Suppr超能文献

挪威助产士对其助产士教育的看法——一项混合方法研究。

Norwegian midwives' opinion of their midwifery education - a mixed methods study.

作者信息

Lukasse Mirjam, Lilleengen Anne Marie, Fylkesnes Anne Margrethe, Henriksen Lena

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Science, PB 4 St. Olavs plass, N-0130, Oslo, Norway.

Division of General Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4950, Nydalen, 4 St. Olavs plass, N-0130, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2017 May 3;17(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0917-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Midwifery education in Norway has undergone radical reforms in the past few decades. In 2004, the compulsory year of paid internship was removed from the requirement to become an authorised midwife. Since then, authorisation as a midwife depends on the successful completion of a two-year full-time academic course, consisting of 50% clinical practice and 50% theoretical education. Our objective was to examine midwives' opinion of their Norwegian midwifery education in relation to their midwifery practice, comparing those educated with internship to those without.

METHODS

We performed a mixed-methods study based on data from a nationwide cross-sectional survey. A sample of 547 midwives completed a postal questionnaire, autumn 2014. Midwives were asked how they were educated, how their education prepared them for practice (multiple choice) and to freely comment on their midwifery education. Thematic analysis and descriptive and comparative analysis was used. Data sets were analysed independently and jointly interpreted.

RESULTS

Of our sample, 154 (28.2%) were educated through a two-year midwifery education without internship, while 393 (71.8%) had a one-year midwifery education with internship. Compared to midwives who had internship, midwives without were four times more likely to report that their education did not, or only partially prepare them for their work as a midwife. The association lost its significance when adjusted for experience as a midwife. According to the qualitative data, the primary reason for the association was insufficient clinical practice during education. Relevant clinical placement, ample practice time with good preceptorship and internship were proposed as methods to prepare for practice as a midwife. The theory-practice gap was highlighted as another hindrance to being prepared for practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Academisation of the midwifery education has resulted in newly qualified midwives feeling less prepared for practice. Midwives would have liked more time for clinical practice and simulation training of core midwifery clinical skills included in the education. Midwifery educations need to explore ways to achieve a good balance between practice and theory. Workplaces need to explore alternative ways to internship to assist new graduates to become confident midwives with a strong midwifery identity.

摘要

背景

在过去几十年里,挪威的助产士教育经历了彻底的改革。2004年,成为一名获授权助产士所需的强制性带薪实习一年的要求被取消。从那时起,成为助产士的授权取决于是否成功完成一门为期两年的全日制学术课程,该课程由50%的临床实践和50%的理论教育组成。我们的目的是研究助产士对其挪威助产士教育与其助产实践之间关系的看法,比较接受过实习教育的助产士和未接受过实习教育的助产士。

方法

我们基于一项全国性横断面调查的数据进行了一项混合方法研究。2014年秋季,547名助产士的样本完成了一份邮寄问卷。助产士被问及他们是如何接受教育的,他们的教育如何使他们为实践做好准备(多项选择),并要求他们对自己的助产士教育进行自由评论。采用了主题分析、描述性分析和比较性分析。对数据集进行了独立分析并共同解读。

结果

在我们的样本中,154名(28.2%)通过为期两年的无实习助产士教育接受培训,而393名(71.8%)接受过为期一年的有实习助产士教育。与有实习经历的助产士相比,没有实习经历的助产士报告其教育没有或只是部分地使他们为助产士工作做好准备的可能性高出四倍。在对助产士经验进行调整后,这种关联失去了显著性。根据定性数据,这种关联的主要原因是教育期间临床实践不足。相关的临床实习安排、充足的实践时间以及良好的带教和实习被提议作为为助产士实践做好准备的方法。理论与实践的差距被强调为另一个影响为实践做好准备的障碍。

结论

助产士教育的学术化导致新获得资格的助产士感觉对实践准备不足。助产士希望在教育中有更多时间用于临床实践以及对助产士核心临床技能的模拟培训。助产士教育需要探索在实践和理论之间实现良好平衡的方法。工作场所需要探索替代实习的方法,以帮助新毕业生成为有自信且具有强烈助产士身份认同的助产士。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/accd/5415717/7820be595ac5/12909_2017_917_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验