with cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. The main clinical outcomes were VAS (0-10) for pain and NDI (0-100) for functioning. Radiographic fusion was evaluated by two investigators for three different aspects.
The median (range) improvement of the VAS pain score was: 3 (1-6) at 6 months, 3 (2-8) at 12 months, and 4 (2-8) at 18 months. The median (range) improvement of the NDI score was: 12 (2-34) at 6 months, 18 (4-46) at 12 months, and 22 (2-44) at 18 months. Complete radiographic fusion was reached by 126 patients (43%) at 6 months, 214 patients (73%) at 12 months, and 241 patients (83%) at 18 months. Radiographic fusion was a highly significant ( < 0.001) predictor of the improvement of VAS and NDI scores.
This study provides strong evidence that ACDF is effective treatment, but the overall rate of radiographic fusion with empty PEEK cages is slow and insufficient. Lack of complete radiographic fusion leads to less improvement of pain and disability. We recommend against using empty uncoated pure PEEK cages in ACDF.
ISRCTN42774128. Retrospectively registered 14 April 2009.
颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)是一种成熟的神经根病和脊髓病手术治疗方法。既往研究表明,空的聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器的影像学融合率较低,但临床相关性仍不明确。本文旨在提供关于使用空的PEEK椎间融合器进行ACDF的疗效以及影像学融合与临床疗效相关性的高质量证据。
这项大型前瞻性多中心临床试验对患有颈椎神经根病或脊髓病的患者采用空的PEEK椎间融合器进行单节段ACDF。主要临床疗效指标为疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS,0 - 10分)和功能的颈部功能障碍指数(NDI,0 - 100分)。两名研究人员从三个不同方面评估影像学融合情况。
VAS疼痛评分的中位数(范围)改善情况为:6个月时3分(1 - 6分),12个月时3分(2 - 8分),18个月时4分(2 - 8分)。NDI评分的中位数(范围)改善情况为:6个月时12分(2 - 34分),12个月时18分(4 - 46分),18个月时22分(2 - 44分)。6个月时126例患者(43%)实现完全影像学融合,12个月时214例患者(73%)实现完全影像学融合,18个月时241例患者(83%)实现完全影像学融合。影像学融合是VAS和NDI评分改善的高度显著(<0.001)预测因素。
本研究提供了有力证据表明ACDF是一种有效的治疗方法,但空的PEEK椎间融合器的总体影像学融合率缓慢且不足。缺乏完全的影像学融合导致疼痛和残疾改善程度较小。我们不建议在ACDF中使用空的未涂层纯PEEK椎间融合器。
ISRCTN42774128。2009年4月14日追溯注册。