Arami Saba, Kimyai Soodabeh, Oskoee Parnian-Alizadeh, Daneshpooy Mehdi, Rikhtegaran Sahand, Bahari Mahmoud, Kahnamoii Mehdi-Abed
Post graduate student, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Dental and Periodontal Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Apr 1;9(4):e520-e526. doi: 10.4317/jced.53591. eCollection 2017 Apr.
In the repair process achieving high bond strength between the new and old resin based materials is necessary for clinical longevity. This study compared the effect of three different mechanical surface treatments (air abrasion, Nd:YAG laser and diamond bur) on the repair bond strength of giomer.
In this study, 125 cylindrical giomer samples were used. The giomer samples were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=25). In group 1, the samples did not undergo any surface treatment. In groups 2 to 4, the samples underwent surface treatments with air abrasion, Nd:YAG laser and a diamond bur. The samples in group 5 were prepared to measure giomer cohesive strength. Subsequently, the new giomer was bonded to the existing giomer in groups 1 to 4. Then the repair bond strength of the samples was measured. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test were used to compare the bond strength.
There were significant differences between the different surface treatments (<0.001); the repair bond strength in the air abrasion group was significantly higher than that in the Nd:YAG laser group, in which it was significantly higher than that in the diamond bur group, which was in turn higher than that in group 1 (no surface treatment) (<0.001). In addition, the cohesive strength of giomer was significantly higher than the repair bond strength in the 4 other study groups (<0.001).
Of all the surface treatments, air abrasion and Nd:YAG laser, in descending order, yielded the highest repair bond strength values, with the repair bond strength values of 60‒70% of the giomer cohesive strength. Air abrasion, bond strength, giomer, Nd:YAG laser, repair, surface treatment.
在修复过程中,新的和旧的树脂基材料之间实现高粘结强度对于临床使用寿命至关重要。本研究比较了三种不同的机械表面处理(空气喷砂、钕钇铝石榴石激光和金刚砂车针)对聚酸改性玻璃离子复合体修复粘结强度的影响。
本研究使用了125个圆柱形聚酸改性玻璃离子复合体样本。这些样本被随机分为5组(每组n = 25)。第1组样本未进行任何表面处理。第2至4组样本分别接受空气喷砂、钕钇铝石榴石激光和金刚砂车针的表面处理。第5组样本用于测量聚酸改性玻璃离子复合体的内聚强度。随后,将新的聚酸改性玻璃离子复合体粘结到第1至4组现有的聚酸改性玻璃离子复合体上。然后测量样本的修复粘结强度。采用单因素方差分析和事后检验的Tukey检验来比较粘结强度。
不同表面处理之间存在显著差异(<0.001);空气喷砂组的修复粘结强度显著高于钕钇铝石榴石激光组,而钕钇铝石榴石激光组又显著高于金刚砂车针组,金刚砂车针组又高于第1组(未进行表面处理组)(<0.001)。此外,聚酸改性玻璃离子复合体的内聚强度显著高于其他4个研究组的修复粘结强度(<0.001)。
在所有表面处理中,空气喷砂和钕钇铝石榴石激光按降序排列产生了最高的修复粘结强度值,修复粘结强度值为聚酸改性玻璃离子复合体内聚强度的60%至70%。空气喷砂、粘结强度、聚酸改性玻璃离子复合体、钕钇铝石榴石激光、修复、表面处理。